Advertisement

Reflections on a Service User Perspective in Supporting Persons with Dual Diagnosis: the Case of Villa Voortman

  • Stijn Vandevelde
  • Freya Vander Laenen
  • Clara De RuysscherEmail author
  • Dirk Bryssinck
  • Jessica De Maeyer
  • Dirk Meesen
  • Eric Broekaert
Commentary
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Inclusive citizenship is an important concept in today’s mental health care. Still, persons with co-occurring substance use problems and psychiatric problems seem to fall through the cracks of existing (community) treatment services. At the same time, they are the persons least asked for their opinions as service users. This commentary sheds light on Villa Voortman, an innovative community-based outpatient treatment service for persons with dual diagnosis in Ghent (Belgium) that gives a central position to user perspectives in its daily practice.

Keywords

Dual diagnosis Service user perspective Community treatment 

References

  1. Bryssinck, D. (2013). Bemoeizorg tussen ethiek en pragmatiek. In C. Van Kerckhove, C. De Kock, & E. Vens (Eds.), Ethiek en zorg in de hulpverlening (pp. 71–89). Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bryssinck, D., Vandevelde, S., & Vanderplasschen, W. (2015). De ondersteuning van personen met een dubbele diagnose (psychose en drugproblemen) in Villa Voortman, een ontmoetingsplaats in de stad. In C. Wittouck, F. Vander Laenen, & K. Audenaert (Eds.), Handboek forensische gedragswetenschappen (pp. 303–329). Maklu: Antwerpen - Apeldoorn.Google Scholar
  3. Chorlton, E., Smith, I., & Jones, S. (2015). Understanding how people who use illicit drugs and alcohol experience relationships with psychiatric inpatient staff. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cruce, G., Öjehagen, A., & Nordström, M. (2012). Recovery-promoting care as experienced by persons with severe mental illness and substance misuse. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(5), 660–669.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, R., Heslop, P., Onyett, S., & Soteriou, T. (2014). Effective support for those who are “hard to engage”: a qualitative user-led study. Journal of Mental Health, 23, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake, R. E., Wallach, M. A., & McGovern, M. P. (2005). Future directions in preventing relapse to substance abuse among clients with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 56, 1297–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrelly, S., Brown, G., Rose, D., Doherty, E., Henderson, C., Birchwood, M., Marshall, M., Waheer, W., Szmukler, G., & Thornicroft, G. (2014). What service users with psychotic disorders want in a mental health crisis or relapse: thematic analysis of joint crisis plans. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 1609–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyde, B., Bowles, W., & Pawar, M. (2015). ‘We’re still in there’—consumer voices on mental health inpatient care: social work research highlighting lessons for recovery practice. British Journal of Social Work, 45(suppl.1), i62–i78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones, M. (1968). Beyond the therapeutic community: social learning and social psychiatry. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lister, R. (2007). Inclusive citizenship: realizing the potential. Citizenship Studies, 11, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Little, J., & Franskoviak, P. (2010). So glad you came! Harm reduction therapy in community settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 175–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Owczarzak, J., Dickson-Gomez, J., Convey, M., & Weeks, M. (2013). What is “support” in supportive housing: client and service providers’ perspectives. Human Organization, 72, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Priester, M. A., Browne, T., Iachini, A., Clone, S., DeHart, D., & Seay, K. D. (2016). Treatment access barriers and disparities among individuals with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders: an integrative literature review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 61, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pulford, J., Adams, P., & Sheridan, J. (2009). Client/clinician discrepancies in perceived problem improvement and the potential influence on dropout response. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rapoport, R. N. (1960). Community as doctor. New perspectives on a therapeutic community. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Staiger, P., Thomas, A., Ricciardelli, L., Mccabe, M., Cross, W., & Young, G. (2011). Improving services for individuals with a dual diagnosis: a qualitative study reporting on the views of service users. Addiction research & theory, 19, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trujols, J., Iraurgi, I., Oviedo-Joekes, E., & Guardia-Olmos, J. (2014). A critical analysis of user satisfaction surveys in addiction services: opioid maintenance treatment as a representative case study. Patient preference and Adherence, 8, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vander Laenen, F. (2009). I don’t trust you, you are going to tell’, adolescents with emotional and behavioural disorders participating in qualitative research. Child: Care, Health & Development, 35, 323–329.Google Scholar
  19. Vanderplasschen, W., Naert, J., Vander Laenen, F., & De Maeyer, J. (2015). Treatment satisfaction and quality of support in outpatient substitution treatment: opiate users’ experiences and perspectives. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 22, 272–280.Google Scholar
  20. Vandevelde, S., De Maeyer, J., De Ruysscher, C., Bryssinck, D., Meesen, D., Vanderstraeten, J., & Broekaert, E. (2015). Villa Voortman: carte blanche or not ? Therapeutic Communities, 36, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Velpry, L. (2008). The patient’s view: issues of theory and practice. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 3, 238–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ware, N. C., Hopper, K., Tugenberg, T., Dickey, B., & Fischer, D. (2007). Connectedness and citizenship: redefining social integration. Psychiatric Services, 58, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special Needs EducationGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social LawGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Psychiatric Centre Sleidinge, Villa VoortmanGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Faculty of Education, Health and Social WorkUniversity College GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations