Social Network Structures in African American Churches: Implications for Health Promotion Programs
- 198 Downloads
The prevalence of obesity among African Americans is higher than among other racial/ethnic groups. African American churches hold a central role in promoting health in the community; yet, church-based interventions have had limited impact on obesity. While recent studies have described the influence of social networks on health behaviors, obesity interventions informed by social network analysis have been limited. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 281 African American men and women from three churches in northeast urban cities in the USA. Data were collected on sociodemographic and clinical factors and anthropometrics. Using a social network survey applying a name generator, we computed network level metrics. Exponential random graph models (ERGM) were performed to examine whether each structural property found in the empirical (observed) networks occurred more frequently than expected by chance by comparing the empirical networks to the randomly simulated networks. Overall, church friendship networks were sparse (low density). We also found that while friendship ties were more reciprocated between dyads in church networks, and there were more tendencies for clustering of friendships (significant positive transitive closure) than in random networks, other characteristics such as expansiveness (number of actors with a great number of friends) did not differ from what would be expected by chance in random networks. These data suggest that interventions with African American churches should not assume a unitary network through which a single intervention should be used.
KeywordsSocial network analysis Social network structure African American Church-based intervention Community-based health intervention Obesity
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Nursing Research and National Research Foundation of Korea (K23NR014661 and NRF-2017R1D1A1B03033380).
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health data interactive. Atlanta, GA: Centers for disease control and prevention, national center for health statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hdi.htm. Updated 2014. Accessed May/1, 2017
- 8.Holt CL, Litaker MS, Scarinci IC, et al. Spiritually based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: screening and theory-based outcomes from a randomized trial. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(4):458–68. Accessed 15 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112459651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Vidrine DJ, Fletcher FE, Danysh HE, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of an interactive mobile messaging intervention for underserved smokers: project ACTION. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):696. Accessed 15 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Faridi Z, Shuval K, Njike VY, et al. Partners reducing effects of diabetes (PREDICT): a diabetes prevention physical activity and dietary intervention through African-American churches. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):306–15. Accessed 15 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyp005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Allicock M, Campbell MK, Valle CG, Carr C, Resnicow K, Gizlice Z. Evaluating the dissemination of body & soul, an evidence-based fruit and vegetable intake intervention: challenges for dissemination and implementation research. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44(6):530–8. Accessed 15 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.09.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Smith KP, Christakis NA, eds. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol. 2008;34:405–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601.
- 21.Berkman LF, Glass T, Eds. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford; 2000. Berkman L. F. and Kawachi I., eds. Social integration, Social Networks and Social Support and HealthGoogle Scholar
- 23.de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks. Soc Networks 2010;32(3):161–167. Accessed 15 April 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.09.001.
- 27.Taylor RJ, Mouzon DM, Nguyen AW, Chatters LM. Reciprocal family, friendship and church support networks of African Americans: findings from the national survey of American life. Race Soc Probl. 2016;8(4):326–39. Accessed 15 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-016-9186-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G, editors. Exponential random graph models for social networks: theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University; 2012.Google Scholar
- 31.Valente TW. Social networks and health: models, methods, and applications. In: Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications ; 2010:1–296. Accessed 30 November 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001.
- 33.Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002.Google Scholar
- 34.Wang P, Robins GL, Pattison PE. PNet: A program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. 2006.Google Scholar
- 37.Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing social networks. London: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
- 39.Marks J, Sanigorski A, Owen B, McGlashan J, Millar L, Nichols M, et al. Networks for prevention in 19 communities at the start of a large-scale community-based obesity prevention initiative. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(4):575–84. Accessed 12 November 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Snijders T Transitivity and triads. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/Trans_Triads_ha.pdf; accessed 9/12/2013. Updated 20122018.
- 44.Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. Systems science methods in public health: Dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:357–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 45.Sabot K, Wickremasinghe D, Blanchet K, Avan B, Schellenberg J. Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: A systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):208–017 –0597-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0597-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar