Advertisement

Frontiers of Education in China

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 117–137 | Cite as

Do Pay-for-Grades Programs Encourage Student Academic Cheating? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

  • Tao Li
  • Yisu ZhouEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Pay-for-grades programs aim to incentivize families and students to engage in specified behaviors given financial remittance. In addition to doubts over its effectiveness, educators worry that monetary incentives could skew student learning motivation and lead to academic cheating. Using a randomized control trial in 11 Chinese primary schools, we studied the effects of pay-for-grades programs on academic cheating. We randomly assigned 82 classrooms into treatment or control conditions, and used a statistical algorithm to determine the occurrence of cheating. While our data indicates a concerning level of cheating overall, our experiment did not find any relationship between academic cheating and the pay-for-grades program. Finally, we discuss the feasibility of such policies in improving learning outcomes and its policy implications.

Keywords

pay-for-grades cheating randomized control trial China primary school 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alutu, A. N., & Aluede, O. (2006). Secondary schools students’ perception of examination malpractices and examination ethics. Journal of Human Ecology, 20(4), 295–300.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359–372. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445 Google Scholar
  3. Behrman, J. R., Parker, S. W., Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2015). Aligning learning incentives of students and teachers: Results from a social experiment in Mexican high schools. Journal of Political Economy, 123(2), 325–364. https://doi.org/10.1086/675910 Google Scholar
  4. Bettinger, E. P. (2012). Paying to learn: The effect of financial incentives on elementary school test scores. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00217 Google Scholar
  5. Carrell, S. E., Sacerdote, B. I., & West, J. E. (2013). From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica, 81(3), 855–882. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10168 Google Scholar
  6. Chen, J. X., Wang, D., & Zhou, Y. S. (2017). Education for population control: Migrant children’s education under new policies in Beijing. In Y.-K. Cha, J. Gundara, S.-H. Ham, & M. Lee (Eds.), Multicultural education in glocal perspectives: Policy and institutionalization (pp. 153–166). Singapore, Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2222-7_11 Google Scholar
  7. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T. B. (2009). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Dearden, L. (2015). Parents risk lives climbing exam buildings to help hundreds of Indian students cheat. Independent. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/parents-risk-lives-climbing-exam-buildings-to-help-hundreds-of-indian-students-cheat-10120933.html
  10. Diekhoff, G. M., Labeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343–353.Google Scholar
  11. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Echenique, F., & Fryer, R. G. (2007). A measure of segregation based on social interactions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 441–485. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.441 Google Scholar
  13. Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1990). Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 44–52.Google Scholar
  14. Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121 Google Scholar
  15. Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.01.004 Google Scholar
  16. Hauber, R. P., Rice, M. H., Howell, C. C., & Carmon, M. (1998). Anger and blood pressure readings in children. Applied Nursing Research, 11(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(98)80021-9 Google Scholar
  17. Hellum-Alexander, A. (2010). Effective teaching strategies for alleviating math anxiety and increasing self-efficacy in secondary students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Evergreen State College.Google Scholar
  18. Heyneman, S. P. (2004). Education and corruption. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 637–648. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.02.005 Google Scholar
  19. Heyneman, S. P., Anderson, K. H., & Nuraliyeva, N. (2007). The cost of corruption in higher education. Comparative Education Review, 52(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/524367 Google Scholar
  20. Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 843–877. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698441 Google Scholar
  21. Kobiowu, S. V., & Alao, F. (2009). The challenges of examination management in the developing societies: The Nigerian scenario. International Journal of African & African-American Studies, 4(2), 39–47.Google Scholar
  22. Le, V.-N. (2015). Should students be paid for achievement? A review of the impact of monetary incentives on test performance. Working paper No. 2014-006. Chicago, IL NORC at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Li, T., Han, L., Zhang, L., & Rozelle, S. (2014). Encouraging classroom peer interactions: Evidence from Chinese migrant schools. Journal of Public Economics, (111), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjpubeco.2013.12.014 Google Scholar
  24. Matson, J. L., & Boisjoli, J. A. (2009). The token economy for children with intellectual disability and/or autism: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.04.001 Google Scholar
  25. McCabe, D. L. (2005). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty & educational opportunity. Liberal education, 91(3), 26–31.Google Scholar
  26. McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9092-9 Google Scholar
  27. Morais de Sa e Silva, M. (2015). Conditional cash transfers and improved education quality: A political search for the policy link. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.09.003 Google Scholar
  28. Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1046 Google Scholar
  29. Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K. G. (2011). Priceless: The nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 159–184. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.1.159 Google Scholar
  30. Osipian, A. L. (2009). Corruption hierarchies in higher education in the former soviet bloc. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.08.006 Google Scholar
  31. Ravitch, D. (2000). The great school wars: New York City, 1805–1973: A history of the public schools as battlefield of social change (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rice, M., & Broome, M. E. (2004). Incentives for children in research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04030.x Google Scholar
  33. Rice, M., Howell, C., Hauber, R., & Carmon, M. (1999). Relationships among physical activity and weight, blood pressure readings, anger and anger expression in children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.Google Scholar
  34. Romero, M., Riascos, Á., & Jara, D. (2014, August). A derivation of the optimal answer-copying index and some applications (Documentos Cede No. 012061). Universidad De Los Andes-Cede.Google Scholar
  35. Schab, F. (1991). Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence, 26(104), 839–847.Google Scholar
  36. Shei, C. (2005). Plagiarism, Chinese learners and western convention. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 2(1), 97–113.Google Scholar
  37. Simões, A. A., & Sabates, R. (2014). The contribution of bolsa família to the educational achievement of economically disadvantaged children in Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development, 39, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.07.012 Google Scholar
  38. Slavin, R. E. (2010). Can financial incentives enhance educational outcomes? Evidence from international experiments. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.001 Google Scholar
  39. Syam, M. I. (2014). The factors that lead to cheating in exams and how to avoid them. GSTF Journal on Education (JEd), 1(2).Google Scholar
  40. Tao, F. B., Zhang, H. B., Wang, D. B., Yang, S. F., Su, P. Y., Feng, E. C., …, & Zhang, L. Y. (2004). 社会文化因素对安徽省农村儿童体罚行为的影响 [The influence of sociocultural factors of spanking in Anhui Province rural areas]. 中国全科医学 [Chinese General Practice], 7(3), 172–174.Google Scholar
  41. Van Yperen, N. W., Hamstra, M. R., & van de Klauw, M. (2011). To win, or not to lose, at any cost: The impact of achievement goals on cheating. British Journal of Management, 22(s1), S5–S15. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00702.x Google Scholar
  42. Vlaardingerbroek, B., Shehab, S. S., & Alameh, S. K. (2011). The problem of open cheating and invigilator compliance in the Lebanese brevet and baccalauréat examinations. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 297–302. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.03.002 Google Scholar
  43. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024 Google Scholar
  44. Wollack, J. A. (1997). A nominal response model approach for detecting answer copying. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(4), 307–320. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970214002 Google Scholar
  45. Wollack, J. A. (2004). Detecting answer copying on high-stakes tests. The Bar Examiner, 73, 35–45.Google Scholar
  46. Xiong, Y. (2015). The broken ladder: Why education provides no upward mobility for migrant children in China. The China Quarterly, (221), 161–184. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015000016 Google Scholar
  47. Ye, B. B., Wei, Q. Q., & Liang, D. (2012). 进城务工人员子女初中阶段数学焦虑调查研究—来自桂林市石油中学与穿山中学的案例 [Research on mathematics anxiety of the migrant workers’ children in junior middle school—evidence from Guilin Shiyou Middle School and Chuanshan Middle School]. 数学教育学报 [Journal of Mathematics Education], 21(3), 43–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and Public Administration, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of MacauMacaoChina
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of MacauMacaoChina

Personalised recommendations