Advertisement

On the accuracy of optically tracked transducers for image-guided transcranial ultrasound

  • V. Chaplin
  • M. A. Phipps
  • S. V. Jonathan
  • W. A. Grissom
  • P. F. Yang
  • L. M. Chen
  • C. F. CaskeyEmail author
Original Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) is increasingly being explored to modulate neuronal activity. To target neuromodulation, researchers often localize the FUS beam onto the brain region(s) of interest using spatially tracked tools overlaid on pre-acquired images. Here, we quantify the accuracy of optically tracked image-guided FUS with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) thermometry, evaluate sources of error and demonstrate feasibility of these procedures to target the macaque somatosensory region.

Methods

We developed an optically tracked FUS system capable of projecting the transducer focus onto a pre-acquired MRI volume. To measure the target registration error (TRE), we aimed the transducer focus at a desired target in a phantom under image guidance, heated the target while imaging with MR thermometry and then calculated the TRE as the difference between the targeted and heated locations. Multiple targets were measured using either an unbiased or bias-corrected calibration. We then targeted the macaque S1 brain region, where displacement induced by the acoustic radiation force was measured using MR acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI).

Results

All calibration methods enabled registration with TRE on the order of 3 mm. Unbiased calibration resulted in an average TRE of 3.26 mm (min–max: 2.80–4.53 mm), which was not significantly changed by prospective bias correction (TRE of 3.05 mm; 2.06–3.81 mm, p = 0.55). Restricting motion between the transducer and target and increasing the distance between tracked markers reduced the TRE to 2.43 mm (min–max: 0.79–3.88 mm). MR-ARFI images showed qualitatively similar shape and extent as projected beam profiles in a living non-human primate.

Conclusions

Our study describes methods for image guidance of FUS neuromodulation and quantifies errors associated with this method in a large animal. The workflow is efficient enough for in vivo use, and we demonstrate transcranial MR-ARFI in vivo in macaques for the first time.

Keywords

Focused ultrasound Ultrasound neuromodulation Optical tracking Image-guided therapy Neuromodulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by National Institutes of Health Grants 5T32EB014841, R24 MH109105, and the Focused Ultrasound Foundation. We would also like to acknowledge expert assistance from George Wilson and Chaohui Tang for animal handling support and Tom Manuel for assistance with computer-aided design.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11548_2019_1988_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (125 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 125 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hynynen K, Darkazanli A, Unger E, Schenck JF (1993) MRI-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Med Phys 20:107–115.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wan H et al (1996) Ultrasound surgery: comparison of strategies using phased array systems. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 43(6):1085–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mestas JL, Fowler RA, Evjen TJ, Somaglino L, Moussatov A, Ngo J, Chesnais S, Rognvaldsson S, Fossheim SL, Nilssen EA, Lafon C (2014) Therapeutic efficacy of the combination of doxorubicin-loaded liposomes with inertial cavitation generated by confocal ultrasound in AT2 dunning rat tumour model. J Drug Target 22:688–697.  https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2014.906604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ter Haar G, Coussios C (2007) High intensity focused ultrasound: physical principles and devices. Int J Hyperth 23:89–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02656730601186138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Unga J, Hashida M (2014) Ultrasound induced cancer immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 72:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Z, Yang XY, Liu Y, Morse MA, Lyerly HK, Clay TM, Zhong P (2006) Investigation of HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity in a murine tumor model. AIP Conf Proc 829:241–245.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2205474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kennedy JE, ter Haar GR, Cranston D (2003) High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol 76:590–599.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/17150274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McDannold N (2005) Quantitative MRI-based temperature mapping based on the proton resonant frequency shift: review of validation studies. Int J Hyperth 21:533–546.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02656730500096073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quesson B, Vimeux F, Salomir R, De Zwart JA, Moonen CTW (2002) Automatic control of hyperthermic therapy based on real-time fourier analysis of MR temperature maps. Magn Reson Med 47:1065–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clement GT, White PJ, King RL, McDannold N, Hynynen K (2005) A magnetic resonance imaging-compatible, large-scale array for trans-skull ultrasound surgery and therapy. J Ultrasound Med 24:1117–1125.  https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.8.1117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hynynen K, Clement GT, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, King R, White PJ, Vitek S, Jolesz FA (2004) 500-Element ultrasound phased array system for noninvasive focal surgery of the brain: a preliminary rabbit study with ex vivo human skulls. Magn Reson Med 52:100–107.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hand JW, Shaw A, Sadhoo N, Rajagopal S, Dickinson RJ, Gavrilov LR (2009) A random phased array device for delivery of high intensity focused ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 54:5675–5693.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Savic LJ, De Lin M, Duran R, Schernthaner RE, Hamm B, Geschwind J-F, Hong K, Chapiro J (2015) Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of lesion response to MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids. Acad Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.008 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    King RL, Brown JR, Pauly KB (2014) Localization of ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation in the mouse model. Ultrasound Med Biol 40:1512–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim H, Chiu A, Lee SD, Fischer K, Yoo SS (2014) Focused ultrasound-mediated non-invasive brain stimulation: examination of sonication parameters. Brain Stimul 7:748–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ye PP, Brown JR, Pauly KB (2016) Frequency dependence of ultrasound neurostimulation in the mouse brain. Ultrasound Med Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.02.012 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Airan RD, Meyer RA, Ellens NPK, Rhodes KR, Farahani K, Pomper MG, Kadam SD, Green JJ (2017) Noninvasive targeted transcranial neuromodulation via focused ultrasound gated drug release from nanoemulsions. Nano Lett 17:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu S-Y, Aurup C, Sanchez CS, Grondin J, Zheng W, Kamimura H, Ferrera VP, Konofagou EE (2018) Efficient blood-brain barrier opening in primates with neuronavigation-guided ultrasound and real-time acoustic mapping. Sci Rep 8:7978.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25904-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szablowski JO, Lee-Gosselin A, Lue B, Malounda D, Shapiro MG (2018) Acoustically targeted chemogenetics for the non-invasive control of neural circuits. Nat Biomed Eng 2:475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim H, Chiu A, Park S, Yoo SS (2012) Image-guided navigation of single-element focused ultrasound transducer. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 22:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee W, Kim H, Jung Y, Song I-U, Chung YA, Yoo S-S (2015) Image-guided transcranial focused ultrasound stimulates human primary somatosensory cortex. Sci Rep 5:8743.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang P-F, Phipps MA, Newton AT, Chaplin V, Gore JC, Caskey CF, Chen LM (2018) Neuromodulation of sensory networks in monkey brain by focused ultrasound with MRI guidance and detection. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26287-7 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hinsche AF, Smith RM (2001) Image-guided surgery. Curr Orthop 15:296–303.  https://doi.org/10.1054/cuor.2001.0198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Azagury DE, Dua MM, Barrese JC, Henderson JM, Buchs NC, Ris F, Cloyd JM, Martinie JB, Razzaque S, Nicolau S, Soler L, Marescaux J, Visser BC (2015) Image-guided surgery. Curr Probl Surg 52:476–520.  https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2015.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lindseth F et al (2013) Ultrasound-based guidance and therapy. In: Advancements and breakthroughs in ultrasound imaging. IntechOpen.  https://doi.org/10.5772/55884
  26. 26.
    Perrin DP, Vasilyev NV, Novotny P, Stoll J, Howe RD, Dupont PE, Salgo IS, del Nido PJ (2009) Image guided surgical interventions. Curr Probl Surg 46:730–766.  https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2009.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    West JB, Maurer CR (2004) Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:533–545.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2004.825614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR (1998) Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17:694–702.  https://doi.org/10.1109/42.736021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miga MI, Roberts DW, Kennedy FE, Platenik LA, Hartov A, Lunn KE, Paulsen KD (2001) Modeling of retraction and resection for intraoperative updating of images. Neurosurgery 49:75–85.  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-200107000-00012 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Conley RH, Meszoely IM, Weis JA, Pheiffer TS, Arlinghaus LR, Yankeelov TE, Miga MI (2015) Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:1985–1996.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1235-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burlew MM, Madsen EL, Zagzebski JA, Banjavic RA, Sum SW (1980) A new ultrasound tissue-equivalent material. Radiology 134:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rieke V, Pauly KB (2008) MR thermometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:376–390.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Steinmeier R, Rachinger J, Kaus M, Ganslandt O, Huk W, Fahlbusch R (2000) Factors influencing the application accuracy of neuronavigation systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 75:188–202.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000048404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jonathan S, Phipps MA, Chaplin VL, Singh A, Yang PF, Newton AT, Gore JC, Chen LM, Caskey CF, Grissom WA (2018) Optical tracking-guided MR-ARFI for targeting focused ultrasound neuromodulationin non-human primates. In: Grissom WA, Caskey CF (eds) In The 18th international society of therapeutic ultrasound, pp 176–178. NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Labadie RF, Davis BM, Fitzpatrick JM (2005) Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 13:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wiles AD, Likholyot A, Frantz DD, Peters TM (2008) A statistical model for point-based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:378–390.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2007.908124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McDannold N, Maier SE (2008) Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging. Med Phys 35:3748–3758.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2956712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hertzberg Y, Volovick A, Zur Y, Medan Y, Vitek S, Navon G (2010) Ultrasound focusing using magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging: application to ultrasound transcranial therapy. Med Phys 37:2934–2942.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3395553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee W, Kim H-C, Jung Y, Chung YA, Song I-U, Lee J-H, Yoo S-S (2016) Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of human primary visual cortex. Sci Rep 6:34026.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging ScienceVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations