Analysis of CT features and quantitative texture analysis in patients with thymic tumors: correlation with grading and staging
- 196 Downloads
To evaluate potential relationship between qualitative CT features, quantitative texture analysis (QTA), histology, WHO staging, Masaoka classification and myasthenic syndrome in patients with thymic tumors.
Materials and methods
Sixteen patients affected by histologically proven thymic tumors were retrospectively included in the study population. Clinical information, with special regard to myasthenic syndrome and serological positivity of anti-AchR antibodies, were recorded. Qualitative CT evaluation included the following parameters: (a) location; (b) tumor edges; (c) necrosis; (d) pleural effusion; (e) metastases; (f) chest wall infiltration; (g) tumor margins. QTA included evaluation of “Mean” (M), “Standard Deviation” (SD), “Kurtosis” (K), “Skewness” (S), “Entropy” (E), “Shape from Texture” (TX_sigma) and “average of positive pixels” (MPP). Pearson–Rho test was used to evaluate the relationship of continuous non-dichotomic parameters, whereas Mann–Whitney test was used for dichotomic parameters.
Histological evaluation demonstrated thymoma in 12 cases and thymic carcinoma in 4 cases. Tumor necrosis was significantly correlated with QTA Mean (p = 0.0253), MPP (p = 0.0417), S (p = 0.0488) and K (p = 0.0178). WHO staging was correlated with Mean (p = 0.0193), SD (p = 0.0191) and MPP (p = 0.0195). Masaoka classification was correlated with Mean (p = 0.0322), MPP (p = 0.0315), skewness (p = 0.0433) and Kurtosis (p = 0.0083). Myasthenic syndrome was significantly associated with Mean (p = 0.0211) and MPP (p = 0.0261), whereas tumor size was correlated with Mean (p = 0.0241), entropy (p = 0.0177), MPP (p = 0.0468), skewness (p = 0.009) and Kurtosis (p = 0.006).
Our study demonstrates significant relationship between radiomics parameters, histology, grading and clinical manifestations of thymic tumors.
KeywordsQuantitative texture analysis Computed tomography Thymic neoplasm Masaoka WHO staging system
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Colen R, Foster I, Gatenby R, Giger ME, Gillies R, Gutman D, Heller M, Jain R, Madabhushi A, Madhavan S, Napel S, Rao A, Saltz J, Tatum J, Verhaak R, Whitman G (2014) NCI workshop report: clinical and computational requirements for correlating imaging phenotypes with genomics signatures. Transl Oncol 7(5):556–569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Jain R, Poisson LM, Gutman D, Scarpace L, Hwang SN, Holder CA, Wintermark M, Rao A, Colen RR, Kirby J, Freymann J, Jaffe CC, Mikkelsen T, Flanders A (2014) Outcome prediction in patients with glioblastoma by using imaging, clinical, and genomic biomarkers: focus on the nonenhancing component of the tumor. Radiology 272(2):484–493CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Farber NJ, Kim CJ, Modi PK (2017) Renal cell carcinoma: the search for a reliable biomarker. ransl. Cancer Res 6(3):620–632Google Scholar
- 7.Rizzo S, Petrella F, Buscarino V, De Maria F, Raimondi S, Barberis M, Fumagalli C, Spitaleri G, Rampinelli C, De Marinis F, Spaggiari L, Bellomi M (2015) CT radiogenomic characterization of EGFR, K-RAS, and ALK mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Radiol 26(1):32–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.De Cecco CN, Ganeshan B, Ciolina M, Rengo M, Meinel FG, Musio D, De Felice F, Raffetto N, Tombolini V, Laghi A (2015) Texture analysis as imaging biomarker of tumoral response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients studied with 3-T magnetic resonance. Invest Radiol 50(4):239–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Janssen MH, Ollers MC, van Stiphout RG, Riedl RG, van den Bogaard J, Buijsen J, Lambin P, Lammering G (2010) Blood glucose level normalization and accurate timing improves the accuracy of PET-based treatment response predictions in rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 95(2):203–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Gonzales RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 17.Chen CH, Pau LF, Wang PSP (eds) (1998) The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, pp 207–248Google Scholar