Advertisement

La radiologia medica

, Volume 124, Issue 8, pp 777–782 | Cite as

Applying radiation protection and safety in radiotherapy

  • Stefano Maria Magrini
  • Nadia Pasinetti
  • Liliana Belgioia
  • Luca TriggianiEmail author
  • Mario Levis
  • Umberto Ricardi
  • Renzo Corvò
RADIOTHERAPY

Abstract

Radiotherapy is one of the primary treatment options in cancer management. Modern radiotherapy includes complex processes requiring many different kinds of expertise. Among them, knowledge and skills are needed in clinical oncology, radiobiology, radiotherapy planning and simulation, dose measurement and calculation, radiation safety and medical physics. Radiation oncologists should assume the full and final responsibility for treatment, follow-up and supportive care of the patient. For all these activities, radiation oncologist should coordinate and collaborate with a team including different professionals: nurses, radiographers (RTT), clinical engineers, information system experts, taking advantage in particular of the dosimetry expertise of the medical physicist. Radiation therapy is widely recognized to be one of the safest areas of modern medicine, and errors are very rare. However, radiation protection recommendations developed at national level should comply with the EURATOM Directive 2013/59. This paper describes several contemporary and emerging concerns related to radioprotection in radiation therapy including quality and safety in external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, foetal dose, secondary malignancies, and the safety issues related to the new techniques and treatment strategies.

Keywords

Radioprotection Radiotherapy Radiation exposure Radiation risk management 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

The authors agree with the content of the article and give consensus for publication.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Atun R, Jaffray DA, Barton MB et al (2015) Expanding global access to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 16(10):1153–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00222-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palazzi MF, Soatti C, Jereczek-Fossa BA et al (2018) Equipment, staffing, and provision of radiotherapy in Lombardy, Italy: results of three surveys performed between 2012 and 2016. Tumori 104(5):352–360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891618784800 (Epub 2018 Jul 9) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murphy MJ, Balter J, Balter S et al (2007) The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75. Med Phys 34(10):4041–4063CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaffray DA (2012) Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9(12):688–699.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.194 (Epub 2012 Nov 20) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A (2011) Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. Br J Radiol 84(1007):967–996.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/22373346 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weber DC, Peguret N, Dipasquale G, Cozzi L (2009) Involvednode and involved-field volumetric modulated arc vs. fixed beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy for female patients with early-stage supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a comparative planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(5):1578–1586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Voong KR, McSpadden K, Pinnix CC et al (2014) Dosimetric advantages of a “butterfly” technique for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for young female patients with mediastinal Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Radiat Oncol 15(9):94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao J, Xia Y, Kaminski J et al (2016) Treatment-related death during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0157455.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157455 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skowronek J (2017) Current status of brachytherapy in cancer treatment—short overview. J Contemp Brachyther 9(6):581–589.  https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.72607 Epub 2017 Dec 30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fellin G, Mirri MA, Santoro L et al (2016) Low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) as monotherapy for early stage prostate cancer in Italy: practice and outcome analysis in a series of 2237 patients from 11 institutions. Br J Radiol 89(1065):20150981.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150981 (Epub 2016 Jul 7) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    GEC-ESTRO Meeting Group Européen de Curiethérapie European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology volume 75, Supplement 1, pp S1–S63 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nath R, Rivard MJ, DeWerd LA et al (2016) Guidelines by the AAPM and GEC-ESTRO on the use of innovative brachytherapy devices and applications: report of Task Group 167. Med Phys 43(6):3178–3205.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4951734 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kutanzi KR, Lumen A, Koturbash I, Miousse IR (2016) Pediatric exposures to ionizing radiation: carcinogenic considerations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(11):1057CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall EJ (2009) Radiation biology for pediatric radiologists. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 1):S57–S64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1027-2 (Epub 2008 Dec 16) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. UNSCEAR; Vienna, Austria: 2013Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filippi AR, Vanoni V et al (2018) Intensity modulated radiation therapy and second cancer risk in adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100(1):17–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chung CS, Yock TI, Nelson K et al (2013) Incidence of second malignancies among patients treated with proton versus photon radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kal HB, Struikmans H (2005) Radiotherapy during pregnancy: fact and fiction. Lancet Oncol. 6(5):328–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kal HB, Struikmans H (2005) Radiotherapy during pregnancy: fact and fiction. Lancet Oncol 6:328–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feni E (2011) Cap.13, Section 2 pregnancy and radiation. Cancer in Pregnancy and Lactation: The Motherisk Guide. pp 69–78Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements (NCRP) recommends. https://ncrponline.org/program-areas/pac-4-radiation-protection-in-medicine
  23. 23.
    Vandenbroucke T, Verheecke M, Fumagalli M, Lok C, Amant F (2017) Effects of cancer treatment during pregnancy on fetal and child development. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 1(4):302–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30091-3 (Epub 2017 Sep 29) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 6(4):411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/EuratomGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Ganesh T (2014) Incident reporting and learning in radiation oncology: need of the hour. J Med Phys 39(4):203–205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pawlicki T, Coffey M, Milosevic M (2017) Incident learning systems for radiation oncology: development and value at the local, national and international level. Clin Oncol 29(9):562–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ford EC, Evans SB (2018) Incident learning in radiation oncology: a review. Med Phys 45(5):e100–e119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12800 (Epub 2018 Apr 11) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Maria Magrini
    • 1
  • Nadia Pasinetti
    • 2
  • Liliana Belgioia
    • 3
  • Luca Triggiani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mario Levis
    • 4
  • Umberto Ricardi
    • 4
  • Renzo Corvò
    • 3
  1. 1.Radiation Oncology DepartmentBrescia UniversityBresciaItaly
  2. 2.Radiation Oncology ServiceASST ValcamonicaEsineItaly
  3. 3.Radiation Oncology Department, San Martino Teaching HospitalGenova University (DISSAL)GenoaItaly
  4. 4.Department of OncologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations