Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 597–613 | Cite as

Characterization of contact properties in biocemented sand using 3D X-ray micro-tomography

  • Abdelali DaddaEmail author
  • Christian Geindreau
  • Fabrice Emeriault
  • Sabine Rolland du Roscoat
  • Annette Esnault Filet
  • Aurélie Garandet
Research Paper


The mechanical efficiency of the biocementation process is directly related to the microstructural properties of the biocemented sand, such as the volume fraction of calcite, its distribution within the pore space (localized at the contact between grains, over the grain surfaces) and the contact properties: coordination number, contact surface area, contacts orientation and types of contact. In the present work, all these micromechanical properties are computed, for the first time, from 3D images obtained by X-ray tomography of intact biocemented sand samples. The evolution of all these properties with respect to the volume fraction of calcite is analyzed and compared between each other (from untreated sand to highly cemented sand). Whatever the volume fraction of calcite, it is shown that the precipitation of the calcite is localized at the contacts between grains. These results are confirmed by comparing our numerical results with analytical estimates assuming that the granular medium is made of periodic simple cubic arrangements of grains and by considering two extreme cases of precipitation: (1) The calcite is localized at the contact, and (2) the grains are covered by a uniform layer of calcite. In overall, the obtained results show that a small percentage of calcite is sufficient to get a large amount of cohesive contacts.


Biocementation Contact orientation Contact surface area Coordination number MICP X-ray micro-tomography 



This research is part of the BOREAL project founded under FUI 16 program and receives financial support from BPI, Metropole de Lyon and CD73. The authors acknowledge the technical support provided by Axelera Indura and all the BOREAL project partners for this research, and in particular the CNR company for funding the first author’s PhD thesis. 3SR laboratory is part of the LabEx Tec 21 (Investissements d’Avenir–Grant Agreement ANR11 269 LABX0030).


  1. 1.
    Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Géotechnique 63(4):331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(8):992–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andò E (2013) Experimental investigation of microstructural changes in deforming granular media using x-ray tomography. Ph.D. thesis, Université Grenoble AlpesGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao J, Jung J, Song X, Bate B (2018) On the soil water characteristic curves of poorly graded granular materials in aqueous polymer solutions. Acta Geotech 13(1):103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang I, Cho GC (2018) Shear strength behavior and parameters of microbial gellan gum-treated soils: from sand to clay. Acta Geotech. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng L, Cord-Ruwisch R, Shahin MA (2013) Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation. Can Geotech J 50:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui MJ, Zheng JJ, Zhang RJ, Lai HJ, Zhang J (2017) Influence of cementation level on the strength behaviour of bio-cemented sand. Acta Geotech 12(5):971–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dadda A, Geindreau C, Emeriault F, du Roscoat SR, Garandet A, Sapin L, Filet AE (2017) Characterization of microstructural and physical properties changes in biocemented sand using 3D X-ray microtomography. Acta Geotech 12(5):955–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Druckrey AM, Khalid A, Alshibli KA, Al-Raoush RI (2016) 3D characterization of sand particle-to-particle contact and morphology. Comput Geotech 74:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng K, Montoya BM (2016) Influence of confinement and cementation level on the behavior of microbial-induced calcite precipitated Sands under monotonic drained loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(1):04015057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fonseca J, O’Sullivan C, Coop MR, Lee PD (2013) Quantifying the evolution of soil fabric during shearing using directional parameters. Géotechnique 63(6):487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang NJ, Soga K (2016) The applicability of microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for internal erosion control in gravel-sand mixtures. Géotechnique 67(1):42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jiang NJ, Soga K, Dawoud O (2014) Experimental study of mitigation of soil internal erosion by microbially induced calcite precipitation. In: Garlanger JE, Iskander M, Hussein MH (eds) Geo-Congress 2014. Atlanta,Georgia, USA, February 23-26, 2014. ASCE, Reston, pp 1586–1595Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Legland D, Kieu K, Devaux MF (2007) Computation of Minkowski measures on 2D and 3D binary images. Image Anal Stereol 26:83–92MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu YS, Yi J, Zhang H, Zheng GQ, Paul JC (2010) Surface area estimation of digitized 3D objects using quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Pattern Recognit 43:3900–3909CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martinez B, DeJong J (2009) bio-mediated soil improvement: load transfer mechanisms at the micro- and macro- scales. In: Han J, Zheng G, Schaefer VR, Huang M (eds) Advances in ground improvement: proceedings U.S.-China workshop on ground improvement technologies 2009, Orlando, Florida, United States, March 14, 2009. ASCE, Reston, pp 242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martinez B, Dejong JT, Ginn TR, Montoya BM, Barkouki TH, Hunt C, Tanyu B, Major D (2013) Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(04):587–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montoya BM, DeJong JT, Boulanger RW (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Géotechnique 63(4):302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murtala U, Khairul AK, Kenny TPC (2016) Biological process of soil improvement in civil engineering: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:767–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(62–66):1979Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rong H, Li L, Qian C (2013) Influence of number of injections on mechanical properties of sandstone cemented with microbe cement. Adv Cem Res J 25(6):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sel I, Ozhan HB, Cibik R, Buyukcangaz E (2014) Bacteria-induced cementation process in loose sand medium. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 33(5):403–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Semnani SJ, Borja RI (2017) Quantifying the heterogeneity of shale through statistical combination of imaging across scales. Acta Geotech 12(6):1193–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tagliaferri F, Waller J, Andò E, Hall SA, Viggiani G, Bésuelle P, DeJong JT (2011) Observing strain localisation processes in bio-cemented sand using x-ray imaging. Granul Matter 13(3):247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tobler DJ, Maclachlan E, Phoenix VR (2012) Microbially mediation plugging of porous media and the impact of differing injection strategies. Ecol Eng J 42:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Paassen LA, Ghose R, Linden TJ, Van Der Star WR, Van Loosdrecht MC (2010) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1721–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Whiffin VS, Van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, GINP, Laboratoire Sols, Solides, Structures et Risques (3SR)Université Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Soletanche BachyRueil-MalmaisonFrance
  3. 3.Compagnie Nationale du RhôneLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations