Advertisement

Perceived Social Support and Big Five Personality Traits in Middle Adulthood: a 4-Year Cross-Lagged Path Analysis

  • Shagini Udayar
  • Ieva Urbanaviciute
  • Jérôme Rossier
Article

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the Big Five personality traits are significantly associated with perceived social support and these associations are positively associated with agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability. However, it is not yet clear whether these associations hold longitudinally or how these variables may predict each other over time. To investigate the co-development of personality traits and perceived social support, a cross-lagged path model design was used on a sample of adults (N = 1309) measured on two occasions 4 years apart. The results indicated that while emotional stability predicted perceived social support 4 years later, perceived social support also predicted emotional stability, extraversion, agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness 4 years later. Our findings suggest that perceived social support may be a resource that has an impact on the development of personality traits known to be associated with social skills as well as the quality and frequency of social interactions in middle adulthood.

Keywords

Personality traits Big five Perceived social support Middle adulthood 

Notes

Author’s Contribution

Authors’ contribution benefited from the support of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: Life course perspective, financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number: 51NF40–160,590).

References

  1. Aldridge, T. R., & Gore, J. S. (2016). Linking personality traits with well-being : The influence of primary social roles. Psychological Studies, 61, 233–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0370-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allemand, M., Schaffhuser, K., & Martin, M. (2015). Long-term correlated change between personality traits and perceived social support in middle adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Garcia, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005a). Invariance of the “NEO-PI-R” factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879–1889.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aluja, A., García, O., Rossier, J., & García, L. F. (2005b). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591–604.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleidorn, W., Klimstra, T. A., Denissen, J. J., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613498396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2016). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality. Advanced online publication, 86, 83–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branje, S., van Lieshout, C., & van Aken, M. (2005). Relations between agreeableness and perceived support in family relationships: Why nice people are not always supportive. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 29, 120–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadhead, W. E., Gehlbach, S. H., De Gruy, F. V., & Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire: Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 26(7), 709–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, E. C., D'Zurilla, T. J., & Sanna, L. J. (2009). Social problem solving as a mediator of the link between stress and psychological well-being in middle-adulthood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 33–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9155-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluation goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Church, T. A., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the big five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeYoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the big five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81, 465–475.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galdiolo, S., & Roskam, I. (2014). Development of personality traits in response to childbirth: A longitudinal dyadic perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gutierrez, J. L. G., Jimenez, B. M., Hernandez, E. G., & Puente, C. (2005). Personality and subjective well-being: Big five correlates and demographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1561–1569.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habashi, M. M., Graziano, W. G., & Hoover, A. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A big five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1177–1192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216652859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halamandaris, K., & Power, K. (1997). Individual differences, dysfunctional attitudes, and social support: A study of the psychosocial adjustment to university life of home students. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 93–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00175-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, P. L., Payne, B. R., Jackson, J. J., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Perceived social support predicts increased conscientiousness during older adulthood. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 543–547.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2016). Social investment in work reliably predicts change in conscientiousness and agreeableness: A direct replication and extension of Hudson, Roberts, and Lodi-Smith (2012). Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 12–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lachman, M. E. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of midlife development. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Lavy, S., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Boiman-Meshita, M. (2017). The wind beneath my wings: Effects of social support on daily strengths use at work. Journal of Career Assessment, 25, 703–714.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716665861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, C. Y. S., Goldstein, S. E., & Dik, B. J. (2017). The relational context of social support in young adults : Links with stress and well-being. Jounal of Adult Development. Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-017-9271-z.
  27. Lehnart, J., Neyer, F. J., & Eccles, J. (2010). Long-term effects of social investment: The case of partnering in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 78, 639–669.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00629.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin, N., Woelfel, M. W., & Light, S. C. (1985). The buffering effect of social support subsequent to an important life event. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 247–263.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2136756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.  https://doi.org/10.1037/A0019227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martínez Martí, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character strengths and well-being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German-speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, J., P.T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139-153). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neyer, F. J., Mund, M., Zimmermann, J., & Wrzus, C. (2014). Personality-relationship transactions revisited. Journal of Personality, 82, 539–550.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press and Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149–156.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pierce, G. R., Lakey, B., Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B., & Joseph, H. J. (1997). Personality and social support processes: A conceptual overview. In G. R. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. G. Sarason, & B. Sarason (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 3–18). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J.-P., Strippoli, M.-P. F., Glaus, J., Preisig, M., & Rossier, J. (2016). Individuals’ quality of life linked to major life events, perceived social support, and personality traits. Quality of Life Research, 25, 2897–2908.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1296-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prezza, M., & Pacilli, M. G. (2002). Perceived social support from significant others, family and friends and several socio-demographic characteristics. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 422–429.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.
  40. Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Smith, J. L. (2005). Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 166–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. StataCorp. (2015). Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  43. Swickert, R. (2009). Personality and social support. In P. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 524–540). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swickert, R., Rosentreter, C., Hittner, J., & Mushrush, J. (2002). Extraversion, social support processes, and stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 877–891.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00093-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swickert, R., Hittner, J. B., & Foster, A. (2010). Big five traits interact to predict perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 736–741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., Brant, L. J., & Costa, P. T. (2005). Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Psychology and Aging, 20, 493–506.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). Intra-individual change in personality stability and age. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 31–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145–161.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tong, E., Bishop, G., Diong, S., Enkelmann, H., Why, Y., Ang, J., et al. (2004). Social support and personality among male police officers in Singapore. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 109–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00072-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVESUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations