Advertisement

Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both?

  • Antonio Brillantino
  • Francesca IacobellisEmail author
  • Alfonso Reginelli
  • Luigi Monaco
  • Biagio Sodano
  • Giuseppe Tufano
  • Antonio Tufano
  • Mauro Maglio
  • Maurizio De Palma
  • Natale Di Martino
  • Adolfo Renzi
  • Roberto Grassi
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the preoperative assessment of both simple and complex anorectal fistulas.

Methods

All the patients referred for the treatment of anal fistulas were enrolled in this study and underwent, as preoperative assessment, anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS and MR. The results of imaging evaluation were compared with surgical findings, considered as reference standard.

Results

During the study period, 124 patients operated on for anal fistulas underwent complete preoperative imaging assessment. Perfect agreement between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the anal fistulas’ severity grading was found (K = 1). The fistulas were classified as simple in 68/126 (53.9%) and complex in 58/126 (46.03%) cases, according to fistulas’ Parks’ classification and the most recent American Guidelines. In both simple and complex anal fistulas, 3D-EAUS did not show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P = 0.47; McNemar’s Chi-square test). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P = 0.041; McNemar’s Chi-square test), whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found.

Conclusion

In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas’ complete anatomy.

Keywords

3D-EAUS Endoanal ultrasound Magnetic resonance Anal fistulas Anal abscess Diagnostic accuracy 

Abbreviations

3D-EAUS

Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound

MR

Magnetic resonance

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Brunese L, Amitrano M, Gargano V, Pinto A, Vallone G, Grassi R, Rotondo A, Smaltino F (1996) Role of anal endosonography in inflammation and trauma of the anal canal. Radiol Med 92(6):742–747 (Italian) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams JG, Farrands PA, Williams AB, Taylor BA, Lunniss PJ, Sagar PM, Varma JS, George BD (2007) The treatment of anal fistula: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 4):18–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, Rafferty JL, Buie WD (2011) Standards practice task force of the American society of colon and rectal surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 54(12):1465–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Izzo G, Di Martino N, Grassi R, Renzi A (2014) Maintenance therapy with partially hydrolyzed guar gum in the conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure: results of a prospective, randomized study. Biomed Res Int 2014:964942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reginelli A, Mandato Y, Cavaliere C, Pizza NL, Russo A, Cappabianca S, Brunese L, Rotondo A, Grassi R (2012) Three-dimensional anal endosonography in depicting anal-canal anatomy. Radiol Med 117(5):759–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grassi R, Rotondo A, Catalano O, Amitrano M, Vallone G, Gargano V, Fanucci A (1995) Endoanal ultrasonography, defecography, and enema of the colon in the radiologic study of incontinence. Radiol Med 89(6):792–797PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pomerri F, Dodi G, Pintacuda G, Amadio L, Muzzio PC (2010) Anal endosonography and fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Radiol Med 115(5):771–783.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0524-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A et al (2012) A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 55:576–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lo Re G, Tudisca C, Vernuccio F, Picone D, Cappello M, Agnello F, Galia M, Galfano MC, Biscaldi E, Salerno S, Pinto A, Midiri M, Lagalla R (2016) MR imaging of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: sensitivity and specificity of STIR sequences. Radiol Med 121(4):243–251.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0603-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ognibene NM, Basile M, Di Maurizio M, Petrillo G, De Filippi C (2016) Features and perspectives of MR enterography for pediatric Crohn disease assessment. Radiol Med 121(5):362–377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0613-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foti PV, Farina R, Coronella M, Palmucci S, Ognibene N, Milone P, Conti Bellocchi C, Samperi L, Inserra G, Laghi A, Ettorre GC (2015) Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: evaluation of ileal inflammation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging and correlation with the Harvey–Bradshaw index. Radiol Med 120(7):585–594.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0502-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brunese L, Amitrano M, Gargano V, Vallone G, Grassi R, Rotondo A, Smaltino F (1996) Anal endosonography: the study technic and the correlations between the normal and echographic anatomy. Radiol Med 91(3):253–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emile SH, Magdy A, Youssef M, Thabet W, Abdelnaby M, Omar W, Khafagy W (2017) Utility of endoanal ultrasonography in assessment of primary and recurrent anal fistulas and for detection of associated anal sphincter defects. J Gastrointest Surg 21(11):1879–1887.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3574-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deen KI, Williams JG, Hutchinson R, Keighley MR, Kumar D (1994) Fistulas in ano: endoanal ultrasonographic assessment assists decision making for surgery. Gut 35(3):391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Tarroni D, Cohen CR (2004) Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology 233(3):674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A, Costamagna G, Doglietto GB (2005) Endoanal ultrasound-guided surgery for anal fistula. Endoscopy 37(8):722–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Subasinghe D, Samarasekera DN (2010) Comparison of preoperative endoanal ultrasonography with intraoperative findings for fistula in ano. World J Surg 34(5):1123–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weisman N, Abbas MA (2008) Prognostic value of endoanal ultrasound for fistula-in-ano: a retrospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1089–1092.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9284-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Di Sarno G, D’Aniello F, Izzo D, Paladino F, De Palma M, Castriconi M, Grassi R, Di Martino N, Renzi A (2015) Role of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the preoperative assessment of perianal sepsis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(4):535–542.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2167-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding JH, Bi LX, Zhao K, Feng YY, Zhu J, Zhang B, Yin SH, Zhao YJ (2015) Impact of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound on the outcome of anal fistula surgery: a prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis 17(12):1104–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM (2015) Commentary on ‘impact of 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound on the outcome of anal fistula surgery: a prospective cohort study’. Colorectal Dis 17(12):1112–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13140 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, Kessels AG, Vliegen RF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: Does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218(1):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alabiso ME, Iasiello F, Pellino G, Iacomino A, Roberto L, Pinto A, Riegler G, Selvaggi F, Reginelli A (2016) 3D-EAUS and MRI in the activity of anal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016:1895694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 63(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh K, Singh N, Thukral C, Singh KP, Bhalla V (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of perianal fistulae with surgical correlation. J Clin Diagn Res 8:RC01–RC04PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sun MR, Smith MP, Kane RA (2008) Current techniques in imaging of fistula in ano: three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29(6):454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    West RL, Zimmerman DD, Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Hop WC, Schouten WR, Kuipers EJ, Felt-Bersma RJ (2003) Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10):1407–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gustafsson UM, Kahvecioglu B, Aström G, Ahlström H, Graf W (2001) Endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of anal fistula: a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 3(3):189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sabir N, Sungurtekin U, Erdem E, Nessar M (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging with rectal Gd-DTPA: new tool for the diagnosis of perianal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 15(5–6):317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scholefield JH, Berry DP, Armitage NC, Wastie ML (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula in ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 12(5):276–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Fernandes GO, Buchen G, Kenmoti VT, Soares Gdos S, Holanda Ede C (2011) Anatomic characteristics of anal fistula on three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 54(4):460–466.  https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182060c84 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Holanda Ede C, Barreto RG, Oliveira L (2010) The role of 3-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in the assessment of anterior transsphincteric fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1035–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181dce163 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Iacobellis F, Berritto D, Fleischmann D, Gagliardi G, Brillantino A, Mazzei MA, Grassi R (2014) CT findings in acute, subacute, and chronic ischemic colitis: suggestions for diagnosis. Biomed Res Int 2014:895248.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/895248 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mazzei MA, Guerrini S, Cioffi Squitieri N, Genovese EA, Mazzei FG, Volterrani L (2012) Diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia/infarction in the era of multislice CT. Recent Prog Med 103(11):435–437.  https://doi.org/10.1701/1166.12884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Carbonetti F, Cremona A, Carusi V, Guidi M, Iannicelli E, Di Girolamo M, Sergi D, Clarioni A, Baio G, Antonelli G, Fratini L, David V (2016) The role of contrast enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis and comparison with the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC). Radiol Med 121(2):106–121.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0575-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Brillantino
    • 1
  • Francesca Iacobellis
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alfonso Reginelli
    • 2
  • Luigi Monaco
    • 3
  • Biagio Sodano
    • 4
  • Giuseppe Tufano
    • 4
  • Antonio Tufano
    • 4
  • Mauro Maglio
    • 1
  • Maurizio De Palma
    • 1
  • Natale Di Martino
    • 5
  • Adolfo Renzi
    • 6
  • Roberto Grassi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery“A. Cardarelli” HospitalNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of Surgery“Villa Esther” HospitalAvellinoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, “Pellegrini” HospitalASL NA1 CentroNaplesItaly
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
  6. 6.“Villa delle Querce” HospitalNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations