Advertisement

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 676–698 | Cite as

A Bayesian Sequential Learning Framework to Parameterise Continuum Models of Melanoma Invasion into Human Skin

  • Alexander P. Browning
  • Parvathi Haridas
  • Matthew J. SimpsonEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

We present a novel framework to parameterise a mathematical model of cell invasion that describes how a population of melanoma cells invades into human skin tissue. Using simple experimental data extracted from complex experimental images, we estimate three model parameters: (i) the melanoma cell proliferation rate, \(\lambda \); (ii) the melanoma cell diffusivity, D; and (iii) \(\delta \), a constant that determines the rate that melanoma cells degrade the skin tissue. The Bayesian sequential learning framework involves a sequence of increasingly sophisticated experimental data from: (i) a spatially uniform cell proliferation assay; (ii) a two-dimensional circular barrier assay; and (iii) a three-dimensional invasion assay. The Bayesian sequential learning approach leads to well-defined parameter estimates. In contrast, taking a naive approach that attempts to estimate all parameters from a single set of images from the same experiment fails to produce meaningful results. Overall, our approach to inference is simple-to-implement, computationally efficient, and well suited for many cell biology phenomena that can be described by low-dimensional continuum models using ordinary differential equations and partial differential equations. We anticipate that this Bayesian sequential learning framework will be relevant in other biological contexts where it is challenging to extract detailed, quantitative biological measurements from experimental images and so we must rely on using relatively simple measurements from complex images.

Keywords

Cell invasion Melanoma Invasion assay Cancer Bayesian inference 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Australian Research Council (DP170100474). We appreciate helpful comments from David Warne, and two anonymous referees.

Supplementary material

11538_2018_532_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (350 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 350 KB)

References

  1. Anderson ARA, Quaranta V (2008) Integrative mathematical oncology. Nat Rev Cancer 8:227–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ (2002) Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:2025–2035Google Scholar
  3. Bowden LG, Maini PK, Moulton DE, Tang JB, Wang XT, Liu PY, Byrne HM (2014) An ordinary differential equation model for full thickness wounds and the effects of diabetes. J Theor Biol 361:87–100CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning AP, McCue SW, Simpson MJ (2017) A Bayesian computational approach to explore the optimal duration of a cell proliferation assay. Bull Math Biol 79:1888–1906MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Browning AP, McCue SW, Binny RN, Plank MJ, Shah ET, Simpson MJ (2018) Inferring parameters for a lattice-free model of cell migration and proliferation using experimental data. J Theor Biol 437:251–260MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai AQ, Landman KA, Hughes BD (2007) Multi-scale modeling of a wound-healing cell migration assay. J Theor Biol 245:576–594MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey TE, Takahashi T, Resnick LA, Oettgen HF, Old LJ (1976) Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma: mixed hemadsorption assays for humoral immunity to cultured autologous melanoma cells. PNAS 73:3278–3282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collis J, Connor AJ, Paczkowski M, Kannan P, Pitt-Francis J, Byrne HM, Hubbard ME (2017) Bayesian calibration, validation and uncertainty quantification for predictive modelling of tumour growth: a tutorial. J R Soc Interface 15:20180318zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly AD, Gavaghan D, Cooper J, Tavener S (2018) Inference-based assessment of parameter identifiability in nonlinear biological models. Bull Math Biol 79:939–974Google Scholar
  10. Fasano A, Herrero MA, Rodrigo MR (2009) Slow and fast invasion waves in a model of acid-mediated tumour growth. Math Biosci 220:45–56MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Fearnhead P, Prangle D (2012) Constructing summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation: semi-automatic approximate Bayesian computation. J R Stat Soc B 74:419–474MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gatenby RA, Gawlinski ET (1996) A reaction–diffusion model of cancer invasion. Cancer Res 56:5745–5753Google Scholar
  13. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian data analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Haridas P, Penington CJ, McGovern JA, McElwain DLS, Simpson MJ (2017a) Quantifying rates of cell migration and cell proliferation in co-culture barrier assays reveals how skin and melanoma cells interact during melanoma spreading and invasion. J Theor Biol 423:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haridas P, McGovern JA, McElwain DLS, Simpson MJ (2017b) Quantitative comparison of the spreading and invasion of radial growth phase and metastatic melanoma cells in a three-dimensional human skin equivalent model. PeerJ 5:e3754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haridas P, Browning AP, McGovern JA, McElwain DLS, Simpson MJ (2018) Three-dimensional experiments and individual based simulations show that cell proliferation drives melanoma nest formation in human skin tissue. BMC Syst Biol 12:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Illowsky B, Dean S (2015) Introductory statistics. OpenStax College, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain HV, Richardson A, Meyer-Hermann M, Byrne HM (2014) Exploiting the synergy between Carboplatin and ABT737 in the treatment of ovarian carcinomas. PLoS ONE 9:e81582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston ST, Simpson MJ, McElwain DLS, Binder BJ, Ross JV (2014) Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation. Open Biol 4:140097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landman KA, Pettet GJ (1998) Modelling the action of proteinase and inhibitor in tissue invasion. Math Biosci 154:23–37CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Landman KA, Pettet GJ, Newgreen NF (2003) Chemotactic cellular migration: smooth and discontinuous travelling wave solutions. SIAM J Appl Math 63:1666–1681MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Landman KA, Simpson MJ, Slater JL, Newgreen DF (2005) Diffusive and chemotactic cellular migration: smooth and discontinuous traveling wave solutions. SIAM J Appl Math 65:1420–1442MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Landman KA, Simpson MJ, Pettet GJ (2008) Tactically-driven nonmonotone travelling waves. Physica D 237:678–691MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Maclaren OJ, Parker A, Pin C, Carding SR, Watson AJM, Fletcher AG, Byrne HM, Maini PK (2017) A hierarchical Bayesian model for understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of the intestinal epithelium. PLoS Comput Biol 13:1005688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maini PK, McElwain DLS, Leavesley DI (2004a) Traveling wave model to interpret a wound-healing cell migration assay for human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Tissue Eng 10:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maini PK, McElwain DLS, Leavesley D (2004b) Travelling waves in a wound healing assay. Appl Math Lett 17:575–580MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Marchant BP, Norbury J, Sherratt JA (2001) Travelling wave solutions to a haptotaxis-dominated model of malignant invasion. Nonlinearity 14:1653–1671MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchant BP, Norbury J (2002) Discontinuous travelling wave solutions for certain hyperbolic systems. IMA J Appl Math 67:201–224MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Marchant BP, Norbury J, Byrne HM (2006) Biphasic behaviour in malignant invasion. Math Med Biol 3:173–196CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Massey SC, Assanah MC, Lopez KA, Canoll P, Swanson KR (2012) Glial progenitor cell recruitment drives aggressive glioma growth: mathematical and experimental modelling. J R Soc Interface 9:1757–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mathworks (2018a) Image processing toolbox. https://au.mathworks.com/products/image.html. Accessed Aug 2018
  32. Mathworks (2018b) Gridded and scattered data interpolation, data gridding, piecewise polynomials. https://au.mathworks.com/help/matlab/interpolation.html. Accessed Aug 2018
  33. Mathworks (2018c) Kernel smoothing function estimate for univariate and bivariate data. http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/ksdensity.html. Accessed Aug 2018
  34. Perumpanani A, Sherratt JA, Norbury J, Byrne HM (1999) A two parameter family of travelling waves with a singular barrier arising from the modelling of extracellular matrix mediated cellular invasion. Physica D 126:145–159CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Perumpanani AJ, Marchant BP, Norbury J (2000) Travelling shock waves arising in a model of malignant invasion. SIAM J Appl Math 60:463–476MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarapata EA, de Pillis LG (2014) A comparison and catalog of intrinsic tumor growth models. Bull Math Biol 76:2010–2024MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Sengers BG, Please CP, Oreffo ROC (2007) Experimental characterization and computational modelling of two-dimensional cell spreading for skeletal regeneration. J R Soc Interface 4:1107–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sisson SA, Fan Y, Tanaka MM (2007) Sequential Monte Carlo without likelihoods. PNAS 104:1760–1765MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Simpson MJ, Landman KA (2007) Nonmonotone chemotactic invasion: high-resolution simulations, phase plane analysis and new benchmark problems. J Comput Phys 225:6–12MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Simpson MJ, McInerney S, Carr EJ, Cuttle L (2017) Quantifying the efficacy of first aid treatments for burn injuries using mathematical modelling and in vivo porcine experiments. Sci Rep 7:10925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smallbone K, Gavaghan DJ, Gatenby RA, Maini PK (2005) The role of acidity in solid tumour growth and invasion. J Theor Biol 235:476–484MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swanson KR, Rockne RC, Claridge J, Chaplain MA, Alvord EC, Anderson ARA (2011) Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology. Cancer Res 71:7366–7375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toni T, Welch D, Strelkowa N, Ipsen A, Stumpf MPH (2009) Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems. J R Soc Interface 6:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Treloar KK, Simpson MJ (2013) Sensitivity of edge detection methods for quantifying cell migration assays. PLoS ONE 8:e67389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Treloar KK, Simpson MJ, Haridas P, Manton KJ, Leavesley DI, McElwain DLS, Baker RE (2013) Multiple types of data are required to identify the mechanisms influencing the spatial expansion of melanoma cell colonies. BMC Syst Biol 7:137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tremel A, Tirtaatmadja N, Hughes BD, Stevens GW, Landman KA, OConnor AJ (2009) Cell migration and proliferation during monolayer formation and wound healing. Chem Eng Sci 64:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vittadello ST, McCue SW, Gunasingh G, Haass NK, Simpson MJ (2018) Mathematical models for cell migration wit real-time cell cycle dynamics. Biophys J 114:1241–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warne DJ, Baker RE, Simpson MJ (2017) Optimal quantification of contact inhibition in cell populations. Biophys J 113:1920–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warne DJ, Baker RE, Simpson MJ (2018) Multilevel rejection sampling for approximate Bayesian computation. Comput Stat Data Anal 124:71–86MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesQueensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute of Health and Biomedical InnovationQUTKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations