Advertisement

An adaptive offloading framework for Android applications in mobile edge computing

  • Xing Chen
  • Shihong Chen
  • Yun Ma
  • Bichun Liu
  • Ying Zhang
  • Gang HuangEmail author
Research Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Mobile edge computing (MEC) provides a fresh opportunity to significantly reduce the latency and battery energy consumption of mobile applications. It does so by enabling the offloading of parts of the applications on mobile edges, which are located in close proximity to the mobile devices. Owing to the geographical distribution of mobile edges and the mobility of mobile devices, the runtime environment of MEC is highly complex and dynamic. As a result, it is challenging for application developers to support computation offloading in MEC compared with the traditional approach in mobile cloud computing, where applications use only the cloud for offloading. On the one hand, developers have to make the offloading adaptive to the changing environment, where the offloading should dynamically occur among available computation nodes. On the other hand, developers have to effectively determine the offloading scheme each time the environment changes. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an adaptive framework that supports mobile applications with offloading capabilities in MEC. First, based on our previous study (DPartner), a new design pattern is proposed to enable an application to be dynamically offloaded among mobile devices, mobile edges, and the cloud. Second, an estimation model is designed to automatically determine the offloading scheme. In this model, different parts of the application may be executed on different computation nodes. Finally, an adaptive offloading framework is implemented to support the design pattern and the estimation model. We evaluate our framework on two real-world applications. The results demonstrate that our approach can aid in reducing the response time by 8%–50% and energy consumption by 9%–51% for computation-intensive applications.

Keywords

computation offloading software adaptation mobile edge computing application refactoring Android 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB1002000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61725201), and Talent Program of Fujian Province for Distinguished Young Scholars in Higher Education. Yun MA’s work was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Berglund M E, Duvall J, Dunne L E. A survey of the historical scope and current trends of wearable technology applications. In: Proceedings of ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Heidelberg, 2016. 40–43Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang F C, Li J L, Lei T, et al. Architecture and key technologies for Internet of vehicles: a survey. J Commun Inf Netw, 2017, 2: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li P, Yu X, Peng X Y, et al. Fault-tolerant cooperative control for multiple UAVs based on sliding mode techniques. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 070204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mei H, Liu X Z. Software techniques for Internet computing: current situation and future trend. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 3510–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang K, Ou S M, Chen H H. On effective offloading services for resource-constrained mobile devices running heavier mobile Internet applications. IEEE Commun Mag, 2008, 46: 56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paradiso J A, Starner T. Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics. IEEE Pervasive Comput, 2005, 4: 18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar K, Lu Y H. Cloud computing for mobile users. Computer, 2011, 43: 51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goyal S, Carter J. A lightweight secure cyber foraging infrastructure for resource-constrained devices. In: Proceedings of Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Windermere, 2004. 186–195Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balan R, Flinn J, Satyanarayanan M, et al. The case for cyber foraging. In: Proceedings of ACM Sigops European Workshop, Saint-Emilion, 2002. 87–92Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balan R K, Gergle D, Satyanarayanan M, et al. Simplifying cyber foraging for mobile devices. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, San Juan, 2007. 272–285Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Balan R K, Satyanarayanan M, Park S Y, et al. Tactics-based remote execution for mobile computing. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, San Francisco, 2003. 273–286Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gu X H, Nahrstedt K, Messer A, et al. Adaptive offloading inference for delivering applications in pervasive computing environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Fort Worth, 2003. 107Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar K, Liu J B, Lu Y H, et al. A survey of computation offloading for mobile systems. Mobile Netw Appl, 2013, 18: 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Philippsen M, Zenger M. JavaParty — transparent remote objects in Java. Concurrency-Pract Exper, 1997, 9: 1225–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hunt G C, Scott M L. The coign automatic distributed partitioning system. In: Proceedings of Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, La Jolla, 1999. 252–262Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi W S, Cao J, Zhang Q, et al. Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J, 2016, 3: 637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiang M, Zhang T. Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J, 2016, 3: 854–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tran T X, Hajisami A, Pandey P, et al. Collaborative mobile edge computing in 5G networks: new paradigms, scenarios, and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abbas N, Zhang Y, Taherkordi A, et al. Mobile edge computing: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J, 2018, 5: 450–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang S G, Xu J L, Zhang N, et al. A survey on service migration in mobile edge computing. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 23511–23528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang Y, Huang G, Liu X Z, et al. Refactoring Android Java code for on-demand computation offloading. SIGPLAN Not, 2012, 47: 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen X, Chen S H, Zeng X, et al. Framework for context-aware computation offloading in mobile cloud computing. J Cloud Comp, 2017, 6: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen X, Jiao L, Li W Z, et al. Efficient multi-user computation offloading for mobile-edge cloud computing. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw, 2016, 24: 2795–2808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen X. Decentralized computation offloading game for mobile cloud computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst, 2015, 26: 974–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lei T, Wang S G, Li J L, et al. AOM: adaptive mobile data traffic offloading for M2M networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput, 2016, 20: 863–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang S G, Lei T, Zhang L Y, et al. Offloading mobile data traffic for QoS-aware service provision in vehicular cyber-physical systems. Future Gener Comput Syst, 2016, 61: 118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kemp R, Palmer N, Kielmann T, et al. Cuckoo: a computation offloading framework for smartphones. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services, Santa Clara, 2010. 59–79Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cuervo E, Balasubramanian A, Cho D K, et al. Maui: making smartphones last longer with code offload. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, San Francisco, 2010. 49–62Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kosta S, Aucinas A, Hui P, et al. Thinkair: dynamic resource allocation and parallel execution in the cloud for mobile code offloading. In: Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, Orlando, 2012. 945–953Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chun B G, Ihm S, Maniatis P, et al. Clonecloud: elastic execution between mobile device and cloud. In: Proceedings of Conference on Computer Systems, Salzburg, 2011. 301–314Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou B W, Dastjerdi A V, Calheiros R N, et al. A context sensitive offloading scheme for mobile cloud computing service. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, Washington, 2015. 869–876Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cheng Z X, Li P, Wang J B, et al. Just-in-time code offloading for wearable computing. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput, 2015, 3: 74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jin X M, Liu Y N, Fan W H, et al. Multisite computation offloading in dynamic mobile cloud environments. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 089301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huang G, Cai H Q, Swiech M, et al. DelayDroid: an instrumented approach to reducing tail-time energy of Android apps. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 012106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xing Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shihong Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yun Ma
    • 3
  • Bichun Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ying Zhang
    • 4
  • Gang Huang
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Mathematics and Computer ScienceFuzhou UniversityFuzhouChina
  2. 2.Fujian Key Laboratory of Network Computing and Intelligent Information ProcessingFuzhou UniversityFuzhouChina
  3. 3.School of SoftwareTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of High Confidence Software TechnologiesMinistry of EducationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations