Advertisement

TechTrends

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Faculty Perceptions of the Usefulness of Integrating Graduate Student-Created Resources into Teacher Preparation Coursework

  • Jacqueline RileyEmail author
  • Laura Isbell
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how faculty in the department of Curriculum and Instruction at one university perceived the usefulness of a website which contained ELL (English language learner) teaching resources (e.g., videos, lesson plans, handouts) created by graduate students. The website was created as part of a graduate level course which positioned students as contributors to the growing body of resources available to educators at both the university and K-12 level. The faculty members reviewed the webpage and provided survey feedback indicating whether or not they felt that the resources should be shared with the pre-service and in-service teachers they taught, and if so, how the resources may be utilized. The survey responses indicated nearly all faculty members felt they would be somewhat likely or very likely to share the website with the educators they taught and offered a variety of ideas of how they may integrate the resources into their courses.

Keywords

Higher education Teacher preparation Online learning Technology 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Author Jacqueline Riley declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Laura Isbell declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ascough, R. S. (2002). Designing for online distance education: Putting pedagogy before technology. Teaching Theology and Religion, 5(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Downes, S. (2011). Open educational resources: A definition. Half an hour. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot/2011/07/open-educational-resources.definition.html. Accessed Sept 2018.
  3. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8–33). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks determine the content of math instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26, 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014–2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Herrell, A. L., & Jordan, M. (2015). 50 strategies for teaching english language learners (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, T. S., Smagorinsky, P., Thompson, L., & Fry, P. G. (2003). Learning to teach the five-paragraph theme. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 136–176.Google Scholar
  9. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, M. (2011). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266.Google Scholar
  10. Meyers, N. M., & Nulty, D. D. (2008). How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessment, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 565–577.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802226502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shabani, K. (2016). Applications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach for teachers’ professional development. Cogent Education, 3(1).  https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1252177.
  12. Sosniak, L. A., & Perlman, C. L. (1990). Secondary education by the book. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(5), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stodolsky, S. (1989). The subject matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Meter, P., & Stevens, R. J. (2000). The role of theory in the study of peer collaboration. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Woodward, A., & Elliott, D. L. (1990). Textbook use and teacher professionalism. In D. L. Elliott & W. Arthur (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States (pp. 178–193). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M University-CommerceCommerceUSA

Personalised recommendations