Toward a real-time system for temporal enhanced ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
- 52 Downloads
We have previously proposed temporal enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) as a new paradigm for tissue characterization. TeUS is based on analyzing a sequence of ultrasound data with deep learning and has been demonstrated to be successful for detection of cancer in ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Our aim is to enable the dissemination of this technology to the community for large-scale clinical validation.
In this paper, we present a unified software framework demonstrating near-real-time analysis of ultrasound data stream using a deep learning solution. The system integrates ultrasound imaging hardware, visualization and a deep learning back-end to build an accessible, flexible and robust platform. A client–server approach is used in order to run computationally expensive algorithms in parallel. We demonstrate the efficacy of the framework using two applications as case studies. First, we show that prostate cancer detection using near-real-time analysis of RF and B-mode TeUS data and deep learning is feasible. Second, we present real-time segmentation of ultrasound prostate data using an integrated deep learning solution.
The system is evaluated for cancer detection accuracy on ultrasound data obtained from a large clinical study with 255 biopsy cores from 157 subjects. It is further assessed with an independent dataset with 21 biopsy targets from six subjects. In the first study, we achieve area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.94, 0.77, 0.94 and 0.92, respectively, for the detection of prostate cancer. In the second study, we achieve an AUC of 0.85.
Our results suggest that TeUS-guided biopsy can be potentially effective for the detection of prostate cancer.
KeywordsTemporal enhanced ultrasound Prostate cancer 3D slicer Real-time biopsy guidance
This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M (2016) Tensorflow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467
- 3.Anas EMA, Nouranian S, Mahdavi SS, Spadinger I, Morris WJ, Salcudean SE, Mousavi P, Abolmaesumi P (2017) Clinical target-volume delineation in prostate brachytherapy using residual neural networks. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 365–373Google Scholar
- 4.Azizi S, Bayat S, Yan P, Tahmasebi A, Nir G, Kwak JT, Xu S, Wilson S, Iczkowski KA, Lucia MS, goldenberg L, Salcudean SE, Pinto P, Wood B, Abolmaesumi P, Mousavi P (2017) Detection and grading of prostate cancer using temporal enhanced ultrasound: combining deep neural networks and tissue mimicking simulations. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(8):1293–1305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Azizi S, Imani F, Ghavidel S, Tahmasebi A, Wood B, Mousavi P, Abolmaesumi P (2016) Detection of prostate cancer using temporal sequences of ultrasound data: a large clinical feasibility study. IJCARS 11:947–56Google Scholar
- 6.Azizi S, Imani F, Kwak J.T, Tahmasebi A, Xu S, Yan P, Kruecker J, Turkbey B, Choyke P, Pinto P, Wood B, Mousavi P, Abolmaesumi P (2016) Classifying cancer grades using temporal ultrasound for transrectal prostate biopsy. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 653–661Google Scholar
- 7.Azizi S, Imani F, Zhuang B, Tahmasebi A, Kwak JT, Xu S, Uniyal N, Turkbey B, Choyke P, Pinto P, Wood B, Mousavi P, Abolmaesumi P (2015) Ultrasound-based detection of prostate cancer using automatic feature selection with deep belief networks. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 70–77Google Scholar
- 10.Daoud MI, Mousavi P, Imani F, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P (2013) Tissue classification using ultrasound-induced variations in acoustic backscattering features. IEEE TBME 60(2):310–320Google Scholar
- 11.Epstein JI, Feng Z, Trock BJ, Pierorazio PM (2012) Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades. Eur Urol 61(5):1019–1024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Feleppa EJ, Rondeau MJ, Lee P, Porter CR (2009) Prostate-cancer imaging using machine-learning classifiers: potential value for guiding biopsies, targeting therapy, and monitoring treatment. In: 2009 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium (IUS). IEEE, pp 527–529Google Scholar
- 16.Imani F, Abolmaesumi P, Gibson E, Khojaste A, Gaed M, Moussa M, Gomez JA, Romagnoli C, Leveridge M, Chang S (2015) Computer-aided prostate cancer detection using ultrasound RF time series: in vivo feasibility study. IEEE TMI 34(11):2248–2257Google Scholar
- 17.Imani F, Ramezani M, Nouranian S, Gibson E, Khojaste A, Gaed M, Moussa M, Gomez JA, Romagnoli C, Leveridge M (2015) Ultrasound-based characterization of prostate cancer using joint independent component analysis. IEEE TBME 62(7):1796–1804Google Scholar
- 18.Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J, Simpfendörfer T, Boxler S, Alammar K, Rieker P, Popeneciu VI, Roth W, Pahernik S (2013) Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 190(4):1380–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Mehrtash A, Pesteie M, Hetherington J, Behringer PA, Kapur T, Wells III WM, Rohling R, Fedorov A, Abolmaesumi P (2017) Deepinfer: open-source deep learning deployment toolkit for image-guided therapy. In: Proceedings of SPIE–the International Society for Optical Engineering, vol 10135. NIH Public AccessGoogle Scholar
- 24.Moradi M, Abolmaesumi P, Siemens DR, Sauerbrei EE, Boag AH, Mousavi P (2009) Augmenting detection of prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound images using SVM and RF time series. IEEE TBME 56(9):2214–2224Google Scholar
- 25.Moradi M, Mahdavi SS, Nir G, Jones EC, Goldenberg SL, Salcudean SE (2013) Ultrasound RF time series for tissue typing: first in vivo clinical results. In: SPIE medical imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 86701I-1–86701I-8Google Scholar
- 26.Oelze ML, O’Brien WD, Blue JP, Zachary JF (2004) Differentiation and characterization of rat mammary fibroadenomas and 4T1 mouse carcinomas using quantitative ultrasound imaging. IEEE TMI 23(6):764–771Google Scholar
- 28.Salcudean SE, French D, Bachmann S, Zahiri-Azar R (2006) Viscoelasticity modeling of the prostate region using vibro-elastography. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 389–396Google Scholar
- 30.Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Parnes HL, Linehan WM (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar