Advertisement

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

, Volume 57, Issue 6, pp 1285–1295 | Cite as

Multimodal neuroimaging study reveals dissociable processes between structural and functional networks in patients with subacute intracerebral hemorrhage

  • Xiaobing Zhang
  • Xuebin Yu
  • Qingquan Bao
  • Liming Yang
  • Yu SunEmail author
  • Peng QiEmail author
Original Article
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

Emerging evidence has revealed widespread stroke-induced brain dysconnectivity, which leads to abnormal network organization. However, there are apparent discrepancies in dysconnectivity between structural connectivity and functional connectivity studies. In this work, resting-state fMRI and structural diffusion tensor imaging were obtained from 26 patients with subacute (10–14 days) intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and 20 matched healthy participants (patients/controls = 21/18 after head motion rejection). Graph theoretical approaches were applied to multimodal brain networks to quantitatively compare topological properties between both groups. Prominent small-world properties were found in the structural and functional brain networks of both groups. However, a significant deficit in global integration was revealed in the structural brain networks of the patient group and was associated with more severe clinical manifestations of ICH. Regarding ICH-related nodal deficits, reduced nodal interconnectivity was mainly detected in motor-related regions. Moreover, in the functional brain network, topological properties were mostly comparable between patients with ICH and healthy participants. Beyond the prominent small-world architecture in multimodal brain networks, there are dissociable alterations between structural and functional brain networks in patients with ICH. These findings highlight the potential for using aberrant network metrics as neural biomarkers for evaluation of the severity of ICH.

Graphical abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) also known as cerebral bleed, a major type of stroke, would significantly affect brain structure and function. Using multimodal neuroimaging, Zhang et al. investigate the ICH-related dysconnectivity in structural and functional brain networks and show a significantly disintegrated structural brain network with a preserved functional network topology in subacute phase (10–14 days).

Keywords

Subacute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) Resting-state fMRI Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) Brain connectivity Graph theoretical analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to convey our appreciation to all the participants, especially patients with ICH and their families.

Funding information

This work was supported by the General Research Plan B of Zhejiang province (Grant no. 2017KY661 awarded to X. Z.), the ‘Hundred Talents Program’ of Zhejiang University (awarded to Y. S.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81801785 awarded to Y. S.), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 2018QNA5017 awarded to Y. S.).

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the local ethics committee in Shaoxing People’s Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant (control group) or from the patient’s first degree relatives (patient group).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sporns O (2011) The human connectome: a complex network. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1224:109–125Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun Y, Lim J, Dai Z, Wong K, Taya F, Chen Y, Li J, Thakor N, Bezerianos A (2017) The effects of a mid-task break on the brain connectome in healthy participants: a resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroimage 152:19–30Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(3):186–198Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stam CJ (2014) Modern network science of neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 15(10):683–695Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grefkes C, Fink GR (2011) Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain 134(Pt 5):1264–1276Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feeney DM, Baron JC (1986) Diaschisis. Stroke 17(5):817–830Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alstott J, Breakspear M, Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Sporns O (2009) Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 5(6):e1000408Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dijkhuizen RM, van der Marel K, Otte WM, Hoff EI, van der Zijden JP, van der Toorn A, van Meer MP (2012) Functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging of brain reorganization after experimental stroke. Transl Stroke Res 3:36–43Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, Qin W, He Y, Fan F, Zhang Y, Wang M, Li K, Zang Y, Woodward TS, Zhu C (2010) Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 133(Pt 4):1224–1238Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng L, Wu Z, Sun J, Fu Y, Wang X, Yang GY, Miao F, Tong S (2015) Reorganization of motor execution networks during sub-acute phase after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(4):713–723Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Barsan WG, Sauerbeck LR, Zuccarello M, Khoury J (1996) The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 27(8):1304–1305Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE (2002) The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16(3):232–240Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42(8):703–709Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun Y, Dai Z, Li J, Collinson SL, Sim K (2017) Modular-level alterations of structure-function coupling in schizophrenia connectome. Hum Brain Mapp 38(4):2008–2025Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun Y, Yin Q, Fang R, Yan X, Wang Y, Bezerianos A, Tang H, Miao F, Sun J (2014) Disrupted functional brain connectivity and its association to structural connectivity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 9(5):e96505Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun Y, Li J, Suckling J, Feng L (2017) Asymmetry of hemispheric network topology reveals dissociable processes between functional and structural brain connectome in community-living elders. Front Aging Neurosci 9:361Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yan CG, Zang YF (2010) DPARSF: a Matlab toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci 4:13Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RS, Turner R (1996) Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med 35(3):346–355Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yan CG, Cheung B, Kelly C, Colcombe S, Craddock RC, Di Martino A, Li Q, Zuo XN, Castellanos FX, Milham MP (2013) A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics. NeuroImage 76:183–201Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15(1):273–289Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore E (2012) On the use of correlation as a measure of network connectivity. NeuroImage 60(4):2096–2106Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui Z, Zhong S, Xu P, He Y, Gong G (2013) PANDA: a pipeline toolbox for analyzing brain diffusion images. Front Hum Neurosci 7:42Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC (1999) Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 45(2):265–269Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun Y, Chen Y, Collinson SL, Bezerianos A, Sim K (2017) Reduced hemispheric asymmetry of brain anatomical networks is linked to schizophrenia: a connectome study. Cereb Cortex 27(1):602–615Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchanan CR, Pernet CR, Gorgolewski KJ, Storkey AJ, Bastin ME (2014) Test-retest reliability of structural brain networks from diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 86:231–243Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52(3):1059–1069Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Humphries MD, Gurney K, Prescott TJ (2006) The brainstem reticular formation is a small-world, not scale-freenetwork. Proc Biol Sci 273(1585):503–511Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maslov S, Sneppen K (2002) Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296(5569):910–913Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Achard S, Bullmore E (2007) Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol 3(2):e17Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Latora V, Marchiori M (2001) Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys Rev Lett 87(19):198701Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    van den Heuvel MP, de Lange SC, Zalesky A, Seguin C, Yeo BTT, Schmidt R (2017) Proportional thresholding in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity networks and consequences for patient-control connectome studies: issues and recommendations. NeuroImage 152:437–449Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    He Y, Wang J, Wang L, Chen ZJ, Yan C, Yang H, Tang H, Zhu C, Gong Q, Zang Y, Evans AC (2009) Uncovering intrinsic modular organization of spontaneous brain activity in humans. PLoS One 4(4):e5226Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Honey CJ, Sporns O (2008) Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks. Hum Brain Mapp 29(7):802–809Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Park CH, Chang WH, Ohn SH, Kim ST, Bang OY, Pascual-Leone A, Kim YH (2011) Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 42(5):1357–1362Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toga AW, Thompson PM (2003) Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci 4(1):37–48Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nichols TE, Holmes AP (2002) Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 15(1):1–25Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Caliandro P, Vecchio F, Miraglia F, Reale G, Della Marca G, La Torre G, Lacidogna G, Iacovelli C, Padua L, Bramanti P, Rossini PM (2017) Small-world characteristics of cortical connectivity changes in acute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31(1):81–94Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bassett DS, Bullmore E (2006) Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist 12(6):512–523Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H, Fink GR (2008) Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 63(2):236–246Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nomura EM, Gratton C, Visser RM, Kayser A, Perez F, D’Esposito M (2010) Double dissociation of two cognitive control networks in patients with focal brain lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(26):12017–12022Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    de Vico Fallani F, Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, la Rocca D, Maksuti E, Salinari S, Babiloni F, Vegso B, Kozmann G, Nagy Z (2009) Evaluation of the brain network organization from EEG signals: a preliminary evidence in stroke patient. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 292:2023–2031Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dum RP, Strick PL (2002) Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate. Physiol Behav 77(4–5):677–682Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O (2013) Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 17(12):683–696Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, Waldvogel D, Wittenberg GF, Ishii K, Cohen LG, Hallett M (2006) Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain 129(Pt 3):791–808Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jones DK, Knosche TR, Turner R (2013) White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 73:239–254Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gong G, He Y, Concha L, Lebel C, Gross DW, Evans AC, Beaulieu C (2009) Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Cereb Cortex 19(3):524–536Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? NeuroImage 34(1):144–155Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann CF, Nichols TE, Ramsey JD, Woolrich MW (2011) Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage 54(2):875–891Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zalesky A, Fornito A, Harding IH, Cocchi L, Yucel M, Pantelis C, Bullmore ET (2010) Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter? NeuroImage 50(3):970–983Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xia M, Wang J, He Y (2013) BrainNet viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One 8(7):e68910Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryShaoxing People’s Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine)ZhejiangChina
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyShaoxing People’s Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine)ZhejiangChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityZhejiangChina
  4. 4.Singapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), Centre for Life ScienceNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  5. 5.Department of Control Science and Engineering, College of Electronics and Information EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations