Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 417–431 | Cite as

Evolutionary dynamics of the main-stem longitudinal profiles of ten kongdui basins within Inner Mongolia, China

  • Zhenkui Gu
  • Changxing ShiEmail author
  • Jie Peng


The longitudinal profiles of main streams of ten kongdui basins within Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region of China were characterized in this study by analyzing a series of quantitative indexes that are relevant to tectonic activity and river action, and by establishing a series of multiple regression models. The results reveal that all longitudinal profiles are concave in shape, with a range of concavity between 1.1 and 3.1, increasing from west to east. Data also show that the concavity of the profiles is significantly negatively correlated with profile length, altitude difference, average altitude, drainage area and sediment load of the basins. Analysis reveals that kongdui basins have suffered from moderate-to-weak tectonic activity over time, again characterized by a west-to-east weakening trend. Stream power also varies along the main channels of the ten kongdui basins; average values in each case fall between 0.8 W/m and 8.4 W/m, generally higher within the middle reaches. This decreasing trend in stream power within the lower reaches of kongdui basins might provide one key explanation for sedimentation there. Data also show that the average stream power in western and central basins tends to be higher than that in eastern examples, even though both the highest and the lowest values are seen within two middle ones. This analysis shows that the longitudinal profile concavity values are mainly controlled by tectonic activity and that the effect of river action is insignificant.


longitudinal profiles concavity tectonic activity stream power multiple regression models 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altın T B, 2012. Geomorphic signatures of active tectonic in drainage basins in the southern Bolkar Mountains, Turkey. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 40(2): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambili V, Narayana A C, 2014. Tectonic effects on the longitudinal profiles of the Chaliyar River and its tributaries, southwest India. Geomorphology, 217(2): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergonse R, Reis E, 2015. Reconstructing pre-erosion topography using spatial interpolation techniques: A validation-based approach. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(2): 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookfield M E, 2008. The evolution of the great river systems of southern Asia during the Cenozoic India-Asia collision: Rivers draining north from the Pamir syntaxis. Geomorphology, 22(3/4): 285–312.Google Scholar
  5. Chen Y C, Sung Q C, Cheng K Y, 2003. Along strike variations of morphotectonic features in the western foothills of Taiwan: Tectonic implications based on stream-gradient and hypsometric analysis. Geomorphology, 22(1/2): 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng Q D, Cheng S P, Min W et al., 1999. Discussion on Cenozoic tectonics and dynamics of the Ordos Block. Journal of Geomechanics, 5(3): 13–19. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Dušan B, Ján B, Daniel K et al., 2017. Morphometric and geological conditions for sediment accumulation in the Udava River, Outer Carpathians, Slovakia. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(8): 981–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Font M, Amorese D, Lagarde J L, 2010. DEM and GIS analysis of the stream gradient index to evaluate effects of tectonics: The Normandy intraplate area (NW France). Geomorphology, 119(3):172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallen S F, Wegmann K W, 2017. River profile response to normal fault growth and linkage: An example from the Hellenic forearc of south-central Crete, Greece. Earth Surface Dynamics, 5(1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao M, Zeilinger G, Xu X et al., 2016. Active tectonics evaluation from geomorphic indices for the central and the southern Longmenshan range on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Tectonics, 35: 1812–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hack J T, 1973. Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index. Journal of Research of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1: 421–429.Google Scholar
  12. Hamdouni R E, Irigaray C, Fernández T et al., 2008. Assessment of relative active tectonics, southwest border of Sierra Nevada (Southern Spain). Geomorphology, 96: 150–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu X F, Pan B T, Kirby E et al., 2010. Spatial differences in rock uplift rates inferred from channel steepness indices along the northern flank of the Qilian Mountain, northeast Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(27/28): 3205–3214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu X F, Pan B T, Li Q, 2014. Principles of the stream power erosion model and the latest progress in research. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 50(6): 824–831. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Jiang Z X, 1987. Model of development and rule of evolution of the longitudinal profiles of the valley of the Three Rivers in the northwestern part of Yunnan Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 42(1): 16–26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Langbein W B, 1964. Profiles of rivers of uniform discharge. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 501B: 119–122.Google Scholar
  17. Lin X Z, Guo Y, Hou S Z, 2014. Estimation of sediment discharge of ten tributaries of the Yellow River in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Sediment Research, 2: 15–20. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Mahmood S A, Gloaguen R, 2012. Appraisal of active tectonics in Hindu Kush: Insights from DEM derived geomorphic indices and drainage analysis. Geoscience Frontiers, 3(4): 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marple R T, Talwani P, 1993. Evidence of possible tectonic unwarping along the South Carolina coastal plain from an examination of river morphology and elevation data. Geology, 21(7): 651–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merritts D, Vincent K R, 1989. Geomorphic response of coastal streams to low, intermediate, and high rates of uplift, Mendocino triple junction region, northern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110(11): 1373–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller S R, Sak P B, Kirby E et al., 2013. Neogene rejuvenation of central Appalachian topography: Evidence for differential rock uplift from stream profiles and erosion rates. Earth & Planetary Sciences Letters, 369(3): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohmori H, 1991. Change in the mathematical function type describing the longitudinal profile of a river through an evolutionary process. Journal of Geology, 99: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Owono F M, Ntamak-Nida M J, Dauteuil O et al., 2016. Morphology and long-term landscape evolution of the South African plateau in South Namibia. Catena, 142: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pan B T, Li Q, Hu X F et al., 2015. Bedrock channels response to differential rock uplift in eastern Qilian Mountain along the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 100: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pérez-Peña J V, Azañón J M, Azor A et al., 2010. Spatial analysis of stream power using GIS: SLk anomaly maps. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 34(1): 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips J D, Lutz J D, 2008. Profile convexities in bedrock and alluvial streams. Geomorphology, 102(3): 554–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pipaud I, Loibl D, Lehmkuhl F, 2015. Evaluation of TanDEM-X elevation data for geomorphological mapping and interpretation in high mountain environments: A case study from SE Tibet, China. Geomorphology, 246: 232–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rãdoane M, Rãdoane N, Dan D, 2003. Geomorphological evolution of longitudinal river profiles in the Carpathians. Geomorphology, 50(4): 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhea S, 1989. Evidence of uplift near Charleston, South Carolina. Geology, 17(4): 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snow R S, Slingerland R L, 1987. Mathematical modeling of graded river profiles. Journal of Geology, 95(1): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Summerfield M A, 1991. Global Geomorphology. Longman: Singapore.Google Scholar
  32. Wang H Z, 1985. Atlas of the Palaeo-Geography of China. Beijing: Sinomap Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Wang Q S, Teng J W, An Y L et al., 2010. Gravity field and deep crustal structures of the Yinshan Orogen and the northern Ordos Basin. Progress in Geophysics, 25(5): 1590–1598. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Whipple K X, Hancock G S, Anderson R S, 2000. River incision into bedrock: Mechanics and relative efficacy of plucking, abrasion, and cavitation. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 112(3): 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whipple K X, Tucker G E, 1999. Dynamics of the stream power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(B8): 17661–17674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu J X, 2013. Erosion and sediment yield of ten small tributaries joining Inner Mongolia reach of upper Yellow River in relation to coupled wind-water processes and hyper-concentrated flows. Journal of Sediment Research, (6): 27–36. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Xu J X, 2014. Temporal and spatial variations in erosion and sediment yield and the cause in the ten small tributaries to the Inner Mongolia Reach of the Yellow River. Journal of Desert Research, 34(6): 1641–1649. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Yang M, Li L, Zhou J et al., 2015. Mesozoic structural evolution of the Hangjinqi area in the northern Ordos Basin, North China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 66: 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yao H, Shi C, Shao W, 2016. Changes and influencing factors of the sediment load in the Xiliugou basin of the upper Yellow River, China. Catena, 142: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu H Y, Luo L, Ma H H et al., 2017. Application appraisal in catchment hydrological analysis based on SRTM 1 Arc-second DEM. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 29(2): 138–143. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. Yue L P, Li J X, Zheng G Z et al., 2007. Evolution of the Ordos Plateau and environmental effects. Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 50(Suppl.2): 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Y Q, Teng J W, Wang F Y et al., 2011. Structure of the seismic wave property and lithology deduction of the upper crust beneath the Yinshan orogenic belt and the northern Ordos Block. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(1): 87–97. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao G H, Li Y, Yan Z K et al., 2014. Tectonic geomorphology analysis of piedmont rivers in the middle MT. Longmenshan based on Hack profile and hypsometric integral. Quaternary Sciences, 34(2): 302–310. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Zheng M L, Jin Z J, Wang Y et al., 2006. Structural characteristics and evolution of the North Ordos Basin in Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 28(3): 31–36. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface ProcessesInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CASBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.China University of GeosciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations