Assessment of surgical skills by using surgical navigation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
- 159 Downloads
To assess surgical skills in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with and without surgical navigation (SN).
We employed an SN system that synchronizes the real-time endoscopic image with a virtual reality three-dimensional (3D) model for RAPN and evaluated the skills of two expert surgeons with regard to the identification and dissection of the renal artery (non-SN group, n = 21 [first surgeon n = 9, second surgeon n = 12]; SN group, n = 32 [first surgeon n = 11, second surgeon n = 21]). We converted all movements of the robotic forceps during RAPN into a dedicated vocabulary. Using RAPN videos, we classified all movements of the robotic forceps into direct action (defined as movements of the robotic forceps that directly affect tissues) and connected motion (defined as movements that link actions). In addition, we analyzed the frequency, duration, and occupancy rate of the connected motion.
In the SN group, the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score was lower (7 vs. 6, P = 0.019) and the time to identify and dissect the renal artery (16 vs. 9 min, P = 0.008) was significantly shorter. The connected motions of inefficient “insert,” “pull,” and “rotate” motions were significantly improved by SN. SN significantly improved the frequency, duration, and occupancy rate of connected motions of the right hand of the first surgeon and of both hands of the second surgeon. The improvements in connected motions were positively associated with SN for both surgeons.
This is the first study to investigate SN for nephron-sparing surgery. SN with 3D models might help improve the connected motions of expert surgeons to ensure efficient RAPN.
KeywordsComputer-assisted Image-guided surgery Kidney Nephrectomy Robotics Surgical skill
Susumu Oguri supported this study by developing the marker holder on the da Vinci endoscope. Authors thank b-com (1219 Avenue des Champs Blancs, 35510 Cesson-Sévigné, France) for provision of the software “Surgery Workflow Toolbox [Annotate]” used in this study. And this research was supported by AMED under Grant Number JP18he1802002.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Board approved our study (IRB license no. 28-119).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Video (Supplement 1). [Surgical Navigation for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN)]. We proposed an approach to surgical navigation using a system for synchronizing real image in the endoscopy with a 3D model in VR during RAPN. Using this system, it became easier to visually confirm the location the surgeon was currently viewing. As a result, the surgeon was able to rapidly determine the location of the renal artery or tumor. (MP4 47463 kb)
- 4.Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, Blute ML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH, Faraday MM, Kaouk JH, Leveillee RJ, Matin SF, Russo P, Uzzo RG, Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Lam T, Marconi L, Merseburger AS, Mulders P, Powles T, Staehler M, Volpe A, Bex A (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Oropesa I, Sanchez-Gonzalez P, Lamata P, Chmarra MK, Pagador JB, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Gómez EJ (2011) Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 171:e81–e95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Teber D, Guven S, Simpfendörfer T, Baumhauer M, Güven EO, Yencilek F, Gözen AS, Rassweiler J (2009) Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. Eur Urol 56:332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Garraud C, Gibaud B, Penet C, Gazuguel G, Dardenne G, Jannin P (2014) An ontology-based software suite for the analysis of surgical process model. In: Proceedings of surgetica. Chambery, France. pp 243–245Google Scholar
- 20.Komai Y, Sugimoto M, Gotohda N, Matsubara N, Kobayashi T, Sakai Y, Shiga Y, Saito N (2016) Patient-specific 3-dimensional printed kidney designed for “4D” surgical navigation: a novel aid to facilitate minimally invasive off-clamp partial nephrectomy in complex tumor cases. Urology 91:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lu Q, Zhao X, Ji C, Guo S, Liu G, Zhang S, Li X, Gan W, Guo H (2017) Modified laparoscopic simple enucleation with single-layer suture technique versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating localized renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 49:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1470-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Paulucci DJ, Rosen DC, Sfakianos JP, Whalen MJ, Abaza R, Eun DD, Krane LS, Hemal AK, Badani KK (2017) Selective arterial clamping does not improve outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score analysis of patients without impaired renal function. BJU Int 119:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Furukawa J, Miyake H, Hinata N, Muramaki M, Tanaka K, Fujisawa M (2016) Renal functional and perioperative outcomes of selective versus complete renal arterial clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: early single-center experience with 39 cases. Surg Innov 23:242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350615610648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gurgel HM, Croci AT, Cabrita HA, Vicente JR, Leonhardt MC, Rodrigues JC (2014) Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty with and without a computer-assisted system: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. J Arthroplasty 29:167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J (2006) Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B:163–167. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar