Advertisement

Breast cancer diagnosis with a microwave thermoacoustic imaging technique—a numerical approach

  • M. SoltaniEmail author
  • Reza Rahpeima
  • Farshad Moradi Kashkooli
Original Article
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

Microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging (MITAI) is an imaging technique with great potential for detecting breast cancer at early stages. Thermoacoustic imaging (TAI) combines the advantages of both microwave and ultrasound imaging techniques. In the current study, a three-dimensional novel numerical simulation of TAI phenomenon as a multi-physics problem is investigated. In the computational domain, a biological breast tissue including three different tissue types along with a tumor is placed in a tank containing castor oil and is irradiated by a 2.45-GHz pulsed microwave source from a rectangular waveguide. The generated heat in the biological tissue due to the electromagnetic wave irradiation and its corresponding pressure gradient in the tissue because of the temperature variations are evaluated. Also, capability of the MITAI process with respect to the tumor location and size is investigated. To identify the required power level needed for producing thermoacoustic signals, different power levels of microwave sources are investigated. The study’s results demonstrate a minuscule increase in temperature as a result of the absorption of pulsed microwave energy (for example, a maximum of 0.002472 °C temperature increase in tumor with 1 cm diameter which is located in fatty tissue of breast are obtained due to an excitation pulse of 1000 W, 1 ms). This small temperature variation in the tumor produces several kilopascals of pressure variations with maximum of 0.584016 kPa in tumor. This pressure variation will produce acoustic signals, which can be detected with an array of transducers and be used for image construction. Results demonstrate that the location of tumor in breast plays a vital role on the detecting performance of MITAI. Also, it is shown that very small tumors (with the diameter of 0.5 cm) can also be detected using MITAI technique. These simulations and procedures can be used for determining the amount of produced pressure variation, the acoustic pressure magnitude, and other complicated geometries.

Graphical abstract

A schematic of the thermoacoustic phenomenon

Keywords

Thermoacoustic imaging (TAI) Thermoacoustic tomography Breast tumor Early detection Microwave 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, Quinn-Reid D (1990) Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:553–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(90)90020-D CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmadian MT, Nikooyan AA (2006) Modeling and prediction of soft tissue directional stiffness using in-vitro force displacement data. Int J Sci Res 16:385–389Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baran A, LoVetri J, Kurrant D, Fear E (2017 XXXIInd, 2017. IEEE) Immersion medium independent microwave breast imaging. In: General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bazmara H, Soltani M, Sefidgar M, Bazargan M, Naeenian MM, Rahmim A (2016) Blood flow and endothelial cell phenotype regulation during sprouting angiogenesis. Med Biol Eng Comput 54:547–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bindu G, Lonappan A, Thomas V, Aanandan CK, Mathew KT (2006) Active microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. Prog Electromagn Res 58:149–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chanmugam AS, Hatwar R, Herman C (2012) Thermal analysis of cancerous breast model. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE) 2:135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2012-88244
  7. 7.
    Chen EJ, Novakofski J, Jenkins WK, O’Brien WD (1996) Young’s modulus measurements of soft tissues with application to elasticity imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 43:191–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cui Y, Yuan C, Ji Z (2017) A review of microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging: excitation source, data acquisition system and biomedical applications. J Innov Opt Health Sci 10:1730007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ding W, Ji Z, Xing D (2017) Microwave-excited ultrasound and thermoacoustic dual imaging. Appl Phys Lett 110:183701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gefen A, Dilmoney B (2007) Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. Technol Health Care 15:259–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    George T, Rufus E, Alex ZC (2015) Simulation of microwave induced thermoacoustical imaging technique for cancer detection. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 10(20): 9424–9428Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gong W, Chen G, Zhao Z, Nie Z (2009) Estimation of threshold noise suppression algorithm in microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Singapore, 2009, pp. 653–656.  https://doi.org/10.1109/APMC.2009.53
  15. 15.
    Guo B, Li J, Zmuda H, Sheplak M (2007) Multifrequency microwave-induced thermal acoustic imaging for breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:2000–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.895108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holmes KR Thermal conductivity data for specific tissues and organs for humans and other mammalian species. Thermal Properties. http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~valvano/research/Thermal.pdf
  17. 17.
    Jin X, Wang LV (2006) Thermoacoustic tomography with correction for acoustic speed variations. Phys Med Biol 51:6437–6448.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jing Z, Niklason L, Stein J, Shaw I, Defreitas K, Farbizio T, Ruth C, Ren B, Smith A (2007) X-ray mammography/tomosynthesis of patient’s breast. Patent US7881428B2, issued February 1, 2011. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7881428B2/en
  19. 19.
    Johansson I, Ringnér M, Hedenfalk I (2013) The landscape of candidate driver genes differs between male and female breast cancer. PLoS One 8:e78299.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078299 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kam EWS, So RMC, Fu SC (2016) One-step simulation of thermoacoustic waves in two-dimensional enclosures. Comput Fluids 140:270–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kruger RA, Miller KD, Reynolds HE, Kiser WL Jr, Reinecke DR, Kruger GA (2000) Breast cancer in vivo: contrast enhancement with thermoacoustic CT at 434 MHz—feasibility study. Radiology 216:279–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lazebnik M, Popovic D, McCartney L, Watkins CB, Lindstrom MJ, Harter J, Sewall S, Ogilvie T, Magliocco A, Breslin TM (2007) A large-scale study of the ultrawide band microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Phys Med Biol 52:6093–6115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li B, Zhao X, Dai SC, Cheng W (2014) Associations between mammography and ultrasound imaging features and molecular characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev : APJCP 15:3555–3559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McKnight AL, Kugel JL, Rossman PJ, Manduca A, Hartmann LC, Ehman RL (2002) MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 178:1411–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meaney PM, Fanning MW, Raynolds T, Fox CJ, Fang Q, Kogel CA, Poplack SP, Paulsen KD (2007) Initial clinical experience with microwave breast imaging in women with normal mammography. Acad Radiol 14:207–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.10.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nie L, Xing D, Zhou Q, Yang D, Guo H (2008) Microwave-induced thermoacoustic scanning CT for high-contrast and noninvasive breast cancer imaging. Med Phys 35:4026–4032.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2966345 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ottini L (2014) Male breast cancer: a rare disease that might uncover underlying pathways of breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 14:643–644.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3806 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pitchai K (2011) Electromagnetic and heat transfer modeling of microwave heating in domestic ovens. digitalcommons.unl.edu
  29. 29.
    Pramanik M, Ku G, Li C, Wang LV (2008) Design and evaluation of a novel breast cancer detection system combining both thermoacoustic (TA) and photoacoustic (PA) tomography. Med Phys 35:2218–2223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rudlowski C (2008) Male breast cancer. Breast Care 3:183–189.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000136825 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saied M, Mansour S, El Sabee M, Saad A, Abdel-Nour K (2012) Some electrical and physical properties of castor oil adducts dissolved in 1-propanol. J Mol Liq 172:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sefidgar M, Soltani M, Raahemifar K, Bazmara H, Nayinian SMM, Bazargan M (2014) Effect of tumor shape, size, and tissue transport properties on drug delivery to solid tumors. J Biol Eng 8:12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sill J, Fear E (2005) Tissue sensing adaptive radar for breast cancer detection: study of immersion liquids. Electron Lett 41:113–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sill JM, Fear EC (2005) Tissue sensing adaptive radar for breast cancer detection—experimental investigation of simple tumor models. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 53:3312–3319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soltani M (2012). Numerical modeling of drug delivery to solid tumor microvasculature, PhD thesis. Chem Eng (Nanotechnology), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/7278
  36. 36.
    Soltani M, Chen P (2011) Numerical modeling of fluid flow in solid tumors. PLoS One 6:e20344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soltani M, Chen P (2012) Effect of tumor shape and size on drug delivery to solid tumors. J Biol Eng 6:4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Song J, Zhao Z, Wang J, Zhu X, Wu J, Nie ZP, Liu QH (2013) An integrated simulation approach and experimental research on microwave induced thermo-acoustic tomography system. Prog Electromagn Res 140:385–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stylianopoulos T, Martin JD, Snuderl M, Mpekris F, Jain SR, Jain RK (2013) Coevolution of solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure in tumors during progression: implications for vascular collapse. Cancer Res 73:3833–3841.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Van Houten EE, Doyley MM, Kennedy FE, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD (2003) Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:72–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang X, Bauer DR, Witte R, Xin H (2012) Microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging model for potential breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:2782–2791.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2210218 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xie Y, Guo B, Li J, Ku G, Wang LV (2008) Adaptive and robust methods of reconstruction (ARMOR) for thermoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:2741–2752.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2008.919112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xu M, Wang LV (2002) Time-domain reconstruction for thermoacoustic tomography in a spherical geometry. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:814–822.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.801176 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xu X, Huang L, Ling Y, Jiang H (2017) Thermoacoustic imaging of finger joints and bones: a feasibility study. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Biotechnology & Medical Science. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 243–248Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zastrow E Zastrow E, Davis SK, Lazebnik M, Kelcz F, Van Veen BD, Hagness SC (2007) Database of 3D gridbased numerical breast phantoms for use in computational electromagnetics simulations. Instruction manual. uwcem.ece.wisc.edu
  46. 46.
    Zhu KG, Popovic M (2009) Spectral difference between microwave radar and microwave-induced thermoacoustic signals. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 8:1259–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhu Q, You S, Jiang Y, Zhang J, Xiao M, Dai Q, Sun Q (2011) Detecting angiogenesis in breast tumors: comparison of color Doppler flow imaging with ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:862–869.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zurrida S, Nolè F, Bonanni B, Mastropasqua MG, Arnone P, Gentilini O, Latronico A (2010) Male breast cancer. Future Oncol 6:985–991.  https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.10.55 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Soltani
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Reza Rahpeima
    • 6
  • Farshad Moradi Kashkooli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringK. N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Advanced Bioengineering Initiative Center, Computational Medicine CenterK. N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Cancer Biology Research Center, Cancer Institute of IranTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  5. 5.Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CBB)University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  6. 6.Department of Aerospace EngineeringK. N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations