Character Strengths – Stability, Change, and Relationships with Well-Being Changes
- 55 Downloads
Character strengths are positively valued personality traits that are assumed to be stable across time and situations, but also malleable due to cultivation or deliberate intervention. Also, studies showed that character strengths are robustly related to well-being. Consequently, character strengths have often been used in interventions aimed at increasing well-being. However, the stability of character strengths and the longitudinal relationships with well-being are widely unexplored: First, previous reports on the stability of character strengths have mainly focused on one assessment instrument only and second, they did not consider other indicators of stability (and malleability) besides rank-order stability, (i.e., mean-level stability). In this longitudinal study, we assessed character strengths and well-being at two time points and examined the stability and malleability of character strengths and the convergence of changes in character strengths and well-being by means of correlation analyses. Two samples (n1 = 601, n2 = 1162) completed different measures of character strengths and instruments for the assessment of well-being, ill-being, and health within up to three and a half years. Results showed that character strengths are stable over longer time periods (test-retest reliabilities ranging from rtt = .60–.83) and that relationships between changes in strengths and well-being are highly parallel to what has been reported in cross-sectional studies (strongest relationships for zest, hope, curiosity, and love). Furthermore, results suggest that some strengths, most predominantly humor, but also spirituality and prudence might be more amenable for change than others. These results might bear important information for selecting character strengths in interventions.
KeywordsCharacter strengths Well-being Stability Malleability VIA-IS CSRF
This publication benefited from the support of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research “LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: Life course perspectives”, which is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number: 51NF40-160590). The authors are grateful to the Swiss National Science Foundation for its financial assistance. This study has been supported by research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant no. 100014_132512 and 100014_149772 awarded to WR and RP, and 100014_172723 awarded to WR). The authors would like to thank Sara Wellenzohn for her help with collecting part of the data.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest.
- Baumann, D., Ruch, W., Margelisch, K., Gander, F., & Wagner, L. (2018). Character strengths and life satisfaction in later life: An analysis of different living conditions. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
- Ghielen, S. T. S., Woerkom, M. van, & Meyers, M. C. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13, 573–585 https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164.
- Gillham, J., Adams-Deutsch, Z., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter-Heindl, V., Linkins, M., Winder, B., Peterson, C., Park, N., Abenavoli, R., Contero, A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.536773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg, D. P. (1978). Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hausler, M., Strecker, C., Huber, A., Brenner, M., Höge, T., & Höfer, S. (2017). Distinguishing relational aspects of character strengths with subjective and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01159.
- Hautzinger, M., & Bailer, M. (1993). Allgemeine Depresssionskala (ADS) [General Depression Scale]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2018). Character strengths and job satisfaction: Differential relationships across professions and adulthood. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
- Höfer, S., Gander, F., Höge, T., & Ruch, W. (2018). Editorial to the special issue „Character strengths, well-being, and health in educational and vocational settings”. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, J., Heintz, S., Pang, D., & Ruch, W. (2018). Differential relationships of light and darker forms of humor with mindfulness. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
- Huber, A., Strecker, C., Hausler, M., Kachel, M., Höge, T., & Höfer, S. (2018). Possession and applicability of signature character strengths: What is essential for well-being, work engagement, and burnout? Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
- Lavy, S. (2018). A review of character strengths interventions in 21st-century schools: Their importance and how they can be fostered. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
- Madden, W., Green, S., & Grant, A. M. (2011). A pilot study evaluating strengths-based coaching for primary school students: Enhancing engagement and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 6(1), 71–83.Google Scholar
- Maggiori, C., Rossier, J., Krings, F., Johnston, C. S., & Massoudi, K. (2016). Career pathways and professional transitions: Preliminary results from the first wave of a 7-year longitudinal study. In M. Oris, C. Roberts, D. Joye, & M. E. Stähli (Eds.), Surveying human vulnerabilities across the life course (pp. 131–157). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24157-9_6.
- Martínez-Martí, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character strengths and well-being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German-speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01253.
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill III (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 93–98). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Eades, J. F., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.594079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013a). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013b). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2015a). Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths- vs. a lesser strengths-intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00456.
- Proyer, R. T., Wellenzohn, S., Gander, F., & Ruch, W. (2015b). Toward a better understanding of what makes positive psychology interventions work: Predicting happiness and depression from the person × intervention fit in a follow-up after 3.5 years. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2017). The Authentic Happiness Inventory revisited: Addressing its psychometric properties, validity, and role in intervention studies. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 1, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-018-0006-0.
- Ruch, W., & Hofmann, J. (2017). Fostering humour. In C. Proctor (Ed.), Positive psychology interventions in practice (pp. 65–80). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51787-2_5.
- Ruch, W., & McGhee, P. (2014). Humor intervention programs. In A. C. Parks & S. M. Schueller (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 193–197). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Ruch, W., Huber, A., Beermann, U., & Proyer, R. T. (2007). Character strengths as predictors of the “good life” in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. In Romanian Academy, “George Barit“ Institute of History, Department of Social Research (Ed.), Studies and researches in social sciences (Vol. 16, pp. 123-131). Cluj-Napoca: Argonaut Press.Google Scholar
- Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruch, W., Gander, F., & Wellenzohn, S. (2012). German version of the general health questionnaire. Unpublished research instrument. Switzerland: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
- Ruch, W., Martínez-Martí, M. L., Proyer, R. T., & Harzer, C. (2014). The character strengths rating form (CSRF): Development and initial assessment of a 24-item rating scale to assess character strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruch, W., Hofmann, J., Rusch, S., et al. (2018). Training the sense of humor with the 7 Humor Habits Program and satisfaction with life. Humor, 31, 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0099.
- Schmitt, J. S., & Di Fabio, R. P. (2004). Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Udayar, S., Urbanaviciute, I., & Rossier, J. (2018). Perceived social support and Big Five personality traits in middle adulthood: A 4-year cross-lagged path analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar