Advertisement

Smooth particle hydrodynamics studies of wet granular column collapses

  • Guanjin Wang
  • Amir Riaz
  • Balakumar BalachandranEmail author
Research Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Dry granular materials have been the subject of many investigations, while wet granular materials, which widely exist in many real-world applications, have only received limited attention. The aim of this paper is to address the missing gap in continuum modeling of wet granular materials. To study the wet granular flows, a grain-scale capillary interaction is introduced, as additional cohesive stress in the continuum-scale framework. We coupled the viscoplastic constitutive law for dry granular material and cohesion model for wet isotropic granular material to capture the behavior of wet granular materials. This combined model is implemented in a smooth particle hydrodynamics framework because the meshfree nature of this method captures the large deformation of granular flows without local grid distortion. The Wendland kernel is used as the interpolation kernel to improve numerical stability. This framework is validated by comparing numerical results with recent experimental findings for both dry and wet cases. The comparisons are illustrative of the potential of the framework to capture the behavior of granular materials across different phases. For different levels of friction and water content, the run-out dynamics and shear strength properties of granular materials in the final quasi-static regime are investigated. For granular flows on flat surfaces, compared with dry granular materials, with the introduction of surface tension in wet granular materials, it is found that there are increases in shear stresses locally and globally, enabling stronger internal forces to support structures with larger angles of repose. The surface energy-induced cohesion is found to play an important role in low friction cases compared to high friction cases. To benchmark the numerical framework presented here, granular column collapses on curved surfaces are also investigated. For flows on curved surfaces, although there are also increases in internal shear stresses, the differences in final profiles between wet granular materials and dry granular materials are not as pronounced as that on flat surfaces due to geometric constraints. The findings of this work are demonstrative of the capabilities of the smooth particle hydrodynamics method for the study of wet granular materials. This effort can serve as a step forward in the quest for a unified continuum theory and computational framework of granular material dynamics.

Keywords

Capillary interaction Cohesive stress Constitutive modeling Continuum modeling Smooth particle hydrodynamics Wet granular material 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for the many constructive suggestions provided during the review process. Support received for this work through US National Science Foundation Grant No.1507612 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Artoni R, Santomaso AC, Gabrieli F, Tono D, Cola S (2013) Collapse of quasi-two-dimensional wet granular columns. Phys Rev E 87(3):032205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bui HH, Fukagawa R, Sako K, Ohno S (2008) Lagrangian meshfree particles method (SPH) for large deformation and failure flows of geomaterial using elastic–plastic soil constitutive model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(12):1537–1570CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell CS (1990) Rapid granular flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 22(1):57–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chabalko C, Balachandran B (2013) GPU based simulation of physical systems characterized by mobile discrete interactions. In: Topping BHV, Ivanyi P (eds) Developments in parallel, distributed, grid, and cloud computing in engineering. Saxe-Coburg Publications, pp 95–124Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chambon G, Bouvarel R, Laigle D, Naaim M (2011) Numerical simulations of granular free-surface flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 166(12–13):698–712CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen W, Qiu T (2011) Numerical simulations for large deformation of granular materials using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. Int J Geomech 12(2):127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Da Cruz F, Emam S, Prochnow M, Roux JN, Chevoir F (2005) Rheophysics of dense granular materials: discrete simulation of plane shear flows. Phys Rev E 72(2):021309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dehnen W, Aly H (2012) Improving convergence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations without pairing instability. Mon Not R Astron Soc 425(2):1068–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dunatunga S (2015) Simulation of granular flows through their many phases. In: APS meeting abstractsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gabrieli F, Lambert P, Cola S, Calvetti F (2012) Micromechanical modelling of erosion due to evaporation in a partially wet granular slope. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36(7):918–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabrieli F, Artoni R, Santomaso A, Cola S (2013) Discrete particle simulations and experiments on the collapse of wet granular columns. Phys Fluids 25(10):103303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo N, Zhao J (2014) A coupled FEM/DEM approach for hierarchical multiscale modelling of granular media. Int J Numer Methods Eng 99(11):789–818MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henann DL, Kamrin K (2013) A predictive, size-dependent continuum model for dense granular flows. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(17):6730–6735MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hurley RC, Andrade JE (2017) Continuum modeling of rate-dependent granular flows in SPH. Comput Part Mech 4(1):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ionescu IR, Mangeney A, Bouchut F, Roche O (2015) Viscoplastic modeling of granular column collapse with pressure-dependent rheology. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 219:1–18MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2006) A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441(7094):727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamrin K, Koval G (2012) Nonlocal constitutive relation for steady granular flow. Phys Rev Lett 108(17):178301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kermani E, Qiu T (2018) Simulation of quasi-static axisymmetric collapse of granular columns using smoothed particle hydrodynamics and discrete element methods. Acta Geotech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0707-9
  19. 19.
    Knepper WA (ed) (1962) Agglomeration. Interscience Publishers, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Korzani MG, Galindo-Torres SA, Scheuermann A, Williams DJ (2018) SPH approach for simulating hydro-mechanical processes with large deformations and variable permeabilities. Acta Geotech 13(2):303–316Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kou B, Cao Y, Li J, Xia C, Li Z, Dong H, Zhang A, Zhang J, Kob W, Wang Y (2017) Granular materials flow like complex fluids. Nature 551(7680):360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lagrée PY, Staron L, Popinet S (2011) The granular column collapse as a continuum: validity of a two-dimensional Navier–Stokes model with a $\mu $(I)-rheology. J Fluid Mech 686:378–408MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu GR, Liu MB (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mao Z, Liu GR, Dong X (2017) A comprehensive study on the parameters setting in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method applied to hydrodynamics problems. Comput Geotech 92:77–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marrone S, Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Colicchio G, Le Touzé D, Graziani G (2011) $\delta $-SPH model for simulating violent impact flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(13–16):1526–1542MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    MiDi GDR (2004) On dense granular flows. Eur Phys J E 14(4):341–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Minatti L, Paris E (2015) A SPH model for the simulation of free surface granular flows in a dense regime. Appl Math Model 39(1):363–382MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mitarai N, Nori F (2006) Wet granular materials. Adv Phys 55(1–2):1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110(2):399–406MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monaghan JJ (2000) SPH without a tensile instability. J Comput Phys 159(2):290–311MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morris JP, Fox PJ, Zhu Y (1997) Modeling low Reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. J Comput Phys 136(1):214–226CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neto AHF, Borja RI (2018) Continuum hydrodynamics of dry granular flows employing multiplicative elastoplasticity. Acta Geotech 13(5):1027–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen CT, Nguyen CT, Bui HH, Nguyen GD, Fukagawa R (2017) A new SPH-based approach to simulation of granular flows using viscous damping and stress regularisation. Landslides 14(1):69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peng C, Guo X, Wu W, Wang Y (2016) Unified modelling of granular media with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Acta Geotech 11(6):1231–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pouliquen O, Forterre Y (2002) Friction law for dense granular flows: application to the motion of a mass down a rough inclined plane. J Fluid Mech 453:133–151CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Richefeu V, El Youssoufi MS, Radjai F (2006) Shear strength properties of wet granular materials. Phys Rev E 73(5):051304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Richefeu V, El Youssoufi MS, Peyroux R, Radjai F (2008) A model of capillary cohesion for numerical simulations of 3D polydisperse granular media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(11):1365–1383CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rognon PG, Roux JN, Naaim M, Chevoir F (2008) Dense flows of cohesive granular materials. J Fluid Mech 596:21–47CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Samadani A, Kudrolli A (2001) Angle of repose and segregation in cohesive granular matter. Phys Rev E 64(5):051301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Silbert LE, Ertaş D, Grest GS, Halsey TC, Levine D, Plimpton SJ (2001) Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology. Phys Rev E 64(5):051302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Staron L, Hinch EJ (2005) Study of the collapse of granular columns using two-dimensional discrete-grain simulation. J Fluid Mech 545:1–27CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Szewc K (2017) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of granular column collapse. Granul Matter 19(1):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang JP, Gallo E, François B, Gabrieli F, Lambert P (2017) Capillary force and rupture of funicular liquid bridges between three spherical bodies. Powder Technol 305:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang G, Riaz A, Balachandran B (2017) Computational studies on interactions between robot leg and deformable terrain. Proc Eng 199:2439–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guanjin Wang
    • 1
  • Amir Riaz
    • 1
  • Balakumar Balachandran
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations