Advertisement

Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization

  • Alessandro Motta
  • Giuseppe Caltabiano
  • Marco Pizzarelli
  • Giovanni Failla
  • Dragos Botezatu
  • Horia Muresanu
  • Pietro Foti
  • Sandro La Vignera
  • Rosita Condorelli
  • Stefano Palmucci
  • Antonio Basile
VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Varicocele is a relatively complex pathology that affects the pampiniform plexus of veins in the spermatic cord. Modern treatment involves both urological/surgical and interventional procedures. Our objective is to compare outcomes of conventional laparoscopic ligation (LL) and occluding balloon embolization (OBE) a percutaneous interventional procedure.

Materials and methods

We treated retrospectively a total of 98 patients, divided in two cohorts; arm A with 48 and arm B with 50 patients. Arm A patients underwent LL, while arm B ones were treated in interventional radiology suite, via OBE method. No comorbidities were reported, especially scrotal ones. Hence, all patients have been asked to respect 3 and 6 months’ follow-up, clinical examination and ultrasonography were performed. Age range of the entire sample: 15–45 years old, with average of 28 years. The study involved two European centers. We performed a comparative analysis (Fisher’s test) of intra-operative time, hospitalization and patient’s postoperative recovery time.

Results and limitations

Outcomes have been in line with the recent literature ones, allowing the occluding balloon embolization a small advantage for quicker operative average time, hospitalization needed and full recovery to normal activities for the patient. Main limitation was the unfeasibility of cost-effectiveness analysis due to national differences, limited sample and lack of complete semen analysis pre- and postoperative.

Conclusion

Both OBE and LL are safe and effective procedures in the treatment of varicocele, conceding OBE a slight advantage in terms of hospital stay and full recovery to normal activity of patients.

Keywords

Varicocele Laparoscopic ligation Occluding balloon Embolization Interventional radiology 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Hamada A, Esteves SC, Agarwal A (2016) Varicocele and male infertility, vol 1. SpringerBriefs in reproductive biology. Springer, Berlin, p 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A (2001) Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 7(5):473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM (2011) Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol 59:455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kantartzi PD, Goulis ChD, Goulis GD, Papadimas I (2007) Male infertility and varicocele: myths and reality. Hippokratia 11(3):99–104PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tu D, Glassberg KI (2010) Surgery illustrated—surgical atlas, laparoscopic varicocelectomy. BJU Int 106:1094–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basile A, Failla G, La Vignera S et al (2014) Left spermatic vein retrograde sclerosis: comparison between sclerosant agent injection through a diagnostic catheter versus through an occluding balloon catheter. Radiol Med 120:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sarteschi LM, Menchini Fabris GM (2003) Ecografia andrologica. Athena audiovisuals, ModenaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bechara CF, Weakley SM, Kougias P et al (2009) Percutaneous treatment of varicocele with microcoil embolization: comparison of treatment outcome with laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Vascular 17(Suppl 3):S129–S136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halpern J, Mittal S, Pereira K et al (2016) Percutaneous embolization of varicocele: technique, indications, relative contraindications, and complications. Asian J Androl 18:234–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grosso M, Balderi A, Antonietti A et al (2015) Endovascular sclerotherapy for male varicoceles: a retrospective analysis of 1619 patients. Austin J Surg 2(2):1051Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zanghí G, Di Stefano G, Furci M et al (2004) Surgical treatment of varicocele in day-surgery: our experience. G Chir 25(8–9):287–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Xia SJ, Liu ZH et al (2014) Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 17:74PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iaccarino V, Venetucci P (2012) Interventional radiology of male varicocele: current status. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35:1263–12802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kroese ACJ, de Lange NM, Collins J, Evers JLH (2012) Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pieri S, Agresti P, Fiocca G et al (2006) Phlebographic classification of anatomic variants in the right internal spermatic vein confluence. Radiol Med 111:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gioppo A, Melchiorre F, Azzeroni R et al (2014) Analysis of radiation dose in varicocele embolization using a last generation C-arm: which risk for hereditary line?  https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2014/c-2178
  17. 17.
    Gazzera C, Rampado O, Savio L et al (2006) Radiological treatment of male varicocele: technical, clinical, seminal and dosimetric aspects. Radiol Med 111:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verstandig AG, Shamieh B, Shraibman V, Raveh D (2015) Radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopic procedures: left varicocele embolization as a model. Eur Radiol 25:1639–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3556-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Motta
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Caltabiano
    • 1
  • Marco Pizzarelli
    • 1
  • Giovanni Failla
    • 2
  • Dragos Botezatu
    • 3
  • Horia Muresanu
    • 3
  • Pietro Foti
    • 4
  • Sandro La Vignera
    • 4
  • Rosita Condorelli
    • 4
  • Stefano Palmucci
    • 4
  • Antonio Basile
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Interventional Radiology“ARNAS” Garibaldi HospitalCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Diagnostica per Immagini e Radiologia InterventisticaAzienda Ospedaliera per l’Emergenza “Cannizzaro”CataniaItaly
  3. 3.Vasile Goldis Western UniversityAradRomania
  4. 4.Department of Radiology and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario Gaspare RodolicoAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio EmanueleCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations