Advertisement

Organizational Support for Strengths Use, Work Engagement, and Contextual Performance: The Moderating Role of Age

  • Maria Christina MeyersEmail author
  • Dorien Kooij
  • Brigitte Kroon
  • Renee de Reuver
  • Marianne van Woerkom
Article

Abstract

Personal strengths are those characteristics that allow us to be at our best, that is, to deliver high performance while feeling happy and energized. Research has indicated that employees who perceive organizational support for strengths use (POSSU) display higher levels of well-being, and, in turn, performance. However, we do not yet know whether all employee groups benefit equally from the positive effects of POSSU. To fill this research gap, we introduce age as a relevant moderator that may alter the relationship between POSSU and respectively employee well-being (operationalized as work engagement in our study) and contextual performance (e.g., taking up new and challenging tasks). Building on life- and career stage theories, we expect that POSSU is more beneficial for younger employees who are still seeking to explore who they are and want to be (at work) and who are less able to use their strengths out of their own initiative. In a cross-sectional dataset of 753 Dutch employees, we found support for a moderated mediation model in which the indirect effect of POSSU on contextual performance via work engagement was moderated by age. Even though the indirect effect was significant for all age groups, it was found to be significantly stronger for younger employees. These findings highlight the relevance of focusing on individual strengths among younger employees who may be able to substantiate their tentative, positive (work) identities due to POSSU.

Keywords

Age Contextual performance Perceived organizational support for strengths use Strengths Work engagement 

Notes

References

  1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and company.Google Scholar
  6. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. The Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587–595.  https://doi.org/10.2307/255908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2011). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 51–64). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bindl, U., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 567–598). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21, 39–66.  https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouskila-Yam, O., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151–156.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CBS. (2015). Een op de zeven werknemers heeft burn-outklachten [One in seven employees have burnout-complaints]. Retrieved from https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2015/47/cbs-en-tno-een-op-de-zeven-werknemers-heeft-burn-outklachten. Accessed Dec 2017.
  17. CBS. (2016). Werkzame beroepsbevolking: vergrijzing SBI 2008; 2001–2014 [Working population: Ageing SBI 2008; 2001–2014). Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=80832NED&LA=NL. Accessed Dec 2017.
  18. CBS. (2017). Meer hoogopgeleiden in alle beroepsklassen [More highly educated people in all professions] Retrieved from https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2017/36/meer-hoogopgeleiden-in-alle-beroepsklassen. Accessed Dec 2017.
  19. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 308–323.  https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a "happy" worker is really a "productive" worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53, 182–199.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.53.3.182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 182–185.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: Employee work engagement and job performance. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (Vol. 65, pp. 147–163). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job-demands resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. The Academy of Management Review, 35, 285–293.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.Google Scholar
  28. Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finkelstein, L. M., Kulas, J. T., & Dages, K. D. (2003). Age differences in proactive newcomer socialization strategies in two populations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 473–502.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023400201387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 163–175). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.Google Scholar
  32. Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9380-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27, 22–38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 965–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kauppila, O.-P. (2014). So, what am I supposed to do? A multilevel examination of role clarity. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 737–763.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keenan, E. M., & Mostert, K. (2013). Perceived organisational support for strengths use: The factorial validity and reliability of a new scale in the banking industry. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v39i1.1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kluger, A. N., & Nir, D. (2010). The feedforward interview. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 235–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kooij, D. T. A. M., Jansen, P. G., Dikkers, J. S., & De Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1111–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, 331–337.  https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Ahearne, M. (1998). Some possible antecedents and consequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 62, 87–98.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1251745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 149–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Melchior, M., Caspi, A., Milne, B. J., Danese, A., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2007). Work stress precipitates depression and anxiety in young, working women and men. Psychological Medicine, 37, 1119–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707000414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neugarten, B. L. (1980). Middle age and aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677–718.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ornstein, S., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1989). Life stage versus career stage: A comparative test of the theories of Levinson and super. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 117–133.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030100203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paauwe, J., & Farndale, E. (2017). Strategy, HRM, and performance: A contextual approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Peterson, C. (2008). What is positive psychology, and what is it not? Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-good-life/200805/what-is-positive-psychology-and-what-is-it-not.
  55. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, S. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1145–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0. New York: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600–619.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015630930326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schulz, K., & Adams, G. (2007). Ageing and work in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N. (2015). Workaholism vs. work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9410-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (Vol. 23, pp. 3–25). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  68. Specht, J., Bleidorn, W., Denissen, J. J. A., Hennecke, M., Hutteman, R., Kandler, C., Luhmann, M., Orth, U., Reitz, A. K., & Zimmermann, J. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 28, 216–230.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Swanson, R. (2007). Analysis for improving performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations and documenting workplace expertise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  71. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36, 1117–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2011). Employee well-being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews., 14, 391–407.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00322.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Woerkom, M., Bakker, A. B., & Nishii, L. H. (2016a). Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van Woerkom, M., Mostert, K., Els, C., Bakker, A. B., de Beer, L., & Rothmann, S., Jr. (2016b). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 960–975.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1193010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright, J. D., & Hamilton, R. F. (1978). Work satisfaction and age: Some evidence for the ‘job change’ hypothesis. Social Forces, 56, 1140–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/56.4.1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Christina Meyers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dorien Kooij
    • 1
  • Brigitte Kroon
    • 1
  • Renee de Reuver
    • 1
  • Marianne van Woerkom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Resource StudiesTilburg UniversityTilburgthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations