Advertisement

Character Strengths and Life Satisfaction in Later Life: an Analysis of Different Living Conditions

  • Doris BaumannEmail author
  • Willibald Ruch
  • Katja Margelisch
  • Fabian Gander
  • Lisa Wagner
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the role of character strengths and their associations to life satisfaction in older people. We were interested in studying several transitions that are specific for older people: aging, retirement, living alone, and being widowed. We examined the relationships of these demographic characteristics and living conditions with character strengths and studied their effects on the association of character strengths with life satisfaction. In a cross-sectional analysis, 15,598 older adults (aged 46–93 years) who had completed measures on character strengths, life satisfaction, and demographic characteristics and living conditions were selected from an existing database. Overall, analyses revealed positive associations of most character strengths with age, and higher scores in most character strengths for the employed (vs. the retired) and those living with a partner (vs. those living alone), while only few relationships with being widowed (vs. being married) were observed. Further, the contribution of character strengths to life satisfaction generally decreased slightly with age, but increased for certain character strengths, such as modesty or prudence. Also, stronger relationships between several character strengths and life satisfaction were found for retired people and those living alone, while being widowed did not affect these relationships. The results demonstrate how character strengths might contribute to the life satisfaction of older adults in various living conditions and thereby offer a starting point for strengths-based programs in later life.

Keywords

Character strengths Life satisfaction Life course Positive psychology Middle and late adulthood Positive aging 

Notes

Funding

This study has been supported by a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant 100014_172723 awarded to WR).

Supplementary material

11482_2018_9689_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Baumann, D., & Eiroa-Orosa, F. J. (2016). Mental well-being in later life: The role of strengths use, meaning in life, and self-perceptions of ageing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 1, 21–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-017-0004-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, D., & Marecek, J. (2008). Dreaming the American dream: Individualism and positive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1767–1780.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00139.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Tang, Y., Arnold, S. E., & Wilson, R. S. (2006). The effect of social networks on the relation between Alzheimer’s disease pathology and level of cognitive function in old people: a longitudinal cohort study. The Lancet Neurology, 5, 406–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70417-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busch, H., & Hofer, J. (2012). Self-regulation and milestones of adult development: Intimacy and generativity. Developmental Psychology, 48, 282–293.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2013). Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 116–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.758305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383–409.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18, 563–589.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308093396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. B., & Koenig, H. G. (2003). Religion, religiosity and spirituality in the biopsychosocial model of health and ageing. Ageing International, 28, 215–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1005-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duffy, R. D., Torrey, C. L., England, J., & Tebbe, E. A. (2017). Calling in retirement: A mixed methods study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 399–413.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton (Originally published 1959).Google Scholar
  14. Forbes, M. K., Spence, K. M., Wuthrich, V. M., & Rapee, R. M. (2015). Mental health and wellbeing of older workers in Australia. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 202–213.  https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wav004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fratiglioni, L., Paillard-Borg, S., & Winblad, B. (2004). An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. Lancet Neurology, 3, 343–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00767-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fry, P. S. (2000). Religious involvement, spirituality and personal meaning for life: Existential predictors of psychological wellbeing in community-residing and institutional care elders. Aging & Mental Health, 4, 375–387.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713649965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gana, K., Bailly, N., Saada, Y., Joulain, M., & Alaphilippe, D. (2013). Does life satisfaction change in old age: Results from an 8-year longitudinal study. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 540–552.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill, S. C., Butterworth, P., Rodgers, B., Anstey, K. J., Villamil, E., & Melzer, D. (2006). Mental health and the timing of men’s retirement. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 515–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0064-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gwozdz, W., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2010). Ageing, health and life satisfaction of the oldest old: An analysis for Germany. Social Indicators Research, 97, 397–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9508-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, D. T., & Las Heras, M. (2013). Personal growth through career work. In K. S. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 507–518). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hammond, C. (2004). Impacts of lifelong learning upon emotional resilience, psychological and mental health: Fieldwork evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 30, 551–568.  https://doi.org/10.1080/030549804200030300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harzer, C. (2016). The eudaimonics of human strengths: The relations between character strengths and well-being. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 307–322). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heintz, S., Kramm, C., & Ruch, W. (2017). A meta-analysis of gender differences in character strengths and age, nation, and measure as moderators. The Journal of Positive Psychology. Advance online publication, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1414297.
  24. Höfer, S., Gander, F., Höge, T., & Ruch, W. (2019). Editorial to the special issue „Character strengths, well- being, and health in educational and vocational settings”. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
  25. Höge, T., Strecker, C., Hausler, M., Huber, A., & Höfer, S. (2019). Perceived socio-moral climate and the applicability of signature character strengths at work: a study among hospital physicians. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
  26. Huber, A., Strecker, C., Hausler, M., Kachel, T., Höge, T., & Höfer, S. (2019). Possession and applicability of signature character strengths: What is essential for well-being, work engagement, and burnout? Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
  27. Isaacowitz, D. M., Vaillant, G. E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Strengths and satisfaction across the adult lifespan. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57, 181–201.  https://doi.org/10.2190/61EJ-LDYR-Q55N-UT6E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jahoda, M. (1981). Work, employment, and unemployment: Values, theories, and approaches in social research. American Psychologist, 36, 184–191.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kashdan, T., & Steger, M. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 159–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing. A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, J. E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: A life-course, ecological model. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 212–222.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.P212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D., & Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin aging study. Psychology and Aging, 15, 511–526.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamers, S. M. A., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2013). Mental health and illness in relation to physical health across the lifespan. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Positive psychology: Advances in understanding adult motivation (pp. 19–33). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C., et al. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 341–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martínez-Martí, M., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character strengths and well-being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German-speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01253.
  38. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  39. McAdams, D. P. (2013). The positive psychology of adult generativity: Caring for the next generation and constructing a redemptive life. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Positive psychology: Advances in understanding adult motivation (pp. 191–205). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 494–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyers, C. M., Kooij, D., Kroon, B., de Reuver, R., & van Woerkom, M. (2019). Organizational support for strengths use, work engagement, and contextual performance: The moderating role of age. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
  42. Musick, M. A., Herzog, A. R., & House, J. S. (1999). Volunteering and mortality among older adults: Findings from a national sample. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54, 173–180.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.3.S173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2017). OECD better life index. Health. Retrieved from: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/health/. Accessed 18 Dec 2017.
  44. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paul, K. I., & Batinic, B. (2010). The need for work: Jahoda’s latent functions of employment in a representative sample of the German population. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 45–64.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pepin, G., & Deutscher, B. (2011). The lived experience of Australian retirees: ‘I’m retired, what do I do now? The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 419–426.  https://doi.org/10.4276/030802211X13153015305556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill III (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 93–98). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Pinquart, M. (2002). Creating and maintaining purpose in life in old age: a meta­analysis. Ageing International, 27, 90–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1004-2.
  50. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wyss, T., & Ruch, W. (2011). The relation of character strengths to past, present, and future life satisfaction among German-speaking women. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 370–384.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01060.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013a). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 222–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.777767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Proyer, R., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013b). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 275–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  54. Ruch, W., Huber, A., Beermann, U., & Proyer, R. T. (2007). Character strengths as predictors of the “good life” in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. In Romanian Academy, “George Barit“ Institute of History, Department of Social Research (Ed.), Studies and researches in social sciences (Vol. 16, pp. 123–131). Cluj-Napoca: Argonaut Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010a). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., & Weber, M. (2010b). Humor as character strength among the elderly: Theoretical considerations. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 43, 8–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-009-0090-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schnell, T. (2011). Individual differences in meaning­making: Considering the variety of sources of meaning, their density and diversity. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 667–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Edwards, L. M., Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Porsser, E. C., LaRue Walton, S., et al. (2003). Measuring and labeling the positive and the negative. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 21–39). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Strecker, C., Huber, A., Höge, T., Hausler, M., & Höfer, S. (2019). Identifying thriving workplaces in hospitals: Work characteristics and the applicability of character strengths at work. Applied Research in Quality of Life, accepted.Google Scholar
  62. Swan, G. E., & Carmelli, D. (1996). Curiosity and mortality in aging adults: A 5-year follow-up of the Western collaborative group study. Psychology and Aging, 11, 449–453.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.3.449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vaillant, G. E. (2004). Positive aging. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 561–577). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. van Solinge, H., & Henkens, K. (2008). Adjustment to and satisfaction with retirement: Two of a kind? Gerontologist, 45, 628–629.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Veenhoven, R. (2008). Healthy happiness: Effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 449–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9042-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wagner, L., Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2019). Character strengths and PERMA: Investigating the relationships of character strengths with a multidimensional framework of well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9695-z.
  67. Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55, 121–139.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-246X.00118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wenger, G. C., Davies, R., Shahtahmasebi, S., & Scott, A. (1996). Social isolation and loneliness in old age: Review and model refinement. Ageing and Society, 16, 333–358.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00003457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudaimonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: A ten year cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122, 213–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. A. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 890–905.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  72. World Health Organization. (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice (summary report) Geneva.Google Scholar
  73. World Health Organization (2006). Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization basic documents (45th ed.). Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf
  74. World Health Organization. (2011). Global health and aging. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health/en/
  75. Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Schulz, R. (2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doris Baumann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Willibald Ruch
    • 1
  • Katja Margelisch
    • 2
  • Fabian Gander
    • 1
  • Lisa Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Professorship for Personality and Assessment, Department of PsychologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Bern University of Teacher EducationBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations