Advertisement

Topology optimization of piezoelectric bi-material actuators with velocity feedback control

  • Mariana Moretti
  • Emílio C. N. SilvaEmail author
Open Access
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, the new technologies and discoveries on manufacturing materials have encouraged researchers to investigate the appearance of material properties that are not naturally available. Materials featuring a specific stiffness, or structures that combine non-structural and structural functions are applied in the aerospace, electronics and medical industry fields. Particularly, structures designed for dynamic actuation with reduced vibration response are the focus of this work. The bi-material and multifunctional concepts are considered for the design of a controlled piezoelectric actuator with vibration suppression by means of the topology optimization method (TOM). The bi-material piezoelectric actuator (BPEA) has its metallic host layer designed by the TOM, which defines the structural function, and the electric function is given by two piezo-ceramic layers that act as a sensor and an actuator coupled with a constant gain active velocity feedback control (AVFC). The AVFC, provided by the piezoelectric layers, affects the structural damping of the system through the velocity state variables readings in time domain. The dynamic equation analyzed throughout the optimization procedure is fully elaborated and implemented. The dynamic response for the rectangular four-noded finite element analysis is obtained by the Newmark’s time-integration method, which is applied to the physical and the adjoint systems, given that the adjoint formulation is needed for the sensitivity analysis. A gradient-based optimization method is applied to minimize the displacement energy output measured at a predefined degree-of-freedom of the BPEA when a transient mechanical load is applied. Results are obtained for different control gain values to evaluate their influence on the final topology.

Keywords

topology optimization method bi-material piezoactuator active velocity feedback control time-domain transient analysis host structure design vibration suppression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks CAPES (Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for the doctoral fellowship. The second author is pleased to acknowledge the support by CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) under grant 302658/2018-1 and CAPES project number A023-2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Ou J S, Kikuchi N. Integrated optimal structural and vibration control design. Structural Optimization, 1996, 12(4): 209–216Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibson R F, A review of recent research on mechanics of multifunctional composite materials and structures. Composite Structures, 2010, 92(12): 2793–2810Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang X, Li Y, Topology optimization to minimize the dynamic compliance of a bi-material plate in a thermal environment. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 47(3): 399–408MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang X, Kang Z, Topology optimization of piezoelectric layers in plates with active vibration control. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2014, 25(6): 697–712Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonçalves J F, De Leon D M, Perondi E A. Topology optimization of embedded piezoelectric actuators considering control spillover effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 388: 20–41Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang X, Kang Z, Li M, Topology optimization of electrode coverage of piezoelectric thin-walled structures with CGVF control for minimizing sound radiation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 50(5): 799–814MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao J, Wang C, Dynamic response topology optimization in the time domain using model reduction method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53(1): 101–114MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X, Kang Z. Dynamic topology optimization of piezoelectric structures with active control for reducing transient response. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 281: 200–219MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takezawa A, Makihara K, Kogiso N, et al, Layout optimization methodology of piezoelectric transducers in energy-recycling semiactive vibration control systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333(2): 327–344Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tzou H, Tseng C, Distributed piezoelectric sensor/actuator design for dynamic measurement/control of distributed parameter systems: A piezoelectric finite element approach. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1990, 138(1): 17–34Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang S, Quek S, Ang K, Vibration control of smart piezoelectric composite plates. Smart Materials and Structures, 2001, 10(4): 637–644Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caruso G, Galeani S, Menini L, Active vibration control of an elastic plate using multiple piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2003, 11(5–6): 403–419Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ray M, Reddy J, Optimal control of thin circular cylindrical laminated composite shells using active constrained layer damping treatment. Smart Materials and Structures, 2004, 13(1): 64–72Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vasques C M A, Dias Rodrigues J, Active vibration control of smart piezoelectric beams: Comparison of classical and optimal feedback control strategies. Computers & Structures, 2006, 84(22–23): 1402–1414Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim S M, Wang S, Brennan M J, Comparison of negative and positive position feedback control of a exible structure. Smart Materials and Structures, 2011, 20(1): 015011Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi S B, Kim H S, Park J S, Multi-mode vibration reduction of a CD-ROM drive base using a piezoelectric shunt circuit. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 300(1–2): 160–175Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chan K W, Liao W H. Precision positioning of hard disk drives using piezoelectric actuators with passive damping. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. Luoyang: IEEE, 2006, 1269–1274Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang S, Schmidt R, Qin X, Active vibration control of piezoelectric bonded smart structures using PID algorithm. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(1): 305–313Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruns T E, Tortorelli D A, Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(26–27): 3443–3459zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jensen J S, Nakshatrala P B, Tortorelli D A, On the consistency of adjoint sensitivity analysis for structural optimization of linear dynamic problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(5): 831–837MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moetakef M A, Lawrence K L, Joshi S P, et al, Closed-form expressions for higher order electroelastic tetrahedral elements. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(1): 136–142zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reddy J N. An Introduction to the Finite Element Method. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dong X, Ye L, Peng Z, et al, A study on controller structure interaction of piezoelectric smart structures based on finite element method. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2014, 25(12): 1401–1413Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tcherniak D, Topology optimization of resonating structures using simp method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002, 54(11): 1605–1622zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhao J, Wang C. Topology optimization for minimizing the maximum dynamic response in the time domain using aggregation functional method. Computers & Structures, 2017, 190: 41–60Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rozvany G, Aims, scope, methods, history and unified terminology of computer-aided topology optimization in structural mechanics. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(2): 90–108MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2003zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zargham S, Ward T A, Ramli R, et al, Topology optimization: A review for structural designs under vibration problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53(6): 1157–1177MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rozvany G I, A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 37(3): 217–237MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yin L, Ananthasuresh G, Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms with multiple materials using a peak function material interpolation scheme. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 23(1): 49–62Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Balamurugan V, Narayanan S, A piezolaminated composite degenerated shell finite element for active control of structures with distributed piezosensors and actuators. Smart Materials and Structures, 2008, 17(3): 035031Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations