Advertisement

Family, Work, and Spatial Mobility: The Influence of Commuting on the Subjective Well-Being of Couples

  • Ana BrömmelhausEmail author
  • Michael Feldhaus
  • Monika Schlegel
Article

Abstract

Previous research shows that commuting is often accompanied by increased stress, exhaustion and less time for partners and children. On the basis of the life course approach and work-life balance theory, we argue that these negative outcomes also influence the dynamics of the social relationships of individuals who live together in the same household. Most research has focused on the commuter, whereas less is known regarding how commuting affects the subjective well-being of other household members, in this case, the partner. Our paper contributes to this research gap by analysing the interdependencies of parents who commute in regard to their overall and domain-specific well-being. We use pooled data from three waves of the German Family Panel, which includes standardised information related to working conditions and job-related mobility as well as family dynamics from both parents’ perspectives. The resulting subsample has N = 2443 dyads in families. Our dyadic analysis shows negative spillover effects of commuting times on all included measures of subjective well-being, but only for mothers. Moreover, there are two crossover effects: a negative crossover effect from mothers commuting on fathers’ satisfaction with family life and a positive crossover effect of fathers commuting on mothers’ satisfaction with social contacts outside the family (i.e. friends). Overall, the findings indicate that mothers own commuting works as a more general burden, whereas fathers seem to suffer more from their partner’s commuting time than vice versa.

Keywords

Well-being Commuting Dyadic analysis Crossover effects Spillover effects 

Notes

References

  1. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of wellbeing: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthaud-Day, M. L., Rode, J. C., Mooney, C. H., & Near, J. P. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74, 445–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). The spillover-crossover model. In J. G. Grzywacz & E. Demerouti (Eds.), New frontiers in work and family research (pp. 54–70). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufli, W. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58(5), 661–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakker, A. A., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover- crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, R. C., Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., Pleck, J. H., & Marshall, N. L. (1995). Changes in job and marital experience and change in psychological distress: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernardi, L., Bollmann, G., Potarca, G., & Rossier, J. (2017). Multidimensionality of well-being and spillover effects across life domains: How do parenthood and personality affect changes in domain-specific satisfaction? Research in Human Development, 14(1), 26–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1268893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Böhm, S., & Diewald, M. (2012). Auswirkungen belastender Arbeitsbedingungen auf die Qualität privater Lebensverhältnisse. WSI Mitteilungen, 2(2012), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brüderl, J., Castiglioni, L., Krieger, U., Ludwig, V., Pforr, K., & Schumann, N. (2010): Pairfam data manual, wave 1. Mannheim.Google Scholar
  12. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ). (2016). Männer-Perspektiven. Penzberg: Auf dem Weg zu mehr Gleichstellung.Google Scholar
  13. Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collet, B., & Dauber, A. (2010). Gender and job mobility. In N. F. Schneider & B. Collet (Eds.), Mobile living across Europe II (pp. 173–194). Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Cramm, J. M. & Nieboer, A. P. (2016). Is “disease management” the answer to our problems? No! Population health management and (disease) prevention require “management of overall well-being” BMC Health Services Research 16: 500.Google Scholar
  16. Crouter, A. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of work-family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crouter, A. C., & Bumpus, M. F. (2001). Linking parents´ work stress to children’s and adolescents´ psychological adjustment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demerouti, E., Derks, D., ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work-family balance, and well-being. In C. K. Korunka & P. Hoonakker (Eds.), The impact of ICT on quality of working life (pp. 123–141). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diewald, M., Böhm, S., Graf, T., & Hoherz, S. (2013). Berufliche Anforderungen und ihre Auswirkungen auf das Privatleben von doppelerwerbstätigen Paaren. Gender, Sonderheft, 2, 99–119.Google Scholar
  22. Drobnič, S., Beham, B., & Präg, P. (2010). Good job, good life? Working conditions and quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 99, 205–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9586-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldhaus, M., & Schlegel, M. (2013). Job-related circular mobility and the quality of intimate relationships. In Comparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 38, 315–340.Google Scholar
  25. Feldhaus, M., & Schlegel, M. (2015). Living apart together and living together apart: Impacts of partnership- related and job-related circular mobility on partnership quality. In C. Aybek, J. Huinink, & R. Muttarak (Eds.), Spatial Mobility, Migration, and Family Dynamics (pp. 115–139) Dordrecht. Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, G. G. (2002). Work/personal life balance: A construct development study (doctoral dissertation, bowling State University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B - The Sciences and Engineering, 63(1-B), 575.Google Scholar
  27. Forgeard, M. J. C., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1, 79–106.Google Scholar
  28. Franche, R. L., Williams, A., Ibrahim, S., Grace, S. L., Mustard, C., Minor, B., & Stewart, D. E. (2006). Path analysis of work conditions and work-family spillover as modifiable workplace factors associated with depressive symptomatology. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 22, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and public choice. Public Choice, 144, 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frone, M. R., & Yardley, J. K. (1996). Workplace family-supportive programs: Predictors of employed parents’ importance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frone, M. R., Russel, M., & Cooper, L. M. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geisler, E., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2006). Müttererwerbstätigkeit in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 18, 333–360.Google Scholar
  34. Gloger, T. (2007). Arbeitszufriedenheit im Kontext der Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf in Europa. Dissertation, LMU München: Fakultät für Psychologie und Pädagogik.Google Scholar
  35. Gottholmseder, G., Nowotny, K., Pruckner, G. J., & Theurl, E. (2009). Stress perception and commuting. Health Economics, 18(5), 559–576.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction. A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grzywacz, J. G., McDonald, D. A., & Almeida, D. M. (2002). Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor-force. Family Relations, 51, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gustafsson, P. (2006). Work-related travel, gender and family obligations. Work, Employment and Society, 20, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hofmeister, H. (2005). The geographic mobility of couples in the United States. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 17(2), 115–128.Google Scholar
  41. Hofmeister, H., & Schneider, F. (2010). Job Mobilities in Europe: Core findings, policy implications and future outlook. In N. F. Schneider & B. Collet (Eds.), Mobile living across Europe II (pp. 337–356). Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Huinink, J., & Feldhaus, M. (2009). Family research from the life course perspective. In International Sociology, 24(3), 299–324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909102910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huinink, J., & Feldhaus, M. (2012). Fertilität und räumliche Mobilität. Comparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 37, 463–490.Google Scholar
  44. Huinink, J. & Röhler A. (2005). Liebe und Arbeit in Paarbeziehungen. Zur Erklärung geschlechtstypischer Arbeitsteilung in nichtehelichen und ehelichen Lebensgemeinschaften. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
  45. Huinink, J., & Schröder, T. (2008). Skizzen zu einer Theorie des Lebenslaufs. In A. Diekmann, K. Eichner, P. Schmidt, & T. Voss (Eds.), Rational choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate (pp. 291–309). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Catiglioni, L., & Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Framework and design of pairfam. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23, 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.4232/pairfam.5678.3.1.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kalter, F. (1994). Pendeln statt Migration. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 23, 460–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. KIT Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (2012). Das Deutsche Mobilitätspanel. http://mobilitaetspanel.ifv.uni-karlsruhe.de/de/index.html. Accessed 19 February 2015.
  52. Kley, S. (2010). Multilokalität als Strategie zur Nutzung von Chancen. In H.-G. Soeffner (Ed.), Unsichere Zeiten: Herausforderungen und gesellschaftliche Transformationen. VS Verlag. CD-Rom: Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  53. Kley, S. (2012). Gefährdet Pendelmobilität die Stabilität von Paarbeziehungen? Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 41, 356–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kley, S. (2016). Trennungsrisiko Pendelmobilität. Welche Paarbeziehungen sind gefährdet? Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 28(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kley, S., & Feldhaus, M. (2017). Effects of female commuting on partnership stability in suburban and other residential regions. Population, Space and Place, 24.  https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2093.
  56. Kofodimos, J. R. (1990). Why executives lose their balance. Organisational Dynamics, 19, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A. N., & Reich, M. (1995). Commuting stress. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior – Human resource research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewis, R.A. & Spanier, G.B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. Burr (Ed.) Contemporary Theories about the family (Vol1). New York, 268-294.Google Scholar
  60. Li, J., Johnson, S. E., Han, W.-J., Andrews, S., Kendall, G., Strazdins, L., & Dockery, A. (2014). Parents’ nonstandard work schedules and child well-being: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Primary Prevention, 35(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Limmer, R. (2005). Berufsmobilität und Familie in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 17, 8–26.Google Scholar
  62. Lück, D., & Schneider, N. F. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on mobility and family: Increasing job mobility – Changing family lives. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 22(2), 135–148.Google Scholar
  63. Lyons, G., & Chatterjee, K. (2008). A human perspective on the daily commute: Costs, benefits and trade-off. Transport Reviews, 28, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mayer, K. U. (1990). Lebensverläufe und sozialer Wandel – Anmerkungen zu einem Forschungsprogramm. In K. U. Mayer (Ed.), Lebensverläufe und sozialer Wandel (Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft) (Vol. 31, pp. 7–21).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McElwain, A., Korabik, K., & Rosin, H. M. (2005). An examination of gender differences in work-family conflict. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37(4), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McKenzie, B. (2013). Out-of-state and long commutes: 2011. U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/pdf/acs_20_out_of_state_and_long_commutes_r port.Pdf. Accessed 24 February 2015.
  67. Meil, G. (2010). Job mobility and family life. In N. F. Schneider & B. Collet (Eds.), Mobile living across Europe II (pp. 215–237). Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Michel, J. S., Mitchelson, J. K., Kotrba, L. M., LeBreton, J. M., & Baltes, B. B. (2009). A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miller, L. J. (1995). Family togetherness and the suburban ideal. Sociological Forum, 10(3), 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Noor, N. M. (2004). Work–family conflict, work- and family-role salience, and women’s well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). OECD better life index executive report. Retrieved from http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/media/bli/documents/BLI_executive_summary_2014.pdf
  72. Pausch, S., Reimann, M., Abendrot, A.-K., & Diewald, M. (2016). Work-life integration of dual-earner couples: Spillover, crossover, and accumulation of workplace demands and resources within partnership. Psychological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4(1), 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Piotrkowski, C. (1979). Work and the family system: A naturalistic study of the working-class and lower-middle- class families. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Reichl, C., Leiter, M. P., & Spinath, F. M. (2014). Work-nonwork conflict and burnout: A meta-analysis. Human Relations, 67(8), 979–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reinecke, J. (2014). Strukturgleichungsmodelle in den Sozialwissenschaften. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  78. Reuschke, D. (2010). Multilokales Wohnen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., & Dolan, P. (2011). “It's driving her mad”: Gender differences in the effects of commuting on psychological health. Journal of Health Economics, 30(5), 1064–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rüger, H. & Ruppenthal, S. (2010). Advantages and disadvantages of job-related spatial mobility. In N. F. Schneider & Collet, B. (Eds.): Mobile Living Across Europe II (pp 69-95). Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich publishers.Google Scholar
  81. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sandow, E. (2011). On the road. Social aspects of commuting long distances to work. Dissertation. Department of Social and Economic Geography.Google Scholar
  83. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schneider, N. F., Limmer, R., & Ruckdeschel, K. (2002). Mobil, flexibel, gebunden. Campus: Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  85. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: W.W. Noron & Company.Google Scholar
  86. Sirgy, M. J. (2018). The psychology of material well being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13, 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110, 339–366.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00542.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Turner, T., & Niemeier, D. (1997). Travel to work and household responsibility: New evidence. Transportation, 24, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies. Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang, M., Liu, S., Zhan, Y., & Shi, J. (2010). Daily work-family conflict and alcohol use: Testing the cross-level moderation effects of peer drinking norms and social support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wengler, A., Trappe, H., & Schmitt, C. (2008). Partnerschaftliche Arbeitsteilung und Elternschaft. Analysen zur Aufteilung von Hausarbeit und Elternaufgaben auf Basis des Generations and Gender Survey. Materialien zur Bevölkerungswissenschaft 127. Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  94. Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54, 557–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Westman, M. (2006). Crossover of stress and strain in the work-family context. In F. Jones, R. J. Burke, & M. Westman (Eds.), Work-life balance: A psychological perspective (pp. 163–184). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  96. Westman, M., Vinokur, A. D., Hamilton, V. L., & Roziner, I. (2004). Crossover of marital dissatisfaction during downsizing: A study of Russian Army officers and their spouses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wingerter, C. (2014). Berufspendler: Infrastruktur wichtiger als Benzinpreis. STATmagazin: Arbeitsmarkt, (5) 1–4. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/STATmagazin/Arbeitsmarkt/2014_05/2014_05PDF.pdf?blob=publicationFile. Accessed 15 September 2017.
  98. Zedeck, S. (1992). Introduction: Exploring the domain of work and family concerns. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Work, families and organizations (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social SciencesCarl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg Faculty IOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations