Radiotherapy is one of the primary treatment options in cancer management. Modern radiotherapy includes complex processes requiring many different kinds of expertise. Among them, knowledge and skills are needed in clinical oncology, radiobiology, radiotherapy planning and simulation, dose measurement and calculation, radiation safety and medical physics. Radiation oncologists should assume the full and final responsibility for treatment, follow-up and supportive care of the patient. For all these activities, radiation oncologist should coordinate and collaborate with a team including different professionals: nurses, radiographers (RTT), clinical engineers, information system experts, taking advantage in particular of the dosimetry expertise of the medical physicist. Radiation therapy is widely recognized to be one of the safest areas of modern medicine, and errors are very rare. However, radiation protection recommendations developed at national level should comply with the EURATOM Directive 2013/59. This paper describes several contemporary and emerging concerns related to radioprotection in radiation therapy including quality and safety in external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, foetal dose, secondary malignancies, and the safety issues related to the new techniques and treatment strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
The authors agree with the content of the article and give consensus for publication.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Weber DC, Peguret N, Dipasquale G, Cozzi L (2009) Involvednode and involved-field volumetric modulated arc vs. fixed beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy for female patients with early-stage supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a comparative planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(5):1578–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Voong KR, McSpadden K, Pinnix CC et al (2014) Dosimetric advantages of a “butterfly” technique for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Radiat Oncol 15(9):94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutanzi KR, Lumen A, Koturbash I, Miousse IR (2016) Pediatric exposures to ionizing radiation: carcinogenic considerations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(11):1057CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. UNSCEAR; Vienna, Austria: 2013Google Scholar
Filippi AR, Vanoni V et al (2018) Intensity modulated radiation therapy and second cancer risk in adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100(1):17–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chung CS, Yock TI, Nelson K et al (2013) Incidence of second malignancies among patients treated with proton versus photon radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 6(4):411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/EuratomGoogle Scholar
Pawlicki T, Coffey M, Milosevic M (2017) Incident learning systems for radiation oncology: development and value at the local, national and international level. Clin Oncol 29(9):562–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar