Advertisement

Automatic detection of perforator vessels using infrared thermography in reconstructive surgery

  • Michael Unger
  • Miriam Markfort
  • Dirk Halama
  • Claire Chalopin
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Knowing the location of the blood vessels supplying the skin and subcutaneous tissue is a requirement during the planning of tissue transfer in reconstructive surgery. Commonly used imaging techniques such as computed tomography angiography and indocyanine green angiography expose the patient to radiation or a contrast agent, respectively. Infrared thermal imaging was evaluated with success as a non-invasive alternative. To support the interpretation of thermograms, a method to automatically detect the perforators was developed and evaluated.

Methods

A system consisting of a thermal camera, a PC and custom software was developed. The temperature variations of the skin surface were analysed to extract the perforator locations. A study was conducted to assess the performance of the algorithm by comparing the detection results of the algorithm with manually labelled thermal images by two clinicians of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap of 20 healthy volunteers.

Results

The F measure, precision and recall were used to evaluate the system performance. The median F measure is 0.833, the median precision is 0.80, and the median recall is 0.907.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that it is possible to automatically and reliably detect the skin perforators in thermograms despite their weak temperature signature. Infrared thermal imaging is a non-invasive and contactless approach suitable for intraoperative use. Combined with a computer-assisted tool for the automatic detection of perforator vessels, it is a relevant alternative intraoperative imaging method to the standard indocyanine green angiography.

Keywords

Non-invasive imaging Automatic segmentation Operation planning Skin transplant 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMWi) in the scope of Zentrales Innovationsprogramm Mittelstand (ZIM) (Grant Number KF 2026723AK4).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Gardiner MD, Nanchahal J (2010) Strategies to ensure success of microvascular free tissue transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(9):e665–e673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A (2018) Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(4):468–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cina A, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P, Cipriani A, Salgarello M, Masetti R, Bonomo L (2013) Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 23(8):2333–2343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lange CJ, Thimmappa ND, Boddu SR, Dutruel SP, Pei M, Farooq Z, Heshmatzadeh Behzadi A, Wang Y, Zabih R, Prince MR (2017) Automating perforator flap MRA and CTA reporting. J Digit Imaging 30(3):350–357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chae MP, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM (2016) Comparative study of software techniques for 3d mapping of perforators in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap planning. Gland Surg 5(2):99–106PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong C-H, Wei F-C (2010) Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 32(9):1236–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rozen WM, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Gibson RN, Taylor GI (2008) Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and doppler ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(1):9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giunta R, Geisweid A, Feller AM (2000) The value of preoperative doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(7):2381–2386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall MV, Rasmussen JC, Tan I-C, Aldrich MB, Adams KE, Wang X, Fife CE, Maus EA, Smith LA, Sevick-Muraca EM (2010) Near-infrared fluorescence imaging in humans with indocyanine green: a review and update. Open Surg Oncol J 2(2):12–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lahiri BB, Bagavathiappan S, Jayakumar T, Philip J (2012) Medical applications of infrared thermography: a review. Infrared Phys Technol 55(4):221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang K, Yoon S, Sheth N, Seidel M, Antalek M, Ahad J, Darlington T, Ikeda A, Kato GJ, Ackerman H, Gorbach AM (2015) Rapid vs. delayed infrared responses after ischemia reveal recruitment of different vascular beds. Quant Infrared Thermogr J 12(2):173–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pirtini Çetingül M, Herman C (2011) Quantification of the thermal signature of a melanoma lesion. Int J Therm Sci 50(4):421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vreugdenburg TD, Willis CD, Mundy L, Hiller JE (2013) A systematic review of elastography, electrical impedance scanning, and digital infrared thermography for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(3):665–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerasimova E, Audit B, Roux SG, Khalil A, Gileva O, Argoul F, Naimark O, Arneodo A (2014) Wavelet-based multifractal analysis of dynamic infrared thermograms to assist in early breast cancer diagnosis. Front Physiol 5:176CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Omranipour R, Kazemian A, Alipour S, Najafi M, Alidoosti M, Navid M, Alikhassi A, Ahmadinejad N, Bagheri K, Izadi S (2016) Comparison of the accuracy of thermography and mammography in the detection of breast cancer. Breast Care 11(4):260–264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Denoble AE, Hall N, Pieper CF, Kraus VB (2010) Patellar skin surface temperature by thermography reflects knee osteoarthritis severity. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 3:69–75CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polidori G, Renard Y, Lorimier S, Pron H, Derruau S, Taiar R (2017) Medical infrared thermography assistance in the surgical treatment of axillary hidradenitis suppurativa: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 34:56–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagavathiappan S, Saravanan T, Philip J, Jayakumar T, Raj B, Karunanithi R, Panicker TMR, Paul Korath M, Jagadeesan K (2009) Infrared thermal imaging for detection of peripheral vascular disorders. J Med Phys 34(1):43–47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin PH, Echeverria A, Poi MJ (2017) Infrared thermography in the diagnosis and management of vasculitis. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 3(3):112–114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Weerd L, Weum S, Mercer JB (2012) Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative phase of DIEP flap surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(5):694–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steketee J (1973) Spectral emissivity of skin and pericardium. Phys Med Biol 18(5):686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimmermann T, Zimmermann M (2012) Lehrbuch der Infrarotthermografie: allgemeine Grundlagen der Thermodynamik, Grundlagen der Strahlungsphysik, Infrarot-Geräte-Technologie (für normative Stufe 1 und 2). Fraunhofer IRB-Verl, Stuttgart. OCLC:816255129Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt E, Eckert E (1935) Über die Richtungsverteilung der Wärmestrahlung von Oberflächen. Forschung auf dem Gebiet des Ingenieurwesens A 6(4):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gerasimova-Chechkina E, Toner B, Marin Z, Audit B, Roux SG, Argoul F, Khalil A, Gileva O, Naimark O, Arneodo A (2016) Comparative multifractal analysis of dynamic infrared thermograms and X-ray mammograms enlightens changes in the environment of malignant tumors. Front Physiol 7:336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gerasimova-Chechkina E, Toner B, Marin Z, Audit B, Roux SG, Argoul F, Khalil A, Gileva O, Naimark O, Arneodo A (2016) Combining multifractal analyses of digital mammograms and infrared thermograms to assist in early breast cancer diagnosis. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1760. AIP Publishing, Melville, p 020018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation Center Computer Assisted SurgeryUniversity LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations