Advertisement

The Evolution Dynamic and Long-Run Equilibrium in a Stock Market with Heterogeneous Traders

  • Pengju ZhaoEmail author
  • Wei Zhang
  • Yumin Liu
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

This paper uses ideas from biological evolution to analyze the evolution of the securities market in which rational and irrational traders coexist. A market evolutionary model is developed to describe the dynamic trajectories of rational and irrational traders’ wealth. The main question is, are irrational traders eliminated as the securities market evolves. The paper considers the impact of new entrants on the security market long-term equilibrium. In addition, it discusses the existence and uniqueness of the long-term equilibrium The paper finds that, under some market conditions, irrational traders could survive in the long run.

Keywords

Behavioral Finance irrational traders financial evolution theory random dynamic system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge editors of Journal of Systems Scienence and Systems Engineering, and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71790594 and Programfor interdisciplinary direction team in Zhongyuan University of Technology, China.

References

  1. Akbas F, Armstrong W J, Sorescu S, Subrahmanyam A (2015). Smart money, dumb money, and capital market anomalies. Journal of Finance Economics. 118(2): 355–382.Google Scholar
  2. Alchian A A (1951). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. The Journal of Political Economics. 58(3): 211–221.Google Scholar
  3. Biais B, Shadur R (2000). Darwinian selection does not eliminate irrational traders. European Economic Review 44(3): 469–490.Google Scholar
  4. Blume L, Easley D (1992). Evolution and market behavior. Journal of Economic Theory 58: 9–40.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Blume L, Easley D (2006). If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Belief selection in complete and incomplete markets. Econometrica 74(4): 929–966.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottazzi G, Dindo P (2014). Evolution and market behavior with endogenous investment rules. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 48(11): 121–146.Google Scholar
  7. Bottazzi G, Giachini D (2017). Wealth and price distribution by diffusive approximation in a repeated prediction market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 471: 473–479.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bottazzi G, Dindo P, Giachini D (2017). Long-run heterogeneity in an exchange economy with fixed-mix traders. Economic Theory 66(2): 407–447.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiarella C, Dieci R, Gardini L(2006). Asset price and wealth dynamics in a financial market with heterogeneous agents. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30(9-10): 1755–1786.Google Scholar
  10. Evstigneev IV, Hens T, Schenk-Hoppe KR (2006). Evolutionary stable stock markets. Journal of Economic Theory 27(6): 449–468.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama EF (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of Business 38(1): 34–105.Google Scholar
  12. Fama EF (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empiricalwork. Journal of Finance 25(3): 383–417.Google Scholar
  13. Fama EF (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance 36(11): 1575–1617.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman M (1953). The case for flexible exchange rates. Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Grinblatt M, Titman S (1993). Performance measurement without benchmarks: An examination of mutual fund returns. The Journal of Business66.DOI:10.1086/296593Google Scholar
  16. Guo J, He XD (2017). Equilibrium asset pricing with Epstein-Zin and loss-averse investors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 76: 86–108.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyamb A, Titman S (2005). Feedback and the success of irrational investors. Journal of Financial Economics 32(5): 1–28.Google Scholar
  18. Higham DJ (2000). Mean-square and asymptotic stability of the stochastic theta method. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis 38(3): 753–769.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Ikeda N, Watanabe S (1977). A comparison theorem for solutions of stochastic differential equations and its applications. Osaka Journal of Math 14(3): 619–633.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1039–1061.Google Scholar
  21. Lin L, Sornette D (2013). Diagnostics of rational expectation financial bubbles with stochastic mean-reverting termination times. European Journal of Finance 19(5): 344–365.Google Scholar
  22. Lo AW (1999). The three P’s of total risk management. Financial Analysts Journal 55(1): 13–26.Google Scholar
  23. Lo AW (2004). The adaptive market hypothesis: markets efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Portfolio Management 31(1): 21–44.Google Scholar
  24. Oksendal B (2003). Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandroni A (2005). Market selection when markets are incomplete. Journal of Mathematical Economics 41: 91–104.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Seather BE, Engen SLR (2000). Estimating the time to extinction in an island population of song sparrows. Proceedings of Theory Society of London. Series B 267: 621–626.Google Scholar
  27. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–292.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Yan H (2008). Natural selection in financial markets: Does it work? Management Science 54: 1935–1950.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang Z, Qin G (2006). Continuous time evolutionary financial model and globally asymptotically evolutionary stable strategies. Economic Research Journal 5: 41–49.Google Scholar
  30. Zhang YJ, Zhang W, Xiong X (2010). Strategies and investment returns: Agent based computational finance perspective. Journal of Management Science in China 13(9): 109–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Management and EconomicsTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.System and Industrial Engineering Research Center of Zhongyuan University of TechnologyZhengzhouChina
  3. 3.Business SchoolZhengzhou universityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations