Advertisement

Frontiers of Education in China

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 163–192 | Cite as

Global Educational Research in Western Times: The Rise and Plight of Chinese Educational Research

  • Robert J. Tierney
Research Article

Abstract

The paper offers a critical appraisal of the global knowledge developments in education using China’s contributions in a fashion similar to a case study. The paper scrutinizes the complicity of Western educational research to euro-centric biases and discusses the pursuit of a global epistemological eclecticism. To support this claim, the magnitude of the global knowledge economy, including country-by-country comparisons, is explored together with data pertaining to the success rate of submissions and citations. These data are used as the basis for arguments that the dominant research practices and developmental work serve Western interests, Western thought and a Western economy tied to standardization rather than eastern epistemological interests.

Keywords

Chinese educational research globalization Westernization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdi, A. A. (2015). Decolonizing global citizenship education: Critical reflections on the epistemic intersections of location, knowledge, and learning.In A. A. Abdi, L. Shultz, & T. Pillay (Eds.). Decolonizing global citizenship education (pp.11–26). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  2. Alatas, S. F. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism.New Delhi, India: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bazerman, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style: The APA publication manual as behaviorist rhetoric.In J. S. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. N. McCloskey (Eds.). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs (pp.125–144). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, K. H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science.Cambridge, England: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R., Collyer, F., Maia, J., Morrell, R. (2017). Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices.International Sociology, 32(1). 21–37.https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916676913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings, S., & Hoebink, P. (2017). Representation of academics from developing countries as authors and editorial board members in scientific journals: Does this matter to the field of development studies? European Journal of Development Research, 29(2), 369–383.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0002-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elsevier. (2016). International comparative performance of the UKresearch base 2016.Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/507321/ELS-BEIS-Web.pdf Google Scholar
  9. Feng, H. Y., Beckett, G. H., & Huang, D. W. (2013). From “import” to “import-export” oriented internationalization: The impact of national policy on scholarly publication in China.Language Policy, 12, 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9285-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar.TESOL Quarterly, 34(1). 127–150.doi:10.2307/3588099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives.London, England: Profile.Google Scholar
  12. Grigorov, S. K., & Fleuri, R. M. (2012). Ecopedagogy: Educating for a new eco-social intercultural perspective.Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://repositorio.ufsc.br.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/184829/ap2012_GRIGOROV_FLEURI_Ecopedagogy-Educating-for-a- New-Eco-social-Intercultural-Perspective..pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
  13. Guilford, G. (2013). China is investing more than ever in science, but it’s not paying off.Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://qz.com/136012/china-is-investing-more-than-everin-science-but-its-not-paying-off/ Google Scholar
  14. Hampton, E. (1995). Toward a redefinition of Indian education.In M. Battiste & J. Barman (Eds.). First nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (pp.5–42). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hu, X. J., & Rouseau, R. (2009). A comparative study of the differences in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries.Sciencometrics, 81(2). 475–491.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2202-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyland, K. (2015). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, K. (2004). 涵养科学精神: 教育研究方法论的省思 [Building scientific spirit: Reflections on the methodology in educational research].北京大学学报 (哲学社会科学 版) [Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)], 41(1), 63–70.Google Scholar
  18. Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision.London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kan, W., Tierney, R. J., & Xiang, R. (2017, April). Empirical literacy education scholarship across space and time during the modern period.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, G. M. (2016). Transcultural digital literacies: Cross-border connections and self-representations in an online forum.Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2). 199–219.https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, Y. Y. (2006). A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopoliticallyoriented case study.English for Specific Purposes, 25(4). 456–478.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, Y. Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2007). Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication.Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2). 100–117.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu, Y. L., & Hayhoe, R. (2004). Chinese higher learning: The transition process from classical knowledge patterns to modern disciplines 1860–1910.In C. Charle, J. Schriewer, & P. Wagner (Eds). Transnational intellectual networks: Forms of academic knowledge and the search for cultural identities (pp.269–306). New York, NY: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Misiaszek, G. W. (2013). Ecopedagogy and citizenship in the age of globalisation: Connections between environmental and global citizenship education to save the planet.European Journal of Education, 50(3). 2015.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12138 Google Scholar
  25. Moiwo, J., & Tao, F. (2013). The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership.Scientometrics, 95, 1031–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgan, B. (2018). Beyond the guest paradigm: Eurocentric education and aboriginal peoples in NSW.In E. McKinley & L. Smith (Eds.). Handbook of indigenous education.Singapore, Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, N., Barrera IV, E. S., Skinner. K., & Fuentes, A. M. (2016). Language, culture and border lives: “Mestizaje” as positionality /Lengua, cultura y vidas de frontera: el mestizaje como posicionalidad.Culture and Education/CulturayEducación, 28(1). 1–41.https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.980121 Google Scholar
  28. Nozaki, Y. (2009). Orientalism, the West and non-West binary, and postcolonial perspectives in cross-cultural research and education.In M. Apple, W. Au, & L. Gandin (Eds.). International handbook of critical education (pp.382–390). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Paré, A. (2010). Slow the presses: Concerns about premature publication.In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.). Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp.30–46). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Park, J. (2011). Metamorphosis of Confucian heritage culture and the possibility of an Asian education research methodology.Comparative Education, 47(3). 381–393.https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.586769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park, J. (2017). Knowledge production with Asia-centric research methodology.Comparative Education Review, 61(4). 760–779.https://doi.org/10.1086/693980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng, C. H. (2011). Focus on quality, not just quantity.Nature, 475(7356). 267.doi:10.1038/475267aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Potter, I. (2017). Connecting the dots: From submission to decision, the fate of scholarly papers.Retrieved June 6, 2018, from http://images.mailinfo.clarivate.com/Web/ThomsonReutersScience/%7B69272fbc-53e2-44bd-9159-fffac85eb662%7D_Clarivate_2017-FBF-Hotspot-Connecting-the-dots.pdf Google Scholar
  34. Qiu, J. (2010). Publish or perish in China.Nature, 463(7278). 142–143.doi:10.1038/463142aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qiu, J. (2015). Safeguarding research integrity in China.National Science Review, 2(1). 122–125.doi:10.1093/nsr/nwv002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quan, W., Chen, B. K., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016).Journal of Information Management, 69(5). 486–502.https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0014 Google Scholar
  37. Research Information Network. (2010). If you build it, they will come? How researchers perceive and use the web 2.0.Retrieved December 18, 2010, from http://rinarchive.jisccollections.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevanceweb-20-researchers
  38. Rogers, R. (2017). Literacy research, racial consciousness, and equitable flows of knowledge [motion picture].Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oyZ2altlqk Google Scholar
  39. de Sousa Santos, B., Nunes, & Meneses, M. P. (2007). Opening up the canon of knowledge and recognition of difference.In B. de Sousa Santos, (Ed.). Another knowledge is possible: Beyond northern epistemologies (pp.xix-lxii). London, England: Verso.Google Scholar
  40. Singh, M. (2011). Learning from China to internationalise Australian research education: Pedagogies of intellectual equality and “optimal ignorance” of ERA journal rankings.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4). 355–365.https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.617090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh, M., Fenway, J., & Apple, M. W. (2005). Globalizing education: Perspectives from above and below.In M. W. Apple, J. Fenway, & M. Singh (Eds.). Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies and politics (pp.1–31). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, G. H. (2000). Protecting and respecting indigenous knowledge.In M. Battiste (Ed.). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision.(pp. 209–224). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, G. H. (2015). Transforming research: The indigenous struggle for social, cultural, and economic justice within and through education [motion picture].Retrieved December 5, 2015 from http://www.aera.net/Events-Meetings/Annual-Meeting/Previous-Annual-Meetings/2015-Annual-Meeting/2015-Annual-Meeting-Webcasts/Transforming-Research-T he-Indigenous-Struggle-for-Social-Cultural-and-Economic-Justice-Within-and-Through-Ed ucation/mid/38460/dnnprintmode/true?SkinSrc=%5BG%5DSkins%2F_default%2FNo+Ski n&ContainerSrc=%5BG%5DContainers%2F_default%2FNo+ContainerGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies.Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, L. T. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty.In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.85–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Sumner, A., & Tribe, M. (2009). International development studies: Theories and methods in research and practice. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Takayama, K. (2009). Progressive education and critical education scholarship in Japan: Toward the democratization of critical educational studies.In M. Apple, W. Au, & L. Gandin (Eds.). International handbook of critical education (pp.354–367). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Takayama, K., Sriprakash, A., & Connell, R. (2017). Toward a postcolonial comparative and international education.Comparative Education Review, 61(S1). S1–S24.https://doi.org/10.1086/690455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tam, K. Y. B., & Chen, M. L. (2010). Examining scholarship in China’s academe: An exploratory study.Higher Education, 60(1). 69–84.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9288-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomson Reuters. (2012). Global publishing: Changes in submission trends and the impact on scholarly publishers.Retrieved June 6, 2017, from https://www.prnewswire.com/newsreleases/thomson-reuters-quantifies-asias-rise-in-global-submission-rates-to-academic-publi shers-156996635.htmlGoogle Scholar
  51. Tian, M. (2013). 中国青年学者英文学术论文写作与发表经历的个案研究 [Young Chinese researchers’ experiences of writing English papers for scholarly publication: A case study].中国人民大学教育学刊 [Renmin University of China Education Journal], (1), 135–147.Google Scholar
  52. Tian, M., Su, Y., & Ru, X. (2016). Perish or publish in China: Pressures on young Chinese scholars to publish in internationally indexed journals.Publications, 4(2). 9.https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tierney, R. J., & Kan, W. (2016). Knowledge mobilization within and across the People’s Republic of China and the United States: A cross-national study of internationalization of educational research.American Educational Research Journal, 53(6). 1759–1791.https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trigos-Carillo, L., & Rogers, R. (2017). Latin American influences on multiliteracies: From epistemological diversity to cognitive.Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1). 373–388.doi:10.1177/2381336917718500Google Scholar
  55. Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review.Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4). 250–263.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ware, M. N., & Mabe, M. (2012). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (3rd.ed.). Oxford, England: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Yang, R. (2005). Internationalisation, indigenisation and educational research in China.Australian Journal of Education, 49(1). 66–88.https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410504900104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang, R. (2006). What counts as “scholarship”? Problematising educational policy research in China.Globalization, Societies and Education, 4(2). 207–221.https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720600752577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhao, J. J., Beckett, G., & Wang, L. L. (2017). Evaluating the research quality of education journals in China: Implications for increasing global impact in peripheral countries.Review of Educational Research, 87(3). 583–618.https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317690813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations