Advertisement

Caution in using 3D-EAUS as the first-line diagnostic tool in the preoperative work up for perianal fistulas

  • Rishi Philip MathewEmail author
  • Vimal Patel
  • Gavin Low
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

MRI is considered the de facto imaging modality for evaluating perianal fistulas, primarily due to its excellent soft tissue contrast, operator independence, multiplanar capabilities and excellent field of view. Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) is inferior to MRI in identifying and/or evaluating ischiorectal/supralevator tracks/extensions and therefore could end up providing incomplete and even inaccurate information (e.g. misclassification of tracks) to the surgeon, with a missed track potentially leading to recurrence of the disease.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, and all authors have provided their consent.

Ethical standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

References

  1. 1.
    Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Reginelli A, Monaco L, Sodano B, Tufano G, Tufano A, Maglio M, De Palma M, Di Martino N, Renzi A, Grassi R (2019) Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: tridimensional endoanalultrasound? magnetic resonance? both? Radiol Med 124(5):339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gage KL, Deshmukh S, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Zaheer A (2013) MRI of perianal fistulas: bridging the radiological-surgical divide. Abdom Imaging 38(5):1033–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9965-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yildirim N, Gökalp G, Öztürk E, Zorluoğlu A, Yilmazlar T, Ercan I, Savci G (2012) Ideal combination of MRI sequences for perianal fistula classification and the evaluation of additional findings for readers with varying levels of experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 18(1):11–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Halligan S, Cohen CR (2005) Value of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of three dimensional endoanal ultrasound in fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 48(1):141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF, del Hoyo LF, Velasco LG, de las Vacas MI, Marco Sanz AG, Paradela MM, Moreno EF (2012) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 32(1):175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations