Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 1565–1577 | Cite as

Vegetation dynamics dominate the energy flux partitioning across typical ecosystem in the Heihe River Basin: Observation with numerical modeling

  • Pei WangEmail author
  • Xiaoyan Li
  • Yaqin Tong
  • Yongmei Huang
  • Xiaofan Yang
  • Xiuchen Wu
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Understanding the controls on seasonal variation of energy partitioning and separation between canopy and soil surface are important for qualifying the vegetation feedback to climate system. Using observed day-to-day variations of energy balance components including net radiation, sensible heat flux, latent heat flux ground heat flux, and meteorological variables combined with an energy-balanced two-source model, energy partitioning were investigated at six sites in Heihe River Basin from 2014 to 2016. Bowen ratio (β) among the six sites exhibited significant seasonal variations while showed smaller inter-annual fluctuations. All ecosystems exhibit a “U-shaped” pattern, characterized by smaller value of β in growing season, with a minimum value in July, and fluctuating day to day. During the growing season, average Bowen ratio was the highest for the alpine swamp meadow (0.60 ± 0.30), followed by the desert riparian forest Populus euphratica (0.47 ± 0.72), the alpine desert(0.46 ± 0.10), the Tamarix ramosissima desert riparian shrub ecosystem (0.33 ± 0.57), alpine meadow ecosystem (0.32 ± 0.17), and cropland ecosystem (0.27 ± 0.46). The agreement of Bowen ratio between simulated and observed values demonstrated that the two-source model is a promising tool for energy partitioning and separation between canopy and soil surface. The importance of biophysical control explains the convergence of seasonal and annual patterns of Bowen ratio for all ecosystems, and the changes in Bowen ratio showed divergence among varied ecosystems because of different physiological responses to energy flow pathways between canopy and soil surface.

Keywords

vegetation dynamics seasonal variations Bowen ratio two-source modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

11442_2019_1677_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (247 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 228 KB.

References

  1. Arora V, 2002. Modeling vegetation as a dynamic component in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and hydrological models. Reviews of Geophysics, 40(3): 3−1–3−26.Google Scholar
  2. Burakowski E, Tawfik A, Ouimette A et al., 2018. The role of surface roughness, albedo, and Bowen ratio on ecosystem energy balance in the eastern United States. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 249: 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapin et al., 2002. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng G, Li X, Zhao W et al., 2014. Integrated study of the water-ecosystem-economy in the Heihe River Basin. National Science Review, 1: 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Good S P, Noone D, Bowen G, 2015. Hydrologic connectivity constrains partitioning of global terrestrial water fluxes. Science, 349: 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammerle A, Haslwanter A, 2008. Leaf area controls on energy partitioning of a temperate mountain grassland. Biogeosciences, 5(2): 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jasechko S, Sharp Z D, Gibson J J et al., 2013. Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature, 496: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu S, Li X, Xu Z, et al., 2018. The Heihe Integrated Observatory Network: A basin-scale land surface processes observatory in China. Vadose Zone Journal, 17: 180072. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.04.0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu S, Xu Z, Wang W et al., 2011. A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15: 1291–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu S, Xu Z, Zhu Z et al., 2013. Measurements of evapotranspiration from eddy-covariance systems and large aperture scintillometers in the Hai River Basin, China. Journal of Hydrology, 487: 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maxwell R M, Condon L E, 2016. Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning. Science, 353: 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ning L, Zhan C, Luo Y et al., 2019. A review of fully coupled atmosphere-hydrology simulations. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(3): 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pan X, Liu Y B, Fan X W et al., 2017. Two energy balance closure approaches: Applications and comparisons over an oasis-desert ecotone. Journal of Arid Land, 9(1): 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shuttleworth W J, Wallace J, 1985. Evaporation from sparse crops: An energy combination theory. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 111: 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takle E S, 2015. Agricultural meteorology and climatology. Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, 25(680): 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang P, Li X Y, Huang Y M et al., 2016. Numerical modeling the isotopic composition of evapotranspiration in an arid artificial oasis cropland ecosystem with high-frequency water vapor isotope measurement. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 230/231: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang P, Li X Y, Wang L et al., 2018. Divergent evapotranspiration partition dynamics between shrubs and grasses in a shrub-encroached steppe ecosystem. New Phytologist, 219: 1325–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang P, Tsutomu Y, 2014. Application of a two-source model for partitioning evapotranspiration and assessing its controls in temperate grasslands in central Japan. Ecohydrology, 7: 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang P, Tsutomu Y, Li X Y et al., 2015. Partitioning evapotranspiration in a temperate grassland ecosystem: Numerical modeling with isotopic tracers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 208: 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang P, Yamanaka T, Li X Y et al., 2018. A multiple time scale modeling investigation of leaf water isotope enrichment in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Ecological Research, 33(5): 901–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Q, Yang W, Huang J et al., 2017. Shrub encroachment effect on the evapotranspiration and its component: A numerical simulation study of a shrub encroachment grassland in Nei Mongol, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41(3): 348–358. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Willmott C J, Ackleson S G, Davis R E et al., 1985. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(C5): 8995–9005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu Z, Liu S, Li X et al., 2013. Intercomparison of surface energy flux measurement systems used during the Hi-WATER-MUSOEXE. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118: 13140–13157.Google Scholar
  24. Zhang F Q, 2015. Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 92–97.Google Scholar
  25. Zhao P, Zhang, Li S et al., 2017. Vineyard energy partitioning between canopy and soil surface: dynamics and biophysical controls. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18(7): 1809–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pei Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaoyan Li
    • 1
  • Yaqin Tong
    • 1
  • Yongmei Huang
    • 1
  • Xiaofan Yang
    • 1
  • Xiuchen Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations