Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 803–817 | Cite as

Simulating land use for protecting food crop areas in northeast Thailand using GIS and Dyna-CLUE

  • Kanda Sakayarote
  • Rajendra P. ShresthaEmail author


Land use in the northeast region of Thailand has changed dramatically in the past two decades. These changes are mainly due to the government policies, which launched a scheme to promote rubber plantation during 2003–2013 targeting to solve the problem of poverty in the region. At least 50,000 ha of paddy fields were found to be converted to other land use types between 2002 and 2012. This study was conducted in Nong Khai and Bueng Kan province of northeast Thailand, where massive rubber plantation is going on prompting significant amount of land-use change, with the objective of investigating how land-use changes will affect on food availability in future. We analyzed land-use changes of the past and simulated future land uses using GIS and Landsat Thematic Mapper Data. The most obvious change was the decrease in paddy field and an increase in rubber plantation. This eventually leads to decreased paddy production affecting food supply of farm households. The land use projections for 2032 were done for three scenarios using Dyna-CLUE model. Unlike business as usual scenario, which will further decrease the paddy area, other scenarios with different land use policies if implemented will help protect paddy areas and thus achieving higher food production locally. The lack of implementation of proper spatial policies will lead to a further loss of paddy areas at macro level. The smallholder farmers may be highly vulnerable to land use-change and experience significant food crop losses, food insecurity and income loss when they change the land to rubber and there is market failure.


land-use change rubber plantation scenarios Dyna-CLUE northeast Thailand 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors greatly acknowledge the financial support and assistance provided by the Agricultural Land Reform Office, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives of Thailand and the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) to the first author. The Land Development Department (LDD), Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), Office of the Rubber Replanting Aid Fund (ORRAF), and Nong Khai Rubber Research Center (NRRC), who helped by providing data and needed facilitation, are also acknowledged. Sincere appreciation is extended to farmers of the study area for their unreserved support. Thanks are also due to the anonymous reviewers and editors whose comments were very useful to improve the manuscript.


  1. Ahmed F F, 2012. Income diversification determinants among farming households in Konduga, Borno State, Nigeria. Academic Research International, 2(2): 555–561.Google Scholar
  2. Fox J, Castella J C, 2013. Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Mainland Southeast Asia: What are the prospects for smallholders? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(1): 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Isvilanonda S, Bunyasiri I, 2009. Food security in Thailand: Status, rural poor vulnerability, and some policy options. ARE Working Paper No.2552/1. Department of Agricultural and Resource.Google Scholar
  4. Ivanic M, Martin W, 2008. Implications of higher global food prices for poverty in low-income countries. Available at SSRN 1149097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kroeksakul P, Naipinit A, Sakolnakorn T P N, 2011. The economic and social effects of farmers growing para rubber in northeast Thailand: A case study of Sapsomboon village, Dun Sad sub-district, Kranoun district, Khon Kaen province. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 7(1): 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9): 3465–3472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Li Z, Fox J M, 2011. Rubber tree distribution mapping in Northeast Thailand. International Journal of Geosciences, 2(4): 573–584. Scholar
  8. Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), 2013. Agriculture statistics of Thailand 2013. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  9. Partoyo Shrestha R P, 2013. Monitoring farmland loss and projecting the future land use of an urbanized watershed in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Land Use Science, 8(1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pontius R G, Schneider L C, 2001. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85(1): 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pontius Jr R G, Boersma W, Castella J C et al., 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(1): 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rubber Authority of Thailand, 2010. Central Market Daily Rubber Price Report by the Rubber Economic Research and Development., accessed 15 March 2016.
  13. Sakayarote K, Shrestha R P, 2017. Policy-driven rubber plantation and its driving factors: A case of smallholders in northeast Thailand. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(1): 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schneider U A, Havlík P, Schmid E et al., 2011. Impacts of population growth, economic development, and technical change on global food production and consumption. Agricultural Systems, 104(2): 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thongmanivong S, Fujita Y, 2006. Recent land use and livelihood transitions in northern Laos. Mountain Research and Development, 26(3): 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thongyou M, 2014. Rubber cash crop and changes in livelihoods strategies in a village in Northeastern Thailand. Asian Social Science, 10(13): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A et al., 2002. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management, 30(3): 391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Viswanathan P, 2008. Emerging smallholder rubber farming systems in India and Thailand: A comparative economic analysis. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 5(2): 2.Google Scholar
  19. Wang J, Chen Y, Shao X et al., 2012. Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: Present, trend and future. Land Use Policy, 29: 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wannasai N, Shrestha R P, 2008. Role of land tenure security and farm household characteristics on land use change in the Prasae Watershed, Thailand. Land Use Policy, 25(2): 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Springer-Verlag 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Land Reform OfficeBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations