The pathology of soft tissue sarcomas
- 296 Downloads
Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies exhibiting mesenchymal differentiation with an overall incidence of around 5/100,000/year. Rarity and morphologic heterogeneity significantly affect diagnostic accuracy; therefore, expertise can be achieved only through access to large number of cases. Soft tissue sarcomas are currently classified on the basis of the 2013 WHO classification of soft tissue tumors that integrate conventional morphology with immunohistochemistry and molecular genetics. The morphologic diagnosis of sarcoma relies on the evaluation as well as the integration of four main features: the shape of the neoplastic cells; the pattern of growth; the quality of the background; the architecture of the vascular network. Immunohistochemical characterization plays a key role in the diagnostic workup of soft tissue sarcomas. The majority of classic differentiation markers tend to show good sensitivity, however, associated with rather limited specificity, making interpretation in context with morphology mandatory. Molecular genetics is increasingly used for diagnostic purposes to distinguish specific subtypes of sarcomas, to support diagnosis in non-canonical clinical presentations and also to distinguish true sarcomas from benign mimickers. With many exceptions, histologic typing does not provide sufficient information for predicting the clinical course of the disease and, therefore, grading systems based on histological parameters were introduced to provide a more accurate estimation of the degree of malignancy of tumors. The three-tiered system devised by the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) systems is widely adopted; however, several limitations exist that have led to the development of prognostic nomograms that incorporate the specific histotype as one of the relevant parameters.
KeywordsSoft tissue sarcoma Immunohistochemistry Molecular genetics
This study was not funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
AP Dei Tos has received speaker honoraria from PFIZER, Lilly Oncology; PharmaMar. M. Sbaraglia as received a speaker honorarium from PharmaMar.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F (eds) (2013) Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th edn. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F (eds) (2002) Pathology and genetics of tumors of soft tissue and bone. WHO classification of tumours. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Electronic address: email@example.com; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2017) Comprehensive and integrated genomic characterization of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cell 171:950–965.e28Google Scholar
- 12.Schaefer IM, Cote GM, Hornick JL (2018) Contemporary sarcoma diagnosis, genetics and genomics. J Clin Oncol 36:101–110Google Scholar
- 15.Sirvent N, Coindre JM, Maire G et al (2007) Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1476–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Casali PG, Dei Tos AP, Gronchi A (2015) Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. In: Rosenberg SA, DeVita VT, Hellman S (eds) De Vita, Hellman, Rosenberg’s cancer. Principles and practice of oncology, 10th edn. Wolters Kluver, Philadelphia, pp 745–756Google Scholar
- 26.Callegaro D, Miceli R, Bonvalot S et al (2016) Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 1:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar