Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Functional zoning and space management of Three-River-Source National Park

Abstract

Functional zoning is a key step for the integrated planning and scientific management of a national park. Selecting the Three-River-Source National Park (TNP) as the study area, this paper establishes an evaluation system including 13 evaluation indexes which are classified into four categories, namely: ecosystem services; potential distribution of key species habitats; ecological sensitivity; and ecological resilience through the comprehensive analysis on the regional eco-environmental features in the study area. The results of the comprehensive analysis, combined with the functions and requirements of management of national parks, indicate that TNP is divided into the first-level zone (the core conservation area, the ecological restoration area and the traditional utilization area) with definite targets of space management and the second-level zone with implementation of control measures. This method of functional zoning lays a solid foundation for the scientific planning of TNP; moreover, our study provides new insights into other national parks’ functional zoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allan R G, Pereira L S, Raes D et al., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper, No.56. FAO, 56.

  2. Anderson M G, 1999. Viability and spatial assessment of ecological communities in the Northern Appalachian Ecoregion (Doctoral dissertation). Durham: University of New Hampshire.

  3. Brown G, Weber D, 2011. Public participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(2): 1–1.

  4. Chen D, 2015. The enlightenment of Taiwan National Park on the construction management of the mainland na-ture reserve. China Forest Products Industry, 42(2): 5–58. (in Chinese)

  5. Chen L X, Fu B J, Zhao W W, 2006. Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(2): 5–1444. (in Chinese)

  6. Chen Y H, Huang D, Yan S Q, 2014. Discussions on public welfare, state dominance and scientificity of national park. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(2): 3–257. (in Chinese)

  7. Costa G C, Nogueira C, Machado R B et al., 2010. Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: A field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity & Conservation, 19(2): 3–883.

  8. Deng X, Li J M, Zeng H J et al., 2012. Research on computation methods of AHP weight vector and its applications. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 42(2): 7–93. (in Chinese)

  9. Dilsaver L M, 1994. America’s National Park System: The Critical Documents. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  10. Groves C R, Jensen D B, Valutis L L et al., 2002. Planning for biodiversity conservation: Putting conservation science into practice. Bioscience, 52(2): 6–499.

  11. Hirzel A H, Le L G, Helfer V et al., 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecological Modelling, 199: 142–152.

  12. Huang L L, Zhu Q, Chen T, 2007. Comparison of zoning models in protected natural areas overseas and its enlightenment. Tourism Tribune, 22(2): 3–18. (in Chinese)

  13. Hutchinson M F, Xu T B, 2013. ANUSPLIN Version 4.4 User Guide. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, the Australian National University, Canberra.

  14. Huyan J Q, Xiao J, Yu B et al., 2014. Research progress in function zoning of nature reserves in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 6391–6396. (in Chinese)

  15. Lai M, Wu S H, Dai E F et al., 2013. The indirect value of ecosystem services in the Three-River Headwaters Region. Journal of Natural Resources, 28(2): 1–38. (in Chinese)

  16. Li Y L, Zhu B L, Wang L et al., 2005. Designing and application of comprehensive index method based ecological environment quality comprehensive evaluation system. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 30(2): 1–89. (in Chinese)

  17. Margules C R, Pressey R L, 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405(2): 6783–243.

  18. Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (MWRC), 2008. Standards for Classification and Gradation of Soil Erosion SL 190–2007. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 3–12. (in Chinese)

  19. Myers N, 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(2): 6772–853.

  20. Nandy S, Singh C, Das K K et al., 2015. Environmental vulnerability assessment of eco-development zone of Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India. Ecological Indicators, 57: 182–195.

  21. National Park Service (NPS), 2009. General Management Planning Dynamic Sourcebook. Retrieved from https://parkplanning.nps.gov/files/GMPSourcebook/GMPSourcebook_Dec2009ver2.2.pdf.

  22. Price M F, 1983. Management planning in the sunshine area of Canada’s Banff National Park. Parks, 7: 6–10.

  23. Puhakka R, Saarinen J, 2013. New role of tourism in national park planning in Finland. Journal of Environment and Development, 22(2): 4–411.

  24. Qi Z X, Xu W H, Xiong X Y et al., 2011. Assessment of potential habitat for Ursusthibetanus in the Qinling Mountains. Biodiversity Science, 19(2): 3–343. (in Chinese)

  25. Scott D, Malcolm J R, Lemieux C, 2002. Climate change and modelled biome representation in Canada’s national park system: Implications for system planning and park mandates. Global Ecology Biogeography, 11: 475–484.

  26. Scott J M, Wright R G, 1993. Gap analysis: A geographical approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs, 57(2): 4–1.

  27. Tang F L, Wang M J, Li G Q, 2017. Discussion on zoning for national park function. Forestry Construction, 6: 1–7. (in Chinese)

  28. Wang W Z, 2000. National Park. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)

  29. Wei J, Guo Y M, Sun L et al., 2015. Evaluation of ecological environment vulnerability for Sanjiangyuan area. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34(2): 7–1968. (in Chinese)

  30. Xu H, 2013. Evolvement, system and characteristics of national park in Japan. World Forestry Research, 26(2): 6–69. (in Chinese)

  31. Zafar S M, Baig M A, Irfan M, 2011. Application of GIS/RS for management zoning of Margallah Hills National Park, Islamabad. International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, 2: 6–9.

  32. Zhou G S, Zheng Y Y, Chen S Q et al., 1998. NPP model of natural vegetation and its application in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 34(2): 5–2. (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Yanpeng Zhu.

Additional information

Foundation: National Key Research and Development Program of China, No.2017YFC0503806

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, M., Tian, J., Ren, Y. et al. Functional zoning and space management of Three-River-Source National Park. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 2069–2084 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1705-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • national parks
  • Three-River-Source National Park (TNP)
  • functional zoning
  • index system
  • space management