Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 762–778 | Cite as

Practice of barren hilly land consolidation and its impact: A typical case study from Fuping County, Hebei Province of China

  • Yifan Wu
  • Weilun Feng
  • Yang ZhouEmail author


Land is the root of rural revitalization, and its core is to reinvigorate land resources through the building up of land capacity. Since the late 1990s, land consolidation efforts have been widely extended to all parts of China. Land consolidation has served as an essential instrument for reinvigorating stock land, strengthening intensive land use, timely supplementing cultivated land, and promoting agricultural modernization, as well as urban-rural integration. This study uses a typical poor village (Dadao Village) in a state-designated impoverished county (Fuping County, Hebei Province), to analyze the socioeconomic benefits and eco-environmental impacts of land consolidation. With the aid of first-hand data from questionnaire surveys, face-to-face interviews and the visual interpretation of land use and land cover changes (LUCC), we found that: 1) the barren hilly land consolidation (BHLC) helps to promote the transformation of resource-advantages into asset-advantages in poverty-stricken areas. In 2017, 60.16% households in the study area gained the additional transferred-income with an annual average of 2843 yuan, while 19.11% households received the wage-income with an annual average of 9871 yuan. 2) Land consolidation inspires farmers’ enthusiasm to participate in village government and helps alleviate rural poverty. From 2014 to 2017, land consolidation has helped 585 poor in the village out of poverty. Meanwhile, by land consolidation, most farmers’ attitudes towards land consolidation have shifted from “not caring” to “have great concern,” and their identity cognition has gradually changed from being bystanders to becoming decision makers and supervisors. 3) Further analysis demonstrated that land consolidation could not only increase the quantity and quality of arable land, but also have a certain impact on eco-environment. During 2014–2016, the BHLC in the study area transformed 242.12 ha unused barren hilly land and open forest land into well-facilitated arable land, and increased the average arable land by 0.19 ha per capita. Also, the index of land use intensity increased by 27.01% between 2014 and 2016. Farmers’ perceptions of environmental awareness have confirmed that such high-intensity LUCC were significant enough to make two-side impacts on eco-environment. We appeal to establish a combined organization and encouragement mechanism of rural land consolidation, to take the full breadth and depth of farmers’ participation into consideration, and to formulate more scientific and sustainable land consolidation planning. Also, we put forward some suggestions and notes for the implementation and promotion of BHLC model. These findings can provide beneficial references for those involved in policymaking and planning in the areas of land consolidation and poverty alleviation in China, as well as other developing countries around the world.


land consolidation engineering barren hilly land socioeconomic effect rural revitalization China 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adrianna K, Michal L, Robert H et al., 2014. Public perceptions of rural landscapes in land consolidation procedures in Poland. Land Use Policy, 33: 313–319.Google Scholar
  2. Cay T, Ayten T, Iscan F, 2010. Effects of different land reallocation models on the success of land consolidation projects: Social and economic approaches. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y, Liu Y, Yang R, 2012. Identification of China’s suitable regions for rural residential land consolidation based on livelihoods transformation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(3): 420–427. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Czaja R, Blair J, 2005. Designing Surveys: A Guide to Decisions and Procedures. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demetriou D, Stillwell J, See L, 2012. Land consolidation in Cyprus: Why is an integrated planning and decision support system required? Land Use Policy, 29: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du X, Zhang X, Jin X, 2018. Assessing the effectiveness of land consolidation for improving agricultural productivity in China. Land Use Policy, 70: 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han J, Liu Y, Zhang Y, 2015. Sand stabilization effect of feldspathic sandstone during the fallow period in Mu Us Sandy Land. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(4): 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hiironen J, Riekkinen K, 2016. Agricultural impacts and profitability of land consolidations. Land Use Policy, 55: 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang H, Wu C, Zhang S, 2012. Benefits analysis and evaluation on land consolidation planning in Heilongjiang Province. Transactions of the CSAE, 28(6): 240–246. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Huang J, Cui S, Li F et al., 2011. The sensitivity of Xiamen’s three industrial sectors to land use changes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(14): 3863–3871. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Janus J, Markuszewska I, 2017. Land consolidation: A great need to improve effectiveness: A case study from Poland. Land Use Policy, 65: 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang G, Wang X, Yun W et al., 2015. A new system will lead to an optimal path of land consolidation spatial management in China. Land use Policy, 42: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li S, Chen Y, Zhang C et al., 2014. Study on evaluation progress model in the implementation of land consolidation projects based on multi-temporal high-resolution remote sensing data. China Land Science, 28(3): 83–88. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Li Y, Cao Z, Zheng X et al., 2016. Regional and sustainable approach for target-poverty alleviation and development of China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 31(3): 279–288. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Li Y, Fan P, Cao Z et al., 2017. Sand-fixation effect and micro-mechanism of remixing soil by Pisha sandstone and sand in the Mu Us Sandy Land, China. Journal of Dessert Research, 37(3): 421–430. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Li Y, Zhao G, Wang A et al., 2006. Evaluation index system for land consolidation benefit and its application. Transactions of the CSAE, 22(10): 98–101. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Liu Y, 2018. Research on the urban–rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4): 637–650. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Liu Y, Fang F, Li Y, 2014. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy, 40: 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Y, Guo Y, Li Y, 2015. GIS-based effect assessment of soil erosion before and after gully land consolidation: A case study of Wangjiagou project region, Loess Plateau. Chinese Geographical Science, 25(2): 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Li Y, 2017a. Revitalize the world’s countryside. Nature, 548(7667): 275–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y, Li Y, 2017b. Engineering philosophy and design scheme of gully land consolidation in Loess Plateau. Transactions of the CSAE, 33(10): 1–9. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Liu Y, Long H, Chen Y et al., 2016. Progress of research on urban-rural transformation and rural development in China in the past decade and future prospects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): 1117–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Y, Wang J, Deng X, 2008. Rocky land desertification and its driving forces in the karst areas of rural Guangxi, Southwest China. Journal of Mountain Science, 5(4): 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Y, Wang J, Long H, 2010. Analysis of arable land loss and its impact on rural sustainability in Southern Jiangsu Province of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3): 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zhou Y, 2018. Efficiency of construction land allocation in China: An econometric analysis of panel data. Land Use Policy, 74: 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Z, Müller M, Rommel J et al., 2016. Community-based agricultural land consolidation and local elites: Survey evidence from China. Journal of Rural Studies, 47: 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long H, Tu S, 2017. Rural restructuring: theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(4): 563–576. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Long H, Liu Y, Li X, 2010. Building new countryside in China: A geographical perspective. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Long H, Zhang Y, Tu S, 2018. Land consolidation and rural revitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(10): 1837–1849. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Luo M, Zhou T, Zhang L, 2013. A comparative study on public participation in land consolidation between China and Germany. China Land, (5): 59–61. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Niels O, 2015. Agreement based land consolidation: In perspective of new modes of governance. Land use policy, 46: 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pašakarnis G, Maliene V, 2010. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe: Applying land consolidation. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pia J, Rasmus E, Brian K et al., 2018. Pursuing collective impact: A novel indicator-based approach to assessment of shared measurements when planning for multifunctional land consolidation. Land Use Policy, 73: 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sayılan H, 2014. Importance of land consolidation in the sustainable use of Turkey’s rural land resources. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120: 248–256.Google Scholar
  35. Shao Z, 2012. The method for determining sample size in a sample survey. Statistics and Decision, (22): 12–14. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. Shi L, Cui S, Yin K et al., 2010. The impact of land use/cover change on ecosystem service in Xiamen. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(6): 708–714. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Small M L, 2009. ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu W, Zang S, Wu C et al., 2011. Analyzing and modeling land use land cover change (LUCC) in the Daqing city, China. Applied Geography, 31(2): 600–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang J, Yan S, Guo Y et al., 2015. The effects of land consolidation on the ecological connectivity based on ecosystem service value: A case study of Da’an land consolidation project in Jilin province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(5): 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Y, Liu Y, 2018. Pollution and restructuring strategies of rural ecological environment in China. Progress in Geography, 37(5): 710–717. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang Y, Liu Y, Li Y et al., 2016. The spatio-temporal patterns of urban-rural development transformation in China since 1990. Habitat International, 53: 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu C, Fei L, Ye Y, 2011. The theoretical perspective, rational paradigm and strategic solution of land consolidation. Economic Geography, 31(10): 1718–1722. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Yan J, Xia F, Ma M, 2016. Strategy orientations of transformation development: Land consolidation in the new period of China. China Land Science, 30(2): 3–10. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Yang J, Wang Z, Jin G et al., 2013. Post-benefit evaluation of land consolidation project implementation based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Recourse and environment in Yangtze Basin, 22(8): 1036–1042. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Yun W, 2011. Introduction on Land Consolidation Planning. Beijing: Geology Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. Zhang R, Gao Y, 2017. Classification of comprehensive benefits of land consolidation in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region based on grey relational analysis. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 38(5): 31–40. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  47. Zhou Y, Guo Y, Liu Y et al., 2018. Targeted poverty alleviation and land policy innovation: Some practice and policy implications from China. Land Use Policy, 74: 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Springer-Verlag 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Geographical ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchCASBeijingChina
  3. 3.Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty AlleviationCASBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations