Advertisement

On Optimal Priority Modelling of Group Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations with Normal Uncertainty Distribution

  • Lihong Wang
  • Zaiwu GongEmail author
Article

Abstract

The uncertainty distribution can more effectively express the uncertainty of decision makers’ judgments during a pairwise comparison of any alternatives. This paper investigates the priority models of group intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with normal uncertainty distribution. The mathematical equivalence between the membership, non-membership degree interval fuzzy preference relation and the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation is constructed, showing that there exists an inverse relationship between the priority of alternatives using these two types of interval preference relations. The new optimal models regarded the event that the deviation between the ideal judgement meeting the multiplicative consistency and the actual judgement obeying normal uncertainty distribution shall not exceed a threshold value under the given belief degree as a constraint, and regarded the minimum sum of all the threshold values as the objective function. The chance constraint was introduced to measure the degree to which multiplicative consistency can be realized under different belief degrees. The priority model provides a new method for simulating uncertainty and fuzziness in the real-world decision making environment.

Keywords

Group decisions and negotiations intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation multiplicative consistency normal uncertainty distribution chance constraint programming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71571104 and 71171115, a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and theNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China under Grant No. BK20141481, and the fifth issue of the “333 Project” funded research project under Grant No. BRA2017456.

References

  1. Atanassov KT (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems 20(1):87–96.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bustince H, Burillo P (1996). Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems 79(3):403–405.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1959). Chance-Constrained Programming. Management Science 6(6):73–79.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009). Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17(1):14–23.Google Scholar
  5. Dimitrov D (2004). The Paretian liberal with intuitionistic fuzzy preferences: A result. Social Choice & Welfare 23(1):149–156.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E (2017). Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 45(4):780–792.Google Scholar
  7. George C, Roger LB (2002). Statistical Inference: Common Families of Distributions. The Wadsworth Group.Google Scholar
  8. Gong ZW, Li LS, Zhou FX, Yao TX (2009). Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering 57(4):1187–1193.Google Scholar
  9. Gong Z, Tan X, Yang Y (2018a). Optimal weighting models based on linear uncertain constraints in intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society: 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Gong Z, Zhang N, Chiclana F (2018b). The optimization ordering model for intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with utility functions. Knowledge-Based Systems 162:174–184.Google Scholar
  11. Gorzalczany B (1983). Approximate inference with interval - valued fuzzy sets — an outline. Proceedings of the Polish Symposium on Interval and Fuzzy Mathematics: 89–95.Google Scholar
  12. Hwang CL, Lin MJ (1987). Group decision making under multiple criteria: Methods and applications. Bioworld Today: 281.Google Scholar
  13. Li CC, Dong Y, Xu Y, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2019). An overview on managing additive consistency of reciprocal preference relations for consistency driven decision making and fusion: Taxonomy and future directions. Information Fusion 52:143–156.Google Scholar
  14. Liu B (2014). Uncertainty Theory. Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Meng F, Chen X (2016). A robust additive consistency-based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization & Decision Making 17(1):1–25.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Meng F, Tan C, Chen X (2016). Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study. Omega 68:17–38.Google Scholar
  17. Orlovsky S (1978). Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(3):155–167.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Saaty TL (1978). Modeling unstructured decision problems-the theory of analytical hierarchies. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 20(3):147–158.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1987). Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 32(1):107–117.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Saaty TL (1994). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 24(6):19–43.Google Scholar
  21. Tanino T (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets & Systems 12(2):117–131.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Tanino T (1988). Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making: 54–71.Google Scholar
  23. Wan S, Feng W, Dong J (2017). A three-phase method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (99):1–1.Google Scholar
  24. Wang L, Gong Z (2017). Priority of a hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation with a normal distributionin meteorological disaster risk assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14(10):1203.Google Scholar
  25. Wang LH, Gong ZW, Zhang N (2018). Consensus modelling on interval-valued fuzzy preference relations with normal distribution. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 11(1):706–715.Google Scholar
  26. Xu ZS (2004). Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
  27. Xu Z (2007). Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences An International Journal 177(11):2363–2379.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu Z, Chen J (2008). Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 184(1):266–280.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu YJ, Gupta JND, Wang HM (2014a). The ordinal consistency of an incomplete reciprocal preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 246(4):62–77.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2014b). Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications. Computers & Industrial Engineering 67:93–103.Google Scholar
  31. Xu Y, Wang QQ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a). Methods to improve the ordinal and multiplicative consistency for reciprocal preference relations. Applied Soft Computing 67:479–493.Google Scholar
  32. Xu Y, Herrera F (2018). Visualizing and rectifying different inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: 362.Google Scholar
  33. Xu Y, Ma F, Herrera F (2018b). Revisiting inconsistent judgments for incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations: Algorithms to identify and rectify ordinal inconsistencies. Knowledge-Based Systems 163:305–319.Google Scholar
  34. Zadeh LA (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information & Control 8(3):338–353.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Management Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations