Advertisement

Dynamic, patient-specific mitral valve modelling for planning transcatheter repairs

  • Olivia K. GintyEmail author
  • John T. Moore
  • Mehdi Eskandari
  • Patrick Carnahan
  • Andras Lasso
  • Matthew A. Jolley
  • Mark Monaghan
  • Terry M. Peters
Original Article
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose:

Transcatheter, beating heart repair techniques for mitral valve regurgitation is a very active area of development. However, it is difficult to both simulate and predict the clinical outcomes of mitral repairs, owing to the complexity of mitral valve geometry and the influence of hemodynamics. We aim to produce a workflow for manufacturing dynamic patient-specific models to simulate the mitral valve for transcatheter repair applications.

Methods:

In this paper, we present technology and associated workflow, for using transesophageal echocardiography to generate dynamic physical replicas of patient valves. We validate our workflow using six patient datasets representing patients with unique or particularly challenging pathologies as selected by a cardiologist. The dynamic component of the models and their resultant potential as procedure planning tools is due to a dynamic pulse duplicator that permits the evaluation of the valve models experiencing realistic hemodynamics.

Results:

Early results indicate the workflow has excellent anatomical accuracy and the ability to replicate regurgitation pathologies, as shown by colour Doppler ultrasound and anatomical measurements comparing patients and models. Analysis of all measurements successfully resulted in t critical two-tail > t stat and p values > 0.05, thus demonstrating no statistical difference between the patients and models, owing to high fidelity morphological replication.

Conclusions:

Due to the combination of a dynamic environment and patient-specific modelling, this workflow demonstrates a promising technology for simulating the complete morphology of mitral valves undergoing transcatheter repairs.

Keywords

Modelling Mitral valve Mitral valve models Surgical simulation Transcatheter devices 3D printing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Paul Picot and Kevin Barker for help in the design and construction of the MVS pulse duplicator, Nora Boone for help in its validation and Dave Ly for help in computer-aided design (CAD) software work. Funding: This study was funded by the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario, as well as by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (20994), the Ontario Research Fund (IDCD), and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (FDN 201409).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

John Moore and Terry Peters are co-owners of Archetype Medical, developers of the MVS pulse duplicator. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Delling FN, Deo R, De Ferranti SD, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jiménez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Lutsey PL, MacKey JS, Matchar DB, Matsushita K, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, O’Flaherty M, Palaniappan LP, Pandey A, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Ritchey MD, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sampson UK, Satou GM, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P (2018) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137(12):67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mirabel M, Iung B, Baron G, Messika-Zeitoun D, Détaint D, Vanoverschelde JL, Butchart EG, Ravaud P, Vahanian A (2007) What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? Eur Heart J 28(11):1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samad Z, Shaw LK, Phelan M, Glower DD, Ersboll M, Toptine JH, Alexander JH, Kisslo JA, Wang A, Mark DB, Velazquez EJ (2018) Long-term outcomes of mitral regurgitation by type and severity. Am Heart J 203:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kohorst K, Pretorius M (2018) Future technology of mitral valve repair and replacement for mitral valve disease. In: Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, vol 23, no 1, p 1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pan M, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Serrador A, Pérez de Prado A, Mesa D, Estévez Loureiro R (2017) Selection of the best of 2016 in MitraClip therapy for the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation. Revista Española de Cardiología (Engl Ed) 70(3):216Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cesna S, De Backer O, Søndergaard L (2017) Rapid adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate- and high-risk patients to treat severe aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Dis 9(6):1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Mieghem NM, Piazza N, Anderson RH, Tzikas A, Nieman K, De Laat LE, McGhie JS, Geleijnse ML, Feldman T, Serruys PW, De Jaegere PP (2010) Anatomy of the mitral valvular complex and its implications for transcatheter interventions for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(8):617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bateman MG, Iaizzo PA (2012) Imaging in the context of replacement heart valve development: use of the Visible Heart® methodologies. Cardiovasc Diagn Therapy 2(3):220Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leopaldi AM, Wrobel K, Speziali G, van Tuijl S, Drasutiene A, Chitwood WR (2018) The dynamic cardiac biosimulator: a method for training physicians in beating-heart mitral valve repair procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155(1):147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taramasso M, Candreva A, Pozzoli A, Guidotti A, Gaemperli O, Nietlispach F, Barthelmes J, Emmert MY, Weber A, Benussi S, Alfieri O, Maisano F (2015) Current challenges in interventional mitral valve treatment. J Thorac Dis 7(9):1536Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    LifeLike BioTissue (2016) LifeLike BioTissue’s Mitral Valve. http://lifelikebiotissue.com/shop/cardiac-surgery/mitral-valve. Accessed 3 Oct 2018
  12. 12.
    Mahmood F, Owais K, Taylor C, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Manning W, Matyal R, Khabbaz KR (2015) Three-dimensional printing of mitral valve using echocardiographic data. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8(2):226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vukicevic M, Puperi DS, Jane Grande-Allen K, Little SH (2017) 3D printed modeling of the mitral valve for catheter-based structural interventions. Ann Biomed Eng 45(2):508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sardari Nia P, Heuts S, Daemen J, Luyten P, Vainer J, Hoorntje J, Cheriex E, Maessen J (2016) Preoperative planning with three-dimensional reconstruction of patient’s anatomy, rapid prototyping and simulation for endoscopic mitral valve repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 24(2):163Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grbic S, Easley TF, Mansi T, Bloodworth CH, Pierce EL, Voigt I, Neumann D, Krebs J, Yuh DD, Jensen MO, Comaniciu D, Yoganathan AP (2015) Multi-modal validation framework of mitral valve geometry and functional computational models. In: Statistical atlases and computational models of the heart. Imaging and modelling challenges, vol 8896, p 239Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min JK, Little SH (2017) Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(2):171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ginty OK, Moore JM, Xu Y, Xia W, Fujii S, Bainbridge D, Peters TM, Kiaii BB, Chu MW (2018) Dynamic patient-specific three-dimensional simulation of mitral repair: can we practice mitral repair preoperatively? Innov Technol Tech Cardiothorac Vasc Surg 13(1):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Vosburgh KG (2014) 3D slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In: Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy. Springer, New York, NY, pp 277–289Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoo TS, Ackerman MJ, Lorensen WE, Schroeder W, Chalana V, Aylward S, Metaxas D, Whitaker R (2002) Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing API: a technical report on ITK-the insight toolkit. Stud Health Technol Inform 85:586Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scanlan AB, Nguyen AV, Ilina A, Lasso A, Cripe L, Jegatheeswaran A, Silvestro E, McGowan FX, Mascio CE, Fuller S, Spray TL, Cohen MS, Fichtinger G, Jolley MA (2018) Comparison of 3D echocardiogram-derived 3D printed valve models to molded models for simulated repair of pediatric atrioventricular valves. Pediatric Cardiol 39(3):538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis 22(1):61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carnahan P, Ginty O, Moore J, Lasso A, Jolley, M, Herz C, Eskandari M, Bainbridge D, Peters T (2019) Interactive-automatic segmentation and modelling of the mitral valve. In: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, FIMH Proceedings . ArXiv:1905.01344
  23. 23.
    Boone N, Moore J, Ginty O, Bainbridge D, Peters T (2019) A dynamic mitral valve simulator for surgical training and patient specific preoperative planning. In: Medical imaging 2019: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, SPIE Proceedings, vol 10951Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivia K. Ginty
    • 1
    Email author
  • John T. Moore
    • 1
  • Mehdi Eskandari
    • 2
  • Patrick Carnahan
    • 1
  • Andras Lasso
    • 3
  • Matthew A. Jolley
    • 4
  • Mark Monaghan
    • 2
  • Terry M. Peters
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Robarts Research InstituteWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.King’s College HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Laboratory for Percutaneous SurgeryQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine/Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Medical Biophysics, Medical Imaging, School of Biomedical EngineeringWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations