Advertisement

The linguistic validation process of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey - Italian Version (VHNSS-IT)

  • Marta MaddaloEmail author
  • Michela Buglione
  • Nadia Pasinetti
  • Luca Triggiani
  • Loredana Costa
  • Stefano M. Magrini
  • Barbara A. Murphy
RADIOTHERAPY
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To linguistically validate the Italian translation of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS), there is a patient-reported outcome measure to screen for symptoms in the head and neck cancer (HNC) patients population. The goal was to ensure conceptually equivalence with the original version and maintain clarity, ease of use and understanding.

Methods

We conducted a multi-step linguistic process (forward translation, backward translation and patient testing) to generate and validate an Italian translation of the VHNSS.

Results

Two intermediate Italian versions were created: The first Italian version was derived from a reconciliation of the three forward translations, and the second Italian version was derived from changes in the first version after the backward translation step. All investigators involved actively discussed possible solutions to produce a translated instrument that maintained a reading and comprehension level accessible by most respondents, without altering the meaning and content of the original source. During the patient testing step, only two patients reported problems with items comprehension and the rate of comprehension problems per single item was lower than expected. This phase allowed patients to give suggestion in order to make items clearer and easier to understand: 43% of patients proposed a revision of the survey during the face-to-face interview, and most of these suggestions were retained.

Conclusions

A valid multi-step process leads to the creation of the final version of the VHNSS-IT, a suitable instrument to screen for symptoms in the Italian HNC patients population and an official measurement tool that can be used in cooperative research group.

Keywords

Patient reported outcomes (PRO) Head and neck cancer Symptoms screening Radiotherapy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

All authors gratefully thank the 10-member team of reviewers for their precious help: Prof. A. Deganello and Dr. A. Paderno from the Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Prof. P. Bossi and Dr. S. Grisanti from the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy; Prof. F. Paiar from the Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Dr. D. Alterio from the Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Dr. L. Belgioia from the Radiation Oncology Department IRCCS San Martino Hospital and Health Science Department (DISSAL) University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Dr. M. Andreoli and R. Bertoli (dietician) from the Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy; C. Cominardi (nurse) from the Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Research involving human participants and/or animals: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Murphy BA, Gilbert J, Ridner SH (2007) Systemic and global toxicities of head and neck treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 7(7):1043–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alho OP, Teppo H, Mäntyselkä P, Kantola S (2006) Head and neck cancer in primary care: presenting symptoms and the effect of delayed diagnosis of cancer cases. CMAJ 174(6):779–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trotti A (2000) Toxicity in head and neck cancer: a review of trends and issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleeland CS, Sloan JA, ASCPRO Organizing Group (2010) Assessing the symptoms of cancer using patient-reported outcomes (ASCPRO): searching for standards. J Pain Symptom Manag 39(6):1077–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy BA, Dietrich MS, Wells N et al (2010) Reliability and validity of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey: a tool to assess symptom burden in patients treated with chemoradiation. Head Neck 32(1):26–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wild D, Grove A, Martin M et al (2005) Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health 8(2):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daniel WW (1999) Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 7th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV (2007) Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 30(4):459e467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polit DF, Beck CT (2006) The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 29(5):489e497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murphy BA (2009) Advances in quality of life and symptom management for head and neck cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol 21(3):242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkett VS, Cleeland CS (2007) Symptom burden in cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv 1(2):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lang H, France E, Williams B et al (2013) The psychological experience of living with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Psychooncology 22(12):2648–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ringash J, Bezjak A (2001) A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 23(3):201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy BA, Ridner S, Wells N, Dietrich M (2007) Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 62(3):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogers SN, Ahad SA, Murphy AP (2007) A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on ‘quality of life’ in head and neck cancer: 2000-2005. Oral Oncol 43(9):843–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rapoport Y, Kreitler S, Chaitchik S et al (1993) Psychosocial problems in head-and-neck cancer patients and their change with time since diagnosis. Ann Oncol 4:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morton RP (1995) Life-satisfaction in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 20:499–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    deBoer MF, Pruyn JF, van den Borne B, Knegt PP, Ryckman RM, Verwoerd CD (1995) Rehabilitation outcomes of long-term survivors treated for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 17:503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenthal DI, Mendoza TR, Chambers MS et al (2007) Measuring head and neck cancer symptom burden: the development and validation of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory, head and neck module. Head Neck 29(10):923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones HA, Hershock D, Machtay M et al (2006) Preliminary investigation of symptom distress in the head and neck patient population. Am J Clin Oncol 29:158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greco A, Orlandi E, Mirabile A et al (2015) Italian version of the M.D. Anderson symptom inventory-head and neck module: linguistic validation. Support Care Cancer 23(12):3465–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gotay CC, Kawamoto CT, Bottomley A, Efficace F (2008) The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1355–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Maddalo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michela Buglione
    • 1
  • Nadia Pasinetti
    • 2
  • Luca Triggiani
    • 1
  • Loredana Costa
    • 1
  • Stefano M. Magrini
    • 1
  • Barbara A. Murphy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyASST Spedali Civili di Brescia - Brescia UniversityBresciaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyOspedale di Esine – ASL Vallecamonica-SebinoEsineItaly
  3. 3.Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations