Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 96, Issue 2, pp 300–310 | Cite as

Social Network Structures in African American Churches: Implications for Health Promotion Programs

  • Soohyun NamEmail author
  • Sunyoung Jung
  • Robin Whittemore
  • Carl Latkin
  • Trace Kershaw
  • Nancy S. Redeker
  • Sangchoon Jeon
  • David Vlahov


The prevalence of obesity among African Americans is higher than among other racial/ethnic groups. African American churches hold a central role in promoting health in the community; yet, church-based interventions have had limited impact on obesity. While recent studies have described the influence of social networks on health behaviors, obesity interventions informed by social network analysis have been limited. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 281 African American men and women from three churches in northeast urban cities in the USA. Data were collected on sociodemographic and clinical factors and anthropometrics. Using a social network survey applying a name generator, we computed network level metrics. Exponential random graph models (ERGM) were performed to examine whether each structural property found in the empirical (observed) networks occurred more frequently than expected by chance by comparing the empirical networks to the randomly simulated networks. Overall, church friendship networks were sparse (low density). We also found that while friendship ties were more reciprocated between dyads in church networks, and there were more tendencies for clustering of friendships (significant positive transitive closure) than in random networks, other characteristics such as expansiveness (number of actors with a great number of friends) did not differ from what would be expected by chance in random networks. These data suggest that interventions with African American churches should not assume a unitary network through which a single intervention should be used.


Social network analysis Social network structure African American Church-based intervention Community-based health intervention Obesity 



This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Nursing Research and National Research Foundation of Korea (K23NR014661 and NRF-2017R1D1A1B03033380).


  1. 1.
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):491–7. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? Estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(10):2323–30. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health data interactive. Atlanta, GA: Centers for disease control and prevention, national center for health statistics. Updated 2014. Accessed May/1, 2017
  4. 4.
    Tussing-Humphreys LM, Fitzgibbon ML, Kong A, Odoms-Young A. Weight loss maintenance in African American women: A systematic review of the behavioral lifestyle intervention literature. J Obes. 2013;2013:437369. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young DR, Stewart KJ. A church-based physical activity intervention for African American women. Fam Commun Health. 2006;29(2):103–17. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  6. 6.
    West DS, Elaine Prewitt T, Bursac Z, Felix HC. Weight loss of Black, White, and Hispanic men and women in the diabetes prevention program. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(6):1413–20. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lancaster KJ, Carter-Edwards L, Grilo S, Shen C, Schoenthaler AM. Obesity interventions in African American faith-based organizations: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014;15:159–76. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holt CL, Litaker MS, Scarinci IC, et al. Spiritually based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: screening and theory-based outcomes from a randomized trial. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(4):458–68. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matthews AK, Berrios N, Darnell JS, Calhoun E. A qualitative evaluation of a faith-based breast and cervical cancer screening intervention for African American women. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(5):643–63. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilcox S, Parrott A, Baruth M, et al. The faith, activity, and nutrition program: A randomized controlled trial in African-American churches. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(2):122–31. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vidrine DJ, Fletcher FE, Danysh HE, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of an interactive mobile messaging intervention for underserved smokers: project ACTION. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):696. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291(23):2847–50. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williamson DF, Kahn HS, Remington PL, Anda RF. The 10-year incidence of overweight and major weight gain in US adults. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(3):665–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA. 2003;289(1):76–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewis CE, Smith DE, Wallace DD, Williams OD, Bild DE, Jacobs DRJ. Seven-year trends in body weight and associations with lifestyle and behavioral characteristics in black and white young adults: the CARDIA study. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(4):635–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faridi Z, Shuval K, Njike VY, et al. Partners reducing effects of diabetes (PREDICT): a diabetes prevention physical activity and dietary intervention through African-American churches. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):306–15. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allicock M, Campbell MK, Valle CG, Carr C, Resnicow K, Gizlice Z. Evaluating the dissemination of body & soul, an evidence-based fruit and vegetable intake intervention: challenges for dissemination and implementation research. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44(6):530–8. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gesell SB, Bess KD, Barkin SL. Understanding the social networks that form within the context of an obesity prevention intervention. J Obes. 2012. Accessed 15 April 2018;2012:1–10. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hunter RF, McAneney H, Davis M, Tully MA, Valente TW, Kee F. "hidden" social networks in behavior change interventions. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):513–6. Accessed 6 October 2016. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith KP, Christakis NA, eds. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol. 2008;34:405–29.
  21. 21.
    Berkman LF, Glass T, Eds. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford; 2000. Berkman L. F. and Kawachi I., eds. Social integration, Social Networks and Social Support and HealthGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valente TW, Palinkas LA, Czaja S, Chu K, Hendricks Brown C. Social network analysis for program implementation. PLoS One. 2015;10(6). Accessed 12 November 2018):e0131712. Scholar
  23. 23.
    de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks. Soc Networks 2010;32(3):161–167. Accessed 15 April 2018. doi:
  24. 24.
    Nam S, Redeker N, Whittemore R. Social networks and future direction for obesity research: a scoping review. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63(3):299–317. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–9. Accessed 30 August 2018. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang S, de la Haye K, Ji M, An R. Applications of social network analysis to obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(7):976–88. Accessed 12 November 2018. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor RJ, Mouzon DM, Nguyen AW, Chatters LM. Reciprocal family, friendship and church support networks of African Americans: findings from the national survey of American life. Race Soc Probl. 2016;8(4):326–39. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robins G, Pattison P, Kalish Y, Lusher D. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc Networks. 2007;29(2):173–91. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Snijders TAB, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol Methodol. 2006;36(1):99–153. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G, editors. Exponential random graph models for social networks: theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University; 2012.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Valente TW. Social networks and health: models, methods, and applications. In: Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications ; 2010:1–296. Accessed 30 November 2015.
  32. 32.
    Chen MM, Lear SA, Gao M, Frohlich JJ, Birmingham CL. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of waist circumference and the waist-to-hip ratio. Obes Res. 2001;9(10):651. Accessed 15 April 2018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang P, Robins GL, Pattison PE. PNet: A program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. 2006.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks. Soc Networks. 2010;32(3):161–7. Accessed 9 October 2013. Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robins G, Pattison P, Wang P. Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Soc Networks. 2009;31(2):105–17. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  37. 37.
    Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing social networks. London: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gesell SB, Barkin SL, Valente TW. Social network diagnostics: a tool for monitoring group interventions. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):116. Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marks J, Sanigorski A, Owen B, McGlashan J, Millar L, Nichols M, et al. Networks for prevention in 19 communities at the start of a large-scale community-based obesity prevention initiative. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(4):575–84. Accessed 12 November 2018. Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sueur C, Deneubourg J, Petit O. From social network (centralized vs. decentralized) to collective decision-making (unshared vs. shared consensus). PLoS One. 2012;7(2). Accessed 15 April 2018):e32566. Scholar
  41. 41.
    Snijders T Transitivity and triads.; accessed 9/12/2013. Updated 20122018.
  42. 42.
    Fyrand L. Reciprocity: A predictor of mental health and continuity in elderly people's relationships? A review. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2010;2010:14. Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang J, Shoham DA, Tesdahl E, Gesell SB. Network interventions on physical activity in an afterschool program: An agent-based social network study. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:S236–43. Accessed 15 April 2018. Scholar
  44. 44.
    Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. Systems science methods in public health: Dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:357–76. Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sabot K, Wickremasinghe D, Blanchet K, Avan B, Schellenberg J. Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: A systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):208–017 –0597-1. Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale University, School of NursingOrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations