Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1381–1395 | Cite as

Evolution and driving forces of rural functions in urban agglomeration: A case study of the Chang-Zhu-Tan region

  • Xuelan Tan
  • Qiaoling Ouyang
  • Yue An
  • Shengyuan Mi
  • Lingxiao Jiang
  • Guohua ZhouEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

As the Rural Revitalization Strategy is gradually implemented, China’s rural areas are set to have more diverse function requirements. This paper selects the Chang-sha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan region (Chang-Zhu-Tan) consisting of 23 county-level units) as a case study and looks at its economic development, agricultural product supply, social security and ecological service functions during 1996–2016. It then constructs an index system to evaluate the temporal evolution of the region’s rural functions. SPSS 19.0 and DPS 7.05 software, as well as Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis, system clustering, optimal segmentation of ordered samples and other methods, are used to study the evolution traits, regional differentiation characteristics and driving forces of rural functions in the region. The results show, first of all, that the overall evolution trend is increasing in functions with periodic characteristics, the key nodes being 2000 and 2008. Second, there is clear geographical differentiation in the evolution of rural functions. The economic development function shows rapid growth in the urban agglomeration’s center and relatively weak growth at the periphery; the agricultural product supply function and ecological service function are concentrated in county-level units with abundant cultivated and forest land; and the social security function displays similar geographical differentiation to the economic development function. Overall, there is an obvious discrepancy in the degree of development of rural functions among county-level units of the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration; the rural functions of the agglomeration and peripheral county-level units have different development traits; and county-level units display functional differentiation. Third, rural functions have evolved as a result of interactions between various factors, such as natural resources, socio-economic conditions and local transport conditions. The new driving forces caused by urbanization are ultimately leading the evolution of rural functions toward multi-functional comprehensive development.

Keywords

rural functions sequential evolution regional differentiation driving forces rural revitalization Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fang Y G, Liu J S, 2015. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2): 257–270. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Hamblin A, 2009. Policy directions for agricultural land use in Australia and other post-industrial economies. Land Use Policy, 26(4): 1195–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. He Y H, Fan S G, Zhou G H et al., 2018. Evaluation of rural transformation development in Hunan Province based on major function oriented zoning. Progress in Geography, 37(5): 667–676. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holmes J, 2006. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(2): 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holmes J, 2012. Cape York Peninsula, Australia: A frontier region undergoing a multifunctional transition with indigenous engagement. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(3): 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hong H K, Liao H P, Li T et al., 2016. Analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of rural space function based on entropy value method and Dagum Gini coefficient. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(10): 240–248. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Li P X, Chen W, Sun W, 2014. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(6): 797–807. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Li Z, Zhang X L, Li H B et al., 2017. Research on rurality at village scale and rural development model: A case of Jintan City, Jiangsu Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(8): 1194–1202. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Liu Y, Liu Y S, 2012. Progress and prospect in the study of rural region multifunctions. China Population, Resources and Environment, 22(10): 164–169. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Liu Y, Liu Y S, Guo L Y, 2013. SOFM-based functional subareas of rural area along the Bohai Rim in China. Human Geography, 28(3): 114–120. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Liu Y S, Liu Y, Chen Y F, 2011. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(10): 1379–1389. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Z Q, Zhou A L, Lu Q, 2012. The transition of rural territorial leading function and the classification of rural development stages. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 26(4): 49–54. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Long H L, 2012. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 31(2): 131–138. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Long H L, Zhang X N, 2012. Progress in international rural geography research since the turn of the new millennium and some implications. Economic Geography, 32(8): 1–7, 135. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. McCann T, Cooper A, Rogers D et al., 2017. How hedge woody species diversity and habitat change is a function of land use history and recent management in a European agricultural landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 196: 692–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ondetti G, 2016. The social function of property, land rights and social welfare in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 50: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stola W, 1984. An attempt at a functional classification on rural areas in Poland: A methodological approach. Geographia Polonica, 50: 113–129.Google Scholar
  18. Tan X L, An Y, Su Y et al., 2018. Spatio-temporal dynamics of agricultural function in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomerations. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(5): 708–716. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Tan X L, Ouyang Q L, Yu S Y et al., 2017. Knowledge structure of rural function in China: An analysis based on Citespace map. Economic Geography, 37(10): 181–187. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Tan X L, Yu S Y, Ouyang Q L et al., 2017. Assessment and influencing factors of rural hollowing in the rapid urbanization region: A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Geographical Research, 36(4): 684–694. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Tang C L, He Y H, Zhou G H et al., 2014. The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(10): 1459–1472. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Tang C L, He Y H, Zhou G H et al., 2018. Optimizing the spatial organization of rural settlements based on life quality. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(5): 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Todorova S, Ikova J, 2014. Multifunctional agriculture: Social and ecological impacts on the organic farms in Bulgaria. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang Y N, Long H L, Ma L et al., 2018. Farmland function evolution in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain: Processes, patterns and mechanisms. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(6): 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhen L, Wei Y J, Xie G D, 2010. Regional analysis of dynamic land use functions in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(24): 6749–6761. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Zhou G H, Chen L, Tang C L et al., 2018. Research progress and prospects on Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Economic Geography, 38(6): 52–61. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuelan Tan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qiaoling Ouyang
    • 1
  • Yue An
    • 1
  • Shengyuan Mi
    • 1
  • Lingxiao Jiang
    • 1
  • Guohua Zhou
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentHunan Agricultural UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Department of Resources and Environment ScienceHunan Normal UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations