Diagnostic performance of shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography for labral tears having surgery as reference: comparison of high-resolution isotropic 3D sequence (THRIVE) with standard protocol
To compare the diagnostic performance of T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (THRIVE) sequence with that of a standard protocol for direct shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) for the diagnosis of superior labral anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) and Bankart lesions, using arthroscopy findings as a reference standard.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively studied 84 patients who underwent direct shoulder 3T MRA using THRIVE and two-dimensional three-plane proton-density fat-suppressed (2D-PD-FS) sequences. One reviewer evaluated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a quantitative image quality. Other two reviewers independently evaluated the subjective image noise, image sharpness, and radiologic diagnosis as qualitative image quality. Arthroscopic surgical findings were considered the reference standard. Wilcoxon rank sum, Chi-square/Fisher’s exact, and DeLong’s tests, as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate differences between THRIVE and 2D-PD-FS images.
THRIVE images had significantly higher CNR (p < 0.001), and subjective ratings of image noise (p = 0.009) and sharpness (p = 0.039) than 2D-PD-FS images (p < 0.001). THRIVE images had similar (p ≥ 0.18) diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 93.0–97.2%; specificity, 95.8–100%; accuracy, 95.2–97.6%) for the diagnosis of SLAP and Bankart lesions with excellent agreement (ICC = 0.898–0.942) when compared to 2D-PD-FS images (sensitivity, 86.1–91.7%; specificity, 93.8–95.8%; accuracy, 90.5–92.9%; agreement, ICC = 0.782–0.858). The scan time was reduced by 69% for THRIVE sequence compared to 2D-PD-FS sequence (2 min 40 s vs. 8 min 40 s).
The THRIVE sequence may be helpful in the diagnosis of SLAP and Bankart lesions, and may be routinely used during direct shoulder 3T MRA.
KeywordsT1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation Direct shoulder MR arthrography SLAP lesion Bankart lesion Comparative study
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In addition, as this was a retrospective study we state that for this type of study formal consent is not required.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Messina C, Silvestri E, Tagliafico AS (2018) How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5208-y [Epub ahead of print] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hussain SM (2008) UNMC advances 3.0T abdominal imaging. Field Strength Issue 35:8–13Google Scholar
- 22.Park HJ, Lee SY, Rho MH, Kwon HJ, Kim MS, Chung EC (2015) The usefulness of the three-dimensional enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation MR in the evaluation of shoulder pathology: comparison with two-dimensional enhanced T1 fat saturation MR. Br J Radiol 88:20140830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Park SY, Lee IS, Park SK, Cheon SJ, Ahn JM, Song JW (2014) Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic and conventional MR arthrography with respect to the diagnosis of rotator cuff and labral lesions: focus on isotropic fat-suppressed proton density and VIBE sequences. Clin Radiol 69:e173–e182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar