Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1245–1260 | Cite as

The evolution of the spatial-temporal patterns of global energy security since the 1990s

  • Qiang WangEmail author
  • Linglin Xu
  • Na Li
  • Xue Du
  • Shidai Wu
  • Lanlan Tian
  • Chenlu Wu
Article

Abstract

In this study, we developed an energy security evaluation model (ESEM) from three dimensions, energy supply-transport security, safety of energy utilization, and stability of political-socioeconomic environment, based on the integrated application of subjective and objective weight allocation technique. Then the spatial-temporal evolution of global energy security pattern and its driving mechanism was analyzed with the method above, and the results are shown as follows: (1) since the 1990s, the spatial patterns of global energy security have shown a deteriorating trend, with the growth of countries in at-risk type and relatively at-risk type. (2) The spatial distribution of countries with secure energy system shows a strong stability, and these countries are concentrated persistently in Western Europe and North America. The spatial evolution of countries with relatively secure energy system also presents a strong stability, which are mainly distributed in the periphery of the secure ones, namely Central and Southern Europe, South America and Eurasia, while countries with general energy system are mainly distributed in Asia, Africa and Southern Europe, and the spatial-temporal evolution of this type is the main cause for the deterioration of world energy security pattern. Countries with at-risk and relatively at-risk energy system are mainly concentrated in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Eurasia, rendering spatial extension to the east and south. (3) In the past 20 years, the mechanism for world’s energy security pattern formation gradually transforms from the ‘unitary dimension dominated’ to the ‘binary dimension-dominated’, and the main factors influencing the global energy security pattern become more diverse. (4) In the pattern of world’s energy security, China’s performance on energy security has been the global average since the 1990s, which shows a decreasing trend in safety of energy utilization dimension. Findings in this study can provide a reference for the government in terms of formulating strategic responses and policy options.

Keywords

energy security spatial-temporal evolution subjective-objective weight allocation method the globe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ang B W, Choong W L, Ng T S, 2015a. A framework for evaluating Singapore’s energy security. Applied Energy, 148: 314–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang B W, Choong W L, Ng T S, 2015b. Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42: 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC), 2007. A quest for energy decurity in the 21st century [R/OL], http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/file/2010/9/26/APL,RC_2007_A_Quest_for_energy_security.
  4. Badea A C, Tarantola S, Bolado R, 2011. Composite indicators for security of energy supply using ordered weighted averaging. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 6(6): 651–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bang G, 2010. Energy security and climate change concerns: Triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energy Policy, 38(4): 1645–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bielecki J, 2002. Energy security: Is the wolf at the door? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42: 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohi D R, Toman M A, 1996.The Economics of Energy Security. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown M A, Dworkin M, 2011. The environmental dimension of energy security. In: Sovacool B (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Energy Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cabalu H, 2010. Indicators of security of natural gas supply in Asia. Energy Policy, 38(1): 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chester L, 2010. Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature. Energy Policy, 38(2): 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chuang M C, Ma H W, 2013. An assessment of Taiwan’s energy policy using multidimensional energy security indicators. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorian J P, Franssen H T, Simbeck D R, 2006. Global challenges in energy. Energy Policy, 34(15): 1984–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghao C F, Liu G Y, Chen B, 2015. Advances in theories and methods of enemy forecasting and early warning. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(7): 2399–2413. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Gupta E, 2008. Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries. Energy Policy, 36(3): 1195–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helen C, 2010. Indicators of security of natural gas supply in Asia. Energy Policy, 38(1): 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill M, 1973. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2): 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Energy Agency (IEA), 1985. Energy Technology Policy. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
  18. Kisel E, Hamburg A, Härm M et al., 2016. Concept for energy security matrix. Energy Policy, 95: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kruyt B, van Vuuren D P, de Vries H J M et al., 2009. Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy, 37(6): 2166–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Coq C, Paltseva E, 2009. Measuring the security of external energy supply in the European Union. Energy Policy, 37(11): 4474–4481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesbirel S H, 2004. Diversification and energy security risks: The Japanese case. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 5(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu L, Shen L, Gao T et al., 2012a. Evaluation and spatial-temporal evolution of energy security in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(12): 1634–1644. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Liu L, Shen L, Liu X, 2012b. Theories, methods and progress of energy security research. Progress in Geography, 31(4): 403–411. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. McFalls M S, 1997. The role and assessment of classical market power in joint venture analysis. Antitrust Law Journal, 66: 651–735.Google Scholar
  25. Müller-Kraenner S, 2008. Energy Security: Re-measuring the World. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Narula K, 2013. Is sustainable energy security of India increasing or decreasing? International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 33: 1054–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Radovanović M, Filipović S, Pavlović D, 2017. Energy security measurement: A sustainable approach. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68: 1020–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sovacool B K, 2011. Evaluating energy security in the Asia pacific: Towards a more comprehensive approach. Energy Policy, 39(11): 7472–7479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sovacool M J P B K, 2012. The importance of scale to energy security. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 9(3): 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stirling A, 1994. Diversity and ignorance in electricity supply investment: Addressing the solution rather than the problem. Energy Policy, 22(3): 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. The World Bank. World Bank Open Data (WBOD). http://data.worldbank.org [accessed 15.04.2017].
  32. The World Bank. World Development Indicators (WDI). http://data.worldbank.org.cn/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, accessed 2017-04-20.
  33. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). International Energy Statistics. http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm, accessed 2017-04-10.
  34. Vivoda V, 2010. Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach. Energy Policy, 38(9): 5258–5263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H Y, 2013. Changes in world energy pattern and their influence on China’s energy security. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Sciences), 30(6): 1–11. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. Wang Q, Zheng Y, Wu S D et al., 2011. Mechanism of energy efficiency response to industrial restructuring and energy consumption structure change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(6): 741–749. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. World Energy Council (WEC), 2013. Energy Sustainability Index [Data File]. http://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2013-Energy-Sustainability-Index-VOL-2, accessed 2017-08-20.
  38. Yang Y, Liu Y, Jin F J, 2013. Distribution of world oil refining capacity and its evolution based on different regional scales. Word Regional Studies, 22(3): 1–9. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Yang Y, Liu Y, 2013. Progress and prospect of world energy geography in China. Progress in Geography, 32(5): 818–830. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Yergin D, 2005. Energy security and markets. In: Kalicki J H, Goldwyn D L (eds.). Energy and Security: Toward a New Foreign Policy Strategy. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Press.Google Scholar
  41. Yu J, Wang X Q, Zhang L, 2014. 2AST Conceptual framework and integrated evaluation of energy security. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 14(3): 70–77. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. Zhang L, 2004. Mineral Resources Exploitation and National Industrialization. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Zhang Y Y, Guan Q Y, 2007. World energy patterns and energy security of China. World Economy, (9): 17–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Springer-Verlag 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiang Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Linglin Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Na Li
    • 3
  • Xue Du
    • 4
  • Shidai Wu
    • 1
    • 5
  • Lanlan Tian
    • 1
  • Chenlu Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geographical ScienceFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada
  3. 3.Collage of Finance and EconomicsJimei UniversityXiamenChina
  4. 4.Jilin Province City & Town Planning & Designing InstituteChangchunChina
  5. 5.College of TourismFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations