Quantitative Approaches in Adaptation Strategies to Cope with Increased Temperatures Following Climate Change in Potato Crop

  • R. K. SrivastavaEmail author
  • Arunbabu Talla
  • D. K. Swain
  • R. K. Panda


Temperatures have a major effect on potato crop growth and yield attributes during the crop growing season. In this study, the SUBSTOR-Potato model was used to simulate the potato crop growth and yield in a sub-tropical region of West Bengal comprising of three districts, namely West Medinipur, Bankura and Birbhum in India. Also, the effect of temperature and planting dates scenario on potato crop growth was evaluated by using 30 years historical weather data of the aforesaid districts. Field experiments were conducted on potato crops of cultivar Kufri Jyoti under two planting dates (10th and 25th of December) and different fertilizer treatments in the years 2013–2014 and 2014–2015, respectively. The statistical results showed the satisfactory performance of the model with an R2 of 0.82 to 0.98 and d-stat of 0.94 to 0.98 for the year 2013–2014 and an R2 of 0.89 to 0.98 and d-stat of 0.97 to 0.98 for the year 2014–2015. Evaluation of planting dates with past 30 years historical data showed planting dates 20th and 30th of November resulted in average higher yield than planting dates 10th, 25th and 30th of December, respectively, in current climate scenario. Furthermore, the study suggests that amending the planting dates is an effective climate change adaptation strategy for reducing the effect of temperature on the yield of a potato crop in the near future.


Planting dates Potato SUBSTOR model Temperature Yield 



The study was conducted under the Project ‘Forecasting of Agricultural output using space, agro-meteorology and land based observation’, which is financed and sponsored by the India Meteorology Department and Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India.


  1. Arora VK, Nath JC, Singh CB (2013) Analyzing potato response to irrigation and nitrogen regimes in a sub-tropical environment using SUBSTOR-Potato model. Agric Water Manag 124:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdrabbo MA, Khalil AA, Hassanien MK, Abou-Hadid AF (2010) Sensitivity of potato yield to climate change. J Appl Sci Res 6(6):751–755Google Scholar
  3. Behera SK, Panda RK (2009) Integrated management of irrigation water and fertilizers for wheat crop using field experiments and simulation modeling. Agric Water Manag 96(11):1532–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daccache A, Weatherhead EK, Stalham MA, Knox JW (2011) Impacts of climate change on irrigated potato production in a humid climate. Agric For Meteorol 151(12):1641–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. FAO (2013) FAOSTAT database (
  6. Griffin TS, Johnson BS, Ritchie JT (1993) A simulation model for potato growth and development: SUBSTOR-Potato Version 2.0. IBSNAT Research Project Series 02, Honolulu, Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Halder D, Panda R K, Srivastava RK, Kheroar S, Singh SP (2016) Stochastic analysis of rainfall and its application in appropriate planning and management for Eastern India Agriculture. Water Policy, wp2016240Google Scholar
  8. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes 10:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hijmans RJ (2003) The effect of climate change on global potato production. Am J Potato Res 80(4):271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoogenboom G, Jones JW, Wilkens PW, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Hunt LA, Singh U, Lizaso JL, White JW, Uryasev O, Royce FS, Ogoshi R, Gijsman AJ, Tsuji GY, Koo J (2012) Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.5 [CD-ROM], University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoogenboom G (2000) Contribution of Agrometeorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications. Agric For Meteorol 103:137–157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kashyap PS, Panda RK (2003) Effect of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agric Water Manag 59(1):49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kawakami J, Iwama K, Jitsuyama Y (2005) Effects of planting date on the growth and yield of two potato cultivars grown from microtubersand conventional seed tubers. Plant production science 8(1):74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleinwechter U, Gastelo M, Ritchie J, Nelson G, Asseng S (2016) Simulating cultivar variations in potato yields for contrasting environments. Agric Syst 145:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klepper O, Rouse DI (1991) A procedure to reduce parameter uncertainty for complex models by comparison with real system output illustrated on a potato growth model. Agric Syst Jan 1;36(4):375–395Google Scholar
  17. Lobell DB, Sibley A, Ortiz-Monasterio JI (2012) Extreme heat effects on wheat senescence in India. Nat Clim Chang 2(3):186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pandit A, Lal B, Rana RK (2015) An assessment of potato contract farming in West Bengal state, India. Potato Res 58(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pereira A, Nova NV (2008) Potato maximum yield as affected by crop parameters and climatic factors in Brazil. HortScience 43(5):1611–1614Google Scholar
  20. Raymundo R, Asseng S, Prassad R, Kleinwechter U, Concha J, Condori B, Bowen W, Wolf J, Olesen JE, Dong Q, Zotarelli L (2016) Performance of the SUBSTOR-potato model across contrasting growing conditions. Field Crop ResGoogle Scholar
  21. Ritchie JT, Griffin TS, Johnson BS (1995) Substor functional model of potato growth, development and yield. In: Kabat P, et al (eds) Modelling and parameterization of the soil – plant – atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen Pers., Wageningen, pp 401–435Google Scholar
  22. Rykaczewska K (2015) The effect of high temperature occurring in subsequent stages of plant development on potato yield and tuber physiological defects. Am J Potato Res 92(3):339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Satapathy SS, Swain DK, Herath S (2014) Field experiments and simulation to evaluate rice cultivar adaptation to elevated carbon dioxide and temperature in sub-tropical India. Eur J Agron 54:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saxena R, Mathur P (2013) Analysis of potato production performance and yield variability in India. Potato J 40(1):38–44Google Scholar
  25. Soler CMT, Sentelhas PC, Hoogenboom G (2007) Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment. Eur J Agron 27(2):165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Srivastava RK, Panda RK, Halder D (2017) Effective crop evapotranspiration measurement using time-domain reflectometry technique in a sub-humid region. Volume 129, Issue 3–4, pp 1211–1225, Theor Appl Climatol, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  27. Srivastava RK, Panda RK, Chakraborty A, Halder D (2018a) Enhancing grain yield, biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of maize by varying planting dates and nitrogen rate under rainfed and irrigated conditions, Volume 221, Pages 339–349, Field Crop Research, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  28. Srivastava RK, Panda RK, Chakraborty A, Halder D (2018b) Comparison of actual evapotranspiration of irrigated maize in a sub-humid region using four different canopy resistance based approaches. Agric Water Manag, Elsevier 202:156–165Google Scholar
  29. Šťastná M, Toman F, Dufkova J (2010) Usage of SUBSTOR model in potato yield prediction. Agric Water Manag 97(2):286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Struik PC, Ewing EE (1995) Crop physiology of potato (Solanum tuberosum): responses to photoperiod and temperature relevant to crop modelling. In: Potato ecology and modelling of crops under conditions limiting growth. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tadesse M, Lommen WJM, Struik PC (2001) Development of micropropagated potato plants over three phases of growth as affected by temperature in different phases. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci 49(1):53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Travasso MI, Caldiz DO, Saluzzo JA (1996) Yield prediction using the SUBSTOR-potato model under Argentinian conditions. Potato Res 39(2):305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trehan SP, Upadhayay NC, Sud KC, Kumar Manoj, Jatav MK (2008) Nutrient Management in Potato, Central Potato Research Institute (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) (
  34. Tubiello FN, Rosenzweig C, Goldberg RA, Jagtap S, Jones JW (2002) Effects of climate change on US crop production: simulation results using two different GCM scenarios. Part I: wheat, potato, maize, and citrus. Clim Res 20(3):259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vashisht BB, Nigon T, Mulla DJ, Rosen C, Xu H, Twine T, Jalota SK (2015) Adaptation of water and nitrogen management to future climates for sustaining potato yield in Minnesota: field and simulation study. Agric Water Manag 152:198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheeler RM, Steffen KL, Tibbitts TW, Palta JP (1986) Utilization of potatoes for life support systems II. The effects of temperature under 24-h and 12-h photoperiods. American potato journal 63(11):639–647Google Scholar
  37. Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Ellis RH, Porter JR, Vara Prasad PV (2000) Temperature variability and the yield of annual crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolf J (2002) Comparison of two potato simulation models under climate change. II. Application of climate change scenarios. Clim Res 21(2):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association for Potato Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Srivastava
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arunbabu Talla
    • 1
  • D. K. Swain
    • 1
  • R. K. Panda
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural and Food Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.School of InfrastructureIndian Institute of TechnologyBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations