Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the carbon cycle on the attribution of responsibility for climate change

  • Article
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

The carbon cycle is one of the fundamental climate change issues. Its long-term evolution largely affects the amplitude and trend of human-induced climate change, as well as the formulation and implementation of emission reduction policy and technology for stabilizing the atmospheric CO2 concentration. Two earth system models incorporating the global carbon cycle, the Community Earth System Model and the Beijing Normal University-Earth System Model, were used to investigate the effect of the carbon cycle on the attribution of the historical responsibility for climate change. The simulations show that when compared with the criterion based on cumulative emissions, the developed (developing) countries’ responsibility is reduced (increased) by 6 %–10 % using atmospheric CO2 concentration as the criterion. This discrepancy is attributed to the fact that the developed world contributed approximately 61 %–68 % (61 %–64 %) to the change in global oceanic (terrestrial) carbon sequestration for the period from 1850 to 2005, whereas the developing world contributed approximately 32 %–49 % (36 %–39 %). Under a developed world emissions scenario, the relatively larger uptake of global carbon sinks reduced the developed countries’ responsibility for carbon emissions but increased their responsibility for global ocean acidification (68 %). In addition, the large emissions from the developed world reduced the efficiency of the global carbon sinks, which may affect the long-term carbon sequestration and exacerbate global warming in the future. Therefore, it is necessary to further consider the interaction between carbon emissions and the carbon cycle when formulating emission reduction policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 134–140

    Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keeling RF, Piper SC, Heimann M (1996) Global and hemispheric CO2 sinks deduced from changes in atmospheric O2 concentration. Nature 381:218–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W et al (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 458:1158–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. UNFCCC (2011) Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010 http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/sb/eng/inf01r01.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  6. Hedenus F, Azar C (2005) Estimates of trends in global income and resource inequalities. Ecol Econ 55:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Groot L (2010) Carbon Lorenz curves. Resour Energy Econ 32:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Teng F, He JK, Pan XZ et al (2010) How to measure carbon equity: carbon Gini index based on historical cumulative emission per capita. Adv Clim Change Res 6:449–455 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baumert KA, Herzog T, Pershing J (2005) Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gases and international climate change agreements. http://pdf.wri.org/navigating_numbers.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  10. He JK, Chen WY, Teng F et al (2009) Long-term climate change mitigation target and carbon permit allocation. Adv Clim Change Res 5:362–368 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ding ZL, Duan XN, Ge QS et al (2009) Control of atmospheric CO2 concentration by 2050: an allocation on the emission rights of different countries. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 39:1009–1027

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fung IY, Donry SC, Lindsay K et al (2005) Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11201–11206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. UNFCCC (1997) Paper No. 1: Proposed elements of a protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. http://unfccc.int/cop5/resource/docs/1997/agbm/misc01a3.htm. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  14. den Elzen M, Schaeffer M (2002) Responsibility for past and future global warming: uncertainties in attributing anthropogenic climate change. Clim Change 54:29–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Höhne N, Blok K (2005) Calculating historical contributions to climate change–discussing the ‘Brazilian Proposal’. Clim Change 71:141–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prather MJ, Penner JE, Fuglestvedt JS et al (2009) Tracking uncertainties in the causal chain from human activities to climate. Geophys Res Lett 36:L05707

    Google Scholar 

  17. Höhne N, Blum H, Fuglestvedt J et al (2011) Contributions of individual countries’ emissions to climate change and their uncertainty. Clim Change 106:359–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. den Elzen M, Fuglestvedt J, Höhne N et al (2005) Analysing countries’ contribution to climate change: scientific and policy-related choices. Environ Sci Policy 8:614–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Höhne N, Blok K (2005) Calculating historical contributions to climate change: discussing the ‘Brazilian proposal’. Clim Change 71:141–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei T, Yang SL, Moore JC et al (2012) Developed and developing world responsibilities for historical climate change and CO2 mitigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:12911–12915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG et al (2009) Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci 2:831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Frank DC, Esper J, Raible CC et al (2010) Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate. Nature 463:527–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thornton PE, Rosenbloom NA (2005) Ecosystem model spin-up: estimating steady state conditions in a coupled terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycle model. Ecol Model 189:25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas H, Prowe AE, Lima D et al (2008) Changes in the North Atlantic Oscillation influence CO2 uptake in the North Atlantic over the past two decades. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 224:GB4027

    Google Scholar 

  25. Doney SC, Lindasy K, Fung I et al (2006) Natural variability in a stable, 1000-year global coupled climate-carbon cycle simulation. J Clim 19:3033–3054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gent PR, Danabasoglu G, Donner LJ et al (2011) The community climate system model version 4. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 24:4973–4991

    Google Scholar 

  27. BNU-ESM (2012) http://esg.bnu.edu.cn/BNU_ESM_webs/htmls/index.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  28. Yan Q, Wang HJ, Johannessen OM et al (2014) Greenland ice sheet contribution to future global sea level rise based on CMIP5 models. Adv Atmos Sci 31:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yan Q, Zhang ZS, Wang HJ et al (2014) Simulation of Greenland ice sheet during the mid-Pliocene warm period. Chin Sci Bull 59:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Foring data for CMIP5 (2012) http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/forcing.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  31. The Global Carbon Project (2013) http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/index.htm. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  32. Andres RJ, Gregg JS, Losey L et al (2011) Monthly, global emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel consumption. Tellus B 63:309–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Keppel-Aleks G, Randerson JT, Lindsay K et al (2013) Atmospheric carbon dioxide variability in the Community Earth System Model: evaluation and transient dynamic during the twentieth and twenty first centuries. J Clim. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00589.1

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sabine CL, Feely RA, Gruber N et al (2004) The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 305:367–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao ZQ, Liu JY (2008) Simulation study of China’s net primary production. Chin Sci Bull 53:434–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peng J, Dong WJ, Yuan WP et al (2013) Effects of increased CO2 on land water balance from 1850 to 1989. Thero Appl Climatol 111:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Farquhar GD, Caemmerer SV, Berry JA (1980) A biochemicalmodel of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C-3 species. Planta 149:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson SL, Govindasamy B, Mirin A et al (2004) Quantifying the effects of CO2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophys Res Lett 31:L23211

    Google Scholar 

  39. Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL et al (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:8903–8908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaplan JO, Krumhardt KM, Zimmermann N (2009) The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat Sci Rev 28:3016–3034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Crossette B, Kollodge R, Froseth R et al (2011) State of World Population. http://www.unfpa.org/swp/. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2012YBXS27) and the National Key Program for Global Change Research of China (2010CB950500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjie Dong.

About this article

Cite this article

Wei, T., Dong, W., Yuan, W. et al. Influence of the carbon cycle on the attribution of responsibility for climate change. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 2356–2362 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0196-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0196-7

Keywords

Navigation