Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Measuring Teacher Sense of Efficacy: Insights and Recommendations Concerning Scale Design and Data Analysis from Research with Preservice and Inservice Teachers in China

Abstract

In this study, issues concerning the design of scales for measuring teacher sense of efficacy (TSE) are first identified with particular attention to the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES). Psychometric issues concerning analysis and reporting of TSE data are subsequently identified. Recommendations are offered about all identified issues, and these recommendations are taken into account when obtaining and analyzing TSE data from Chinese mainland preservice and inservice teachers. Exploratory factor analyses yielded a single factor for both samples as well as for four subgroups within the inservice teacher sample. Results also provided insights about scale design as well as the TSES being limited for capturing the breadth of TSE. Suggestions are made for improvements in the assessment of TSE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Change history

  • 13 February 2020

    The article Measuring Teacher Sense of Efficacy: Insights and Recommendations Concerning Scale Design and Data Analysis from Research with Preservice and Inservice Teachers in China written by Kang Ma, Robert Trevethan and Shuhong Lu, was originally published on vol. 14, no. 4 of Frontier of Education in China without Open Access. After publication, the authors decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (<ExternalRef><RefSource>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</RefSource><RefTarget Address="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" TargetType="URL"/></ExternalRef>), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    The original article has been corrected.

    Corresponding author: Robert Trevethan

    Email: robertrevethan@gmail.com

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848

  2. Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.020

  3. Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., … Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report No. R-2007-LAUSD). Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2005/R2007.pdf

  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

  5. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for creating self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

  6. Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, L. F. (2016). Preservice teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An opportunity to generate “good research” in the Asia-Pacific region. In S. Garvis & D. Pendergast (Eds.), Asia-Pacific perspectives on teacher self-efficacy (pp. 1–17). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

  7. Blair, E., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Non-response and generalizability in academic research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305283778

  8. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

  9. Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90115-R

  10. Brick, J. M., & Kalton, G. (1996). Handling missing data in survey research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029600500302

  11. Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x

  12. Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2010). Is the motivation to become a teacher related to pre-service teachers’ intentions to remain in the profession? European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903512927

  13. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

  14. Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116

  15. Cattell, R. B., & Vogelmann, S. (1977). A comprehensive trial of the scree and KG criteria for determining the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(3), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1203_2

  16. Chan, C. K. K., & Rao, N. (2009). The paradoxes revisited: The Chinese learner in changing educational contexts. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing context, changing education (pp. 315–349). Hong Kong, China: Springer.

  17. Chan, D. W. (2008a). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 28(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701491833

  18. Chan, D. W. (2008b). General, collective, and domain-specific teacher self-efficacy among Chinese prospective and in-service teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.010

  19. Chang, M-L, & Engelhard, G. (2016). Examining the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale at the item level with Rasch measurement model. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(2), 177–191, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915593835

  20. Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9084-2

  21. Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013193

  22. Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0231

  23. Chesnut, S. R. (2017). On the measurement of preservice teacher commitment: Examining the relationship between four operational definitions and self-efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.003

  24. Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001

  25. Cheung, H. Y. (2006). The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(4), 435–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470600982134

  26. Cheung, H. Y. (2008). Teacher efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai primary in-service teachers. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216877

  27. Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994

  28. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309

  29. Çokluk, Ö., & Koçak, D. (2016). Using Horn’s parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328

  30. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  31. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

  32. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

  33. Crawford, A. V., Green, S. B., Levy, R., Lo, W-J., Scott, L., Svetina, D., & Thompson, M. S. (2010). Evaluation of parallel analysis method for determining the number of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(6), 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410379332

  34. Crutzen, R., & Peters, G-J. Y. (2017). Scale quality: Alpha is an inadequate estimate and factor-analytic evidence is needed first of all. Health Psychology Review, 11(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1124240

  35. Darbyshire, P., & McDonald, H. (2004). Choosing response scale labels and length: Guidance for researchers and clients. Australasian Journal of Market Research, 12(2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1551929500051968

  36. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962

  37. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., … Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  38. Data cleaning. (n.d.). Practical analysis of nutritional data (PANDA). Tulane University. Retrieved from http://www.tulane.edu/~panda2/Analysis2/datclean/dataclean.htm

  39. Dede, H., Yilmaz, Z. A., & Ilhan, N. (2017). Investigation of the self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service science teachers in terms of following and using the innovations in the field of education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2025

  40. Dixon, J. K. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis. In B. H. Munro (Ed.), Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed., pp. 321–349). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  41. Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216653975

  42. Duffin, L. C., French, B. F., & Patrick, H. (2012). The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.004

  43. Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011

  44. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R., C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

  45. Fackler, S., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2016). Teachers’ self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002

  46. Feng, Y. J., & Wang, M. (2014). A survey study of Chinese pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and attitude to inclusive education. In CIEd, University of Minho (Eds.), Proceedings of Braga 2014: Embracing inclusive approaches for children and youth with special needs (pp. 695–699). Braga, Portugal: CIEd, University of Minho.

  47. Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2010). Examining the factor structure of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 78(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903224461

  48. Friedman, I. A., & Kass, E. (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00027-6

  49. Gao, L. B, & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P. R. China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons, International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066926

  50. Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2014). On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(3), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005

  51. Gavora, P. (2010). Slovak pre-service teacher self-efficacy: Theoretical and research considerations. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 17–30.

  52. George, S. V., Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2018). Early career teachers’ self-efficacy: A longitudinal study from Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 62(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944118779601

  53. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569

  54. Gong, Y., & Lai, C. (2018). Technology integration into the language classroom: Developmental trajectory of beginning teachers. Frontiers of Education in China, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-018-0001-5

  55. Goodwin, L. D., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Understanding correlation: Factors that affect the size of r. Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.3.249-266

  56. Gu, L. M., Chen, J., & Li, J. C. (2015). The leadership of “banzhuren” in Chinese school: Based on the sample survey in Changzhou city of China. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n4a13

  57. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994) Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003627

  58. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis. In J. F. Hair Jr., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, & R. E. Anderson (Eds.), Multivariate data analysis (pp. 89–149). Harlow, UK: Pearson.

  59. Hatlevik, I. K. R. (2017). The impact of prospective teachers’ perceived competence on subsequent perceptions as schoolteachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(7), 810–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1322056

  60. Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900204

  61. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675

  62. He, N., & Miao, D. M. (2006). Retrospect and prospect of studies of teacher efficacy in China. US-China Education Review, 3(3), 31–36.

  63. Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655

  64. Hellerstein, J. M. (2008). Quantitative data cleaning for large databases. Retrieved from http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/jmh/papers/cleaning-unece.pdf

  65. Heneman, H. G. III, Kimball, S., & Milanowski, A. (2006). The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale: Validation evidence and behavioral prediction. WCER Working paper No2006-7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496313

  66. Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_1

  67. Herman, K. C., Hickmon-Rosa, J., Reinke, W. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping and associated student outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717732066

  68. Ho, I. T. (2004). A comparison of Australian and Chinese teachers’ attributions for student problem behaviors. Educational Psychology, 24(3), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000211706

  69. Ho, I. T., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Australian and Chinese teacher efficacy: Similarities and differences in personal instruction, discipline, guidance efficacy and beliefs in external determinants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.09.009

  70. Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M., & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404267287

  71. Hoi, C. K. W., Zhou, M. M., Teo, T., & Nie, Y. Y. (2017). Measuring efficacy sources: Development and validation of the Sources of Teacher Efficacy Questionnaire (STEQ) for Chinese teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 54(7), 756–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22025

  72. Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.003

  73. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1086/461729

  74. Htang, L. K. (2018). Measurement of teacher sense of efficacy: A study with Myanmar in-service teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(35), 39–18.

  75. Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8

  76. Jackson, W. (2003). Methods: Doing social research (3rd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Prentice Hall.

  77. Jacoby, J., & Matell, M. S. (1971). Three-point Likert scales are good enough. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377100800414

  78. Kennedy, K., & Hui, S. K. F. (2004). Self-efficacy as a key attribute for curriculum leadership—Linking individual and organizational capacity to meet the challenges of curriculum reform. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Commonwealth Council of Educational Administration and Management, Hong Kong.

  79. Kennedy, K. J., & Hui, S. K. F. (2006). Developing teacher leaders to facilitate Hong Kong’s curriculum reforms: Self-efficacy as a measure of teacher growth. International Journal of Educational Reform, 15(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678790601500107

  80. Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000330

  81. Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y. F., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/jxedpsych.2008.08.001

  82. Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

  83. Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8

  84. Kleinsasser, R. C. (2014). Teacher efficacy in “Teaching and Teacher Education”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.007

  85. Krosnick, J., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–313). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

  86. Li, Y. (2015). Accessing fellow academics as research participants: Constraints, collegiality, and “academic citizenship.” Publications, 3(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications30201312

  87. Liu, Y., Zumbo, B. D (2007). The impact of outliers on Cronbach’s coefficient alpha estimate of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(4), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406296976

  88. Liu, Y., Zumbo, B. D., & Wu, A. D. (2012). A demonstration of the impact of outliers on the decisions about the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411410878

  89. Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73

  90. Lu, M. H., Hao, L., Chen, X. M., & Potměšsilc, M. (2018). Teacher efficacy, work engagement, and social support among Chinese special education school teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00648

  91. Ma, K. (2017). Classroom ready? Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for their first professional experience placement (Unpublished master’s thesis). Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

  92. Ma, K., & Trevethan, R. (2020). Efficacy perceptions of preservice and inservice teachers in China: Insights concerning culture and measurement. Frontiers of Education in China. In Press.

  93. Malinen, O.-P. (2013). Inclusive education from teachers’ perspective: Examining pre- and in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes in mainland China (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.

  94. Malinen, O.-P. (2016). Self-efficacy research in mainland China. In S. Garvis & D. Pendergast (Eds.), Asia-Pacific perspectives on teacher self-efficacy (pp. 115–126). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

  95. Malinen, O.-P., Savolainen, H., & Xu, J. C. (2012). Beijing in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.004

  96. Malinen, O.-P., Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Xu, J. C., Nel, M., Nel, N., & Tlale, D. (2013). Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.004

  97. Malinen, O.-P., Savolainen, H., & Xu, J. C. (2013). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices among mainland Chinese pre-service teachers. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 16(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-16.2.82

  98. Manzar-Abbas, S. S., & Lu, L. J. (2015). Self-efficacy beliefs of Chinese primary school teachers. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 30(2), 289–303.

  99. Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854

  100. McCampbell, S. M. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

  101. McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  102. McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144

  103. Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210902998466

  104. Mischo, C. (2015). Early childhood teachers’ perceived competence during transition from teacher education to work: Results from a longitudinal study. Professional Development in Education, 41(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.886282

  105. Moore-Hayes, C. (2011). Technology integration preparedness and its influence on teacher-efficacy. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2B597

  106. Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4

  107. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1998). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  108. Nie, Y. Y., Lau, S., & Liau, A. K. (2012). The teacher efficacy scale: A reliability and validity study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 414–121. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/14287

  109. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  110. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  111. O’Neill, S., & Stephenson, J. (2012). Exploring Australian pre-service teachers sense of efficacy, its sources, and some possible influences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.008

  112. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris, France: OECD.

  113. Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(6), 1–12. https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=6

  114. Ottley, J. R., Piasta, S. B., Mauck, S. A., O’Connell, A., Weber-Mayrer, M., & Justice, L. M. (2015). The nature and extent of change in early childhood educators’ language and literacy knowledge and beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.08.005

  115. Overbaugh, R., & Lu, R. (2008). The impact of a NCLB-EETT funded professional development program on teacher self-efficacy and resultant implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782522

  116. Paine, L., & Ma, L. P. (1993). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(93)90009-9

  117. Pallant, J. F. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (6th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

  118. Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient alpha: Interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i4.653

  119. Pena, E. D. (2007). Lost in translation: Methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Development, 78(4), 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01064.x

  120. Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-service student-teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6

  121. Perera, H. N., Calkins, C., & Part, R. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy profiles: Determination, outcomes, and generalizability across teaching level. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.006

  122. Pfitzner-Eden, F. (2016). I feel less confident so I quit? Do true changes in teacher self-efficacy predict changes in preservice teachers’ intention to quit their teaching degree? Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.018

  123. Pfitzner-Eden, F., Thiel, F., & Horsley, J. (2014). An adapted measure of teacher self-efficacy for preservice teachers: Exploring its validity across two countries. Zeitschrift für Padagogische Psychologie, 28(3), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000125

  124. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  125. Poulou, M. (2007). Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: Student teachers’ perceptions. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066693

  126. Pratt, D. D. (1992). Chinese conceptions of learning and teaching: A Westerner’s attempt at understanding. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 11(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137920110404

  127. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02

  128. Robinson, M. A. (2018). Using multi-item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21852

  129. Ruan, J. N., Nie, Y. Y., Hong, J., Monobe, G., Zheng, G. M., Kambara, H., & You, S. (2015). Cross-cultural validation of teachers’ sense of efficacy scale in three Asian countries: Test of measurement invariance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(8), 769–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915574021

  130. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

  131. Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.8.4.350

  132. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

  133. Shi, Q. M. (2014). Relationship between teacher efficacy and self-reported instructional practices: An examination of five Asian countries/regions using TIMSS 2011 data. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397041

  134. Shi, Q. M. (2016). Interrelationships among teacher self-efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.

  135. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0

  136. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611

  137. Song, H., Zhu, X. D., & Liu, L. B. (2013). The honourable road and its impact on teacher practice: An analysis of China’s national honour system in cultivating professional development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.809055

  138. Stipek, D. (2012). Context matters: Effects of student characteristics and perceived administrative and parental support on teachers’ self-efficacy. The Elementary School Journal, 112(4), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/664489

  139. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18

  140. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  141. Swan, B. G., Wolf, K. J., & Cano, J. (2011). Changes in teacher self-efficacy from the student teaching experience through the third year of teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.02128

  142. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

  143. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

  144. Teacher sense of self efficacy survey. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/teacher_efficacy_scale.pdf

  145. Tian, M. (2011). Distributed leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy: The case studies of three Chinese schools in Shanghai (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

  146. Trevethan, R. (2009). Self-assessment of foot health: Requirements, issues, practicalities, and challenges. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 99(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.7547/0990460

  147. Tsai, C-C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology integration-instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.810

  148. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

  149. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

  150. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202

  151. Tsigilis, N., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Koustelios, A. (2007). Applicability of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale to educators teaching innovative programs. The International Journal of Educational Management, 21(7), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710822229

  152. Tsui, K-T, & Kennedy, K. J. (2009). Evaluating the Chinese version of the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (C-TSE): Translation adequacy and factor structure. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v18i2.1326

  153. Turner, K., Jones, E., Davies, M., & Ramsay, S. (2004). Student teacher perceptions of preparedness for teaching. Educating: Weaving Research into Practice, 3, 184–193.

  154. Tzeng, O. C. S. (1992). On reliability and number of principal components: Joinder with Cliff and Kaiser. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(3), 929–930. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.75.3.929

  155. Van den Broeck, J., Cunningham, S. A., Eeckels, R., & Herbst, K. (2005). Data cleaning: Detecting, diagnosing, and editing data abnormalities. PLoS Medicine, 2(10), e267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020267

  156. Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy in cross-national perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.006

  157. von Suchodoletz, A., Jamil, F.M., Larsen, R. A. A. A., & Hamre, B. K. (2018). Personal and contextual factors associated with growth in preschool teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs during a longitudinal professional development study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.009

  158. Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005

  159. Wang, M., Zan, F., Liu, J. Q., Liu, C. L., & Sharma, U. (2012). A survey study of Chinese in-service teachers’ self-efficacy about inclusive education. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 15(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-15.2.107

  160. Watkins, D. (2000). Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural perspective. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430050011407

  161. Weinstein, C. S. (1988). Preservice teachers’ expectations about the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90022-4

  162. Wheatley, K. F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.009

  163. Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

  164. Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181

  165. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007

  166. Wyatt, M. (2014). Towards a re-conceptualization of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Tackling enduring problems with the quantitative research and moving on. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.742050

  167. Yin, H.-B., Lee, J. C.-K., Jin, Y.-L., & Zhang, Z.-H. (2013). The effect of trust on teacher empowerment: The mediation of teacher efficacy. Educational Studies, 39(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.666339

  168. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

  169. Yousuf Zai, S. A. (2016). Investigating the factor structure of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale with Pakistani in-service and pre-service teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.

  170. Yousuf Zai, S. A., & Munshi, P. (2016). Construct validity to examine the latent traits of teacher self-efficacy instrument. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(4), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.34.1944

  171. Yu, X. B., Wang, P. Y., Zhai, X. S., Dai, H., & Yang, Q. (2015). The effect of work stress on job burnout among teachers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 122(3), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0716-5

  172. Yuan, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Exploring student teachers’ motivation change in initial teacher education: A Chinese perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.010

  173. Zheng, X., Yin, H. B., & Li, Z. L. (2019). Exploring the relationships among instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher self-efficacy in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(6), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218764176

  174. Zhou, L., & Nunes, M. B. (2013). Doing qualitative research in Chinese contexts: Lessons learned from conducting interviews in a Chinese healthcare environment. Library Hi Tech, 31(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2012-0104

  175. Zijlstra, W. P., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2011). Outliers in questionnaire data: Can they be detected and should they be removed? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(2), 186–212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29789477

  176. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sylvia McAra and Michael Moxham suggested improvements to earlier drafts of this manuscript. Colleagues in Australia and China, including Qing Xu, Yichi Zhang, and Tengfei Gong, provided assistance with translating and back translating the surveys, and other colleagues helped with accessing participants.

Author information

Correspondence to Robert Trevethan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, K., Trevethan, R. & Lu, S. Measuring Teacher Sense of Efficacy: Insights and Recommendations Concerning Scale Design and Data Analysis from Research with Preservice and Inservice Teachers in China. Front Educ China 14, 612–686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0029-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • teacher sense of efficacy (TSE)
  • teacher self-efficacy
  • Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES)
  • scale design
  • response rate
  • factor analysis
  • China