Advertisement

TechTrends

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Investigating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Group Cohesion, Attitude, and Academic Achievement in Collaborative Learning Environments

  • Cigdem Uz BilginEmail author
  • Abdulmenaf Gul
Original Paper
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Although collaborative-learning as an instructional method has shown promising results since the 1970’s, a number of significant problems within collaborative learning environments have been encountered. These problems relate to aspects of group dynamics including group cohesion, participation, communication, collaboration, and trust. Although the literature suggests various instructional techniques to increase group cohesion and learners’ attitudes towards group learning environments, new methods and techniques should be explored in order to address and eliminate these problems. Gamification, which is the use of game elements and techniques in non-gaming environments, can be leveraged as a new method in order to increase group cohesion and group performance within collaborative learning environments. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of gamification (both online and face-to-face) on the attitudes of students towards group learning environments, their course, group cohesion, and their academic achievement. The study aims to promote learners’ collaboration in groups utilizing gamification elements. In this quasi-experimental design study, gamified (44 students) and traditional (48 students) groups were compared. Although no significant difference was established between the gamified and traditional groups in terms of students’ attitudes towards group learning environments and the course, the gamified group outperformed the traditional group in terms of group cohesion scores and team member evaluation scores.

Keywords

Gamification Collaborative learning Group cohesion Attitude 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest on the development of this article.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.

References

  1. Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 217–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsancak, D. (2010). The Investigation of the Relationship between Transactive Memory with Group Cohesion, Group Atmosphere and Performance in Computer Supported Collaboration Learning Environments (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  3. Anbarli Kirkiz (2010). Öğrencilerin İngilizce Dersine ait Tutumlari ile Akademik Başarilari Arasindaki İlişki (Master Thesis). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
  4. Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers in Education, 83, 57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Engaging engineering students with Gamification: An empirical study. In 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES). IEEE eXpress Conference Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2017). Individualising gamification: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Computers in Education, 106, 43–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunchball. (2010). Gamification 101: An introduction to game dynamics [White paper]. Retrieved from http://jndglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/gamification1011.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2018.
  8. Çakıroğlu, Ü., Başıbüyük, B., Güler, M., Atabay, M., & Yılmaz Memiş, B. (2017). Gamifying an ICT course: Influences on engagement and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 98–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open courses. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177–203.Google Scholar
  10. Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2014). Academic course gamification: The art of perceived playfulness. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A. S., & De Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V. H. S., Reis, H. M., & Isotani, S. (2014). A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing - SAC ‘14 (Vol. 60, pp. 216–222). New York: ACM Press.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2554850.2554956.
  13. De-Marcos, L., Garcia-Lopez, E., & Garcia-Cabot, A. (2016). On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers in Education, 95, 99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘13 (pp. 763–772). New York: ACM Press.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470763.
  15. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., OʼHara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non- gaming contexts. In Proceedings. CHI EA ‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2425–2428). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  16. Dickey, M. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers in Education, 63, 380–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Boston: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitz-Walter, Z., Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Tjondronegoro, D., & Scott-Parker, B. (2017). Driven to drive? Investigating the effect of gamification on learner driver behavior, perceived motivation and user experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 586–595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flatla, D. R., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L. E., Bateman, S., & Mandryk, R. L. (2011). Calibration games: making calibration tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game elements. In Proceedings, 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST ‘11 (pp. 403–412). New York: ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047248.
  21. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenlee, B. J., & Karanxha, Z. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohort and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(11), 357–382.  https://doi.org/10.1177/194277511000501101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hakulinen, L., & Auvinen, T. (2014). The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. In Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, LATICE 2014 (pp. 9–16). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.10.
  24. Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Empirical study on the effect of achievement badges in TRAKLA2 online learning environment. In Proceedings of Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) Conference (pp. 47–54). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.34.
  25. Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 3025–3034).  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377.
  27. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers in Education, 80, 152–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoogveld, A., & Paas, F. (2002). Exploring teachers’ instructional design practices from a systems design perspective. Instructional Science, 30(43), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. Paper presented at the AAAI 19th National Conference On Artificial Intelligence (Workshop on Challenges in Game AI). San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2011). "Gamification" from the perspective of service marketing. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Gamification workshop) Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1036–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  33. Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Gamification in learning and education: Enjoy learning like gaming. Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47283-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knutas, A., Ikonen, J., Nikula, U., & Porras, J. (2014). Increasing collaborative communications in a programming course with gamification. In B. Rachev & A. Smrikarov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on computer systems and technologies - CompSysTech ‘14 (pp. 370–377). New York: ACM Press.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2659532.2659620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kouros C, Abrami PC (2006) How do students really feel about working in small groups? The role of student attitudes and behaviours in cooperative classroom settings. Paper presented 2006 The American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, April, 2006, San Fransisco, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922–929.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 616–657.  https://doi.org/10.1086/318965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leaning, M. (2015). A study of the use of games and gamification to enhance student engagement, experience and achievement on a theory-based course of an undergraduate media degree. Journal of Media Practice, 16(2), 155–170.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2015.1041807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146–151.Google Scholar
  40. Li, C., Dong, Z., Untch, R. H., & Chasteen, M. (2013). Engaging computer science students through gamification in an online social network based collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(1), 72–77.  https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2013.v3.237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384–393.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marti-Parreño, J., Méndez-Ibáñez, E., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663–676.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  44. Moccozet, L., Tardy, C., Opprecht, W., & Leonard, M. (2013). Gamification-based assessment of group work. In Proceedings of the 16 thInternational Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 171–179). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2013.6644565.
  45. Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In Proc. 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, Vol. 1, 323–329.Google Scholar
  46. Neeli, B. K. (2012). A method to engage employees using gamification in BPO Industry. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Services in Emerging Markets (pp. 142–146). IEEE.Google Scholar
  47. Nicholson, S. (2012). A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. In C. Martin (Ed.), Proceedings of the games+learning+society 8.0 (pp. 223–230). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  48. Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 1–20). Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prichard, J. S., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696–726.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2017). Fostering development of work competencies and motivation via gamification. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Competence-based vocational and professional education. Technical and vocational education and training: Issues, concerns and prospects (pp. 795–818). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2002). Organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Seaborn, K., & Deborah, I. F. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 74, 14–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shea, J. H. (1995). Problems with collaborative learning. Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), 306–308.  https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-43.4.306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353.Google Scholar
  57. Su, C.-H., & Cheng, C.-H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268–286.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ulrich, F., & Helms, N. H. (2017). Creating evaluation profiles for games designed to be fun: An interpretive framework for serious game mechanics. Simulation & Gaming, 48(5), 695–714.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117709841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yildirim, I. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students’ attitudes toward lessons. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 86–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yılmaz, T. K., Baydaş, Ö., & Kokoç, M. (2017). Grup çalışması ortamlarına karşı öğrenci tutumları ölçeğinin (GÇOÖT) Türkçeye uyarlanması. İlköğretim Online, 16(3). 1049–1057.  https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design - implementing game mechanics in web and Mobile apps. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education FacultyYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Education FacultyHakkari UniversityHakkariTurkey

Personalised recommendations