Advertisement

La radiologia medica

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 94–102 | Cite as

Diagnostic imaging of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours (GI-NETs): relationship between MDCT features and 2010 WHO classification

  • Giulia Grazzini
  • Ginevra Danti
  • Diletta Cozzi
  • Monica Marina Lanzetta
  • Gloria Addeo
  • Massimo Falchini
  • Antonella Masserelli
  • Silvia Pradella
  • Vittorio MieleEmail author
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

We aimed to present our series of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours (GI-NETs) in order to illustrate and highlight the associated contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) features. We also attempted to identify a relationship between MDCT imaging and the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system.

Materials and methods

We selected all patients with pathologically proven GI-NETs diagnosed between January 2010 and August 2017. Only patients undergone contrast-enhanced MDCT imaging in the immediate preoperative period were included in our study. Later, two expert radiologists retrospectively assessed MDCT intestinal and extra-intestinal signs. We also analysed the relationship between MDCT imaging and the 2010 WHO classification.

Results

A total of 20 patients (13 males, 7 females, age range 37–89 years, mean age 69.9 years) were included in our study. The majority of GI-NETs (85%) occurred in the small bowel and mainly in the terminal ileum. Forty-five percentage of our GI-NETs were diagnosed after an access to emergency medical service for obstruction symptoms or gastrointestinal bleeding. Regarding intestinal signs, 15/20 patients showed an intraluminal nodular mass and 5/20 a wall thickening. Extra-intestinal signs were present in 75% of cases. Desmoplastic reaction and lymph nodes metastases were significantly correlated with higher grade of GI-NETs.

Conclusions

The majority of GI-NETs appears as intraluminal mass often associated with extra-intestinal signs. We found a significantly correlation between higher grade of GI-NETs and extra-intestinal signs. MDCT imaging may be useful in predicting the pathological classification of GI-NETs.

Keywords

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours Multi-detector computed tomography Intestinal signs Extra-intestinal signs Pathological classification 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article. No funding was received for this study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involvement human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Klöppel G, Perren A, Heitz PU (2004) The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cell system and its tumors: the WHO classification. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1014:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsai SD, Kawamoto S, Wolfgang CL, Hruban RH, Fishman EK (2015) Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: retrospective evaluation of CT imaging features and pattern of metastatic disease on dual-phase MDCT with pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 40:1121–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahdaleh FS, Lorenzen A, Rajput M et al (2013) The value of preoperative imaging in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1912–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rockall AG, Reznek RH (2007) Imaging of neuroendocrine tumours (CT/MR/US). Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 21:43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganeshan D, Bhosale P, Yang T, Kundra V (2013) Imaging features of carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:773–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klöppel G (2017) Neuroendocrine neoplasm: dichotomy, origin and classifications. Visc Med 33:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J (2017) WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klimstra DS (2016) Pathologic classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 30:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rindi G, Petrone G, Inzani F (2014) The 2010 WHO classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: a critical appraisal four years after its introduction. Endocr Pathol 25:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, vol 3, 4th edn. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hristova L, Placé V, Nemeth J, Boudiaf M, Laurent V, Soyer P (2012) Small bowel tumors: spectrum of findings on 64-section CT enteroclysis with pathologic correlation. Clin Imaging 36:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sundin A, Arnold R, Baudin E et al (2017) ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in neuroendocrine tumors: radiological, nuclear medicine and hybrid imaging. Neuroendocrinology 105:212–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tamm EP, Kim EE, Ng CS (2007) Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 21:409–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Fishman EK et al (2011) Imaging of malignant neoplasms of the mesenteric small bowel: new trends and perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 80:10–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taal BG, Visser O (2004) Epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 80(Suppl 1):3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Ko CY (2004) Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg 240:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A et al (2008) One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 26:3063–3072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaltsas GA, Besser GM, Grossman AB (2004) The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Rev 25:458–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Metz DC, Jensen RT (2008) Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 135:1469–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I, Zikusoka MN, Shapiro MD (2005) Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology 128:1717–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oberg KE (2012) The management of neuroendocrine tumours: current and future medical therapy options. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 24:282–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dohan A, El Fattach H, Barat M et al (2016) Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel: evaluation with MR-enterography. Clin Imaging 40:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman F et al (2010) Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman F, Carneiro F, Hruban R, Theise N (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 13–14Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhu H, Ying L, Tang W, Yang X, Sun B (2017) Can MDCT or EUS features predict the histopathological grading scheme of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms? Radiol Med 122:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Grazzini
    • 1
  • Ginevra Danti
    • 1
  • Diletta Cozzi
    • 1
  • Monica Marina Lanzetta
    • 1
  • Gloria Addeo
    • 1
  • Massimo Falchini
    • 1
  • Antonella Masserelli
    • 1
  • Silvia Pradella
    • 1
  • Vittorio Miele
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations