, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 15–22 | Cite as

GroupMe: Investigating Use of Mobile Instant Messaging in Higher Education Courses

  • Susie GronsethEmail author
  • Waneta Hebert
Original Paper


In this study, the use of the mobile instant messaging (MIM) tool GroupMe was explored in the higher education context. The tool was used to facilitate online course discussions, small group work, and other course communications in face-to-face and online sections of two graduate educational technology courses. Over 900 postings were generated from 29 participants, then coded and analyzed by the researchers. Qualitative data was also obtained through an e-mail follow-up questionnaire. Findings indicate that the MIM platform afforded students opportunities to engage in productive course-relevant conversations and provided additional ways for learners to exhibit online social presence through tool features. Recommendations for the use of MIM to support teaching and learning and suggestions for further scholarly inquiry are discussed.


Mobile instant messaging Online discussion Higher education Instructional technology 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the researchers’ Institutional Review Board, and all procedures involving human participants were in accordance with these ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was waived per the IRB approval as this was retrospective.


  1. Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter, J., & Green, T. (2017). Connecting and engaging with students through Groupme. TechTrends, 61, 1–4. Scholar
  4. Cheng, C. K., Paré, D. E., Collimore, L.-M., & Joordens, S. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance. Computers & Education, 56(1), 253–261. Scholar
  5. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49, 3–6.Google Scholar
  6. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7.Google Scholar
  7. Dalelio, C. (2013). Student participation in online discussion boards in a higher education setting. International Journal on E-Learning, 12(3), 249–271.Google Scholar
  8. Devers, C. J., Conrad, J., Devers, E. E., Cook, M. E., & Alayan, A. J. (2016). Video and written discussion. Proceedings of the EdMedia International Conference, 2016, 1039–1042.Google Scholar
  9. Goel, L., Zhang, P., & Templeton, M. (2012). Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1122–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goggins, S., & Xing, W. (2016). Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion. Computers & Education, 94, 241–251. Scholar
  11. Gronseth, S., & Zhang, H. (2018). Advancing social presence, community, and cognition through online discussions. In M. Marmon (Ed.), Enhancing social presence in online learning environments (pp. 117–140). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris-John, M. (2006). Creating meaningful online discussions. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 1(2).Google Scholar
  13. Lauricella, S., & Kay, R. (2013). Exploring the use of text and instant messaging in higher education classrooms. Research in Learning Technology, 21.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Nitza, D., & Roman, Y. (2016). WhatsApp messaging: Achievements and success in academia. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas, J. (2013). Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in health care education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 69, 199–215. Scholar
  20. Timmis, S. (2012). Constant companions: Instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Computers & Education, 59(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, L.-C. C., & Morgan, W. R. (2008). Student perceptions of using instant messaging software to facilitate synchronous online class interaction in a graduate teacher education course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 15–21.Google Scholar
  22. Winiecki, D. J. (2003). Instructional discussion in online education: Practical and research-oriented perspectives. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 193–215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations