Challenges and developments of automotive fuel cell hybrid power system and control

  • Jinwu Gao
  • Meng Li
  • Yunfeng HuEmail author
  • Hong ChenEmail author
  • Yan Ma


Fuel cells are emerging as promising power sources and have attracted increasing attention from industries and academics worldwide. In particular, automotive manufacturers are replacing internal combustion engines in vehicles with fuel cell systems, which are advantaged by zero emissions, high efficiency, and various clean routes that generate pure hydrogen. However, current fuel cell systems are costly, and their corresponding infrastructures are not fully qualified to meet current market demand. This paper reviews the challenges and developments of automotive fuel cell hybrid power systems and their controls. It briefly summarizes the model, control, and optimization issue associated with the research and application of fuel cells in hybrid power systems. After presenting the basic knowledge and discussing the trending size and structure of fuel cells for automotive usage, the review describes models of automotive fuel cell systems, focusing on the electrochemical reaction dynamics and the key parameters influencing their efficiency and lifetime. The control problems associated with automotive fuel cell systems as well as the optimization issue associated with hybrid energy systems (comprising fuel cells, batteries, and ultra-capacitors) are elaborately analyzed. The review concludes with current problems and challenges faced by the energy control systems of fuel cell vehicles.


fuel cell system automotive fuel cell control optimization issue hybrid energy system 



This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFB0102800, 2018YFB0105300) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61703179, 61703177).


  1. 1.
    U.S. Energy Information Administration. Monthly energy review. 2018. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    California Fuel Cell Partnership. A california road map: the commercialization of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. 2012. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. DRIVE (Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability). Fuel cell technical team roadmap. 2013. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission. Hydrogen energy and fuel cells: a vision of our future. 2003. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Public Works and Government Services Canada. Canadian fuel cell commercialization roadmap update — progress of Canada’s Hydrogen and fuel cell industry. 2008. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E4tech and Element Energy. Hydrogen and fuel cells: opportunities for growth: a roadmap for the UK. 2016. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Daud W R W, Rosli R E, Majlan E H, et al. PEM fuel cell system control: a review. Renew Energy, 2017, 113: 620–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Das V, Padmanaban S, Venkitusamy K, et al. Recent advances and challenges of fuel cell based power system architectures and control — a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 73: 10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barbir F, Yazici S. Status and development of PEM fuel cell technology. Int J Energy Res, 2008, 32: 369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pollet B G, Staffell I, Shang J L. Current status of hybrid, battery and fuel cell electric vehicles: from electrochemistry to market prospects. Electrochim Acta, 2012, 84: 235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eudy L, Post M, Gikakis C. Fuel Cell Buses in U.S. Transit Fleets: Current Status 2015. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-64974, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. 2017 annual merit rewiew and peer evaluation report. 2017. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hua T, Ahluwalia R, Eudy L, et al. Status of hydrogen fuel cell electric buses worldwide. J Power Source, 2014, 269: 975–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nishikawa H, Sasou H, Kurihara R, et al. High fuel utilization operation of pure hydrogen fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 6262–6269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han I S, Jeong J, Shin H K. PEM fuel-cell stack design for improved fuel utilization. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 11996–12006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nonobe Y. Development of the fuel cell vehicle mirai. IEEJ Trans Elec Electron Eng, 2017, 12: 5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Emadi A, Williamson S S, Khaligh A. Power electronics intensive solutions for advanced electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicular power systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2006, 21: 567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das H S, Tan C W, Yatim A H M. Fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles: a review on power conditioning units and topologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 76: 268–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim S. Physical damage of polymer electrolyte fuel cells subject to freezing. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. State College: The Pennsylvania State University, 2008Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wöhr M, Bolwin K, Schnurnberger W, et al. Dynamic modelling and simulation of a polymer membrane fuel cell including mass transport limitation. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 1998, 23: 213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asl S M S, Rowshanzamir S, Eikani M H. Modelling and simulation of the steady-state and dynamic behaviour of a PEM fuel cell. Energy, 2010, 35: 1633–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saengrung A, Abtahi A, Zilouchian A. Neural network model for a commercial PEM fuel cell system. J Power Source, 2007, 172: 749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rakhshanpouri S, Rowshanzamir S. Water transport through a PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell in a seven-layer model. Energy, 2013, 50: 220–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Le A D, Zhou B. A general model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Source, 2008, 182: 197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scott K, Argyropoulos P. A current distribution model of a porous fuel cell electrode. J Electroanal Chem, 2004, 567: 103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shan Y, Choe S Y. A high dynamic PEM fuel cell model with temperature effects. J Power Source, 2005, 145: 30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thampan T, Malhotra S, Tang H, et al. Modeling of conductive transport in proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2000, 147: 3242–3250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Janssen G J M. A phenomenological model of water transport in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc, 2001, 148: 1313–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vasu G, Tangirala A K. Control-orientated thermal model for proton-exchange membrane fuel cell systems. J Power Source, 2008, 183: 98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nolan J, Kolodziej J. Modeling of an automotive fuel cell thermal system. J Power Source, 2010, 195: 4743–4752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Amphlett J C. Performance modeling of the ballard mark IV solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc, 1995, 142: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kordesch K V, Simader G R. Fuel Cells and Their Applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Springer T E. Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model. J Electrochem Soc, 1991, 138: 2334–2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guzzella L. Control oriented modelling of fuel-cell based vehicles. In: Proceedings of NSF Workshop on the Integration of Modeling and Control for Automotive Systems, 1999Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pukrushpan J T. Modeling and control of fuel cell systems and fuel processors. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2003Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pathapati P R, Xue X M, Tang J T. A new dynamic model for predicting transient phenomena in a PEM fuel cell system. Renew Energy, 2005, 30: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heywood J B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yu S. Thermal modeling of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2006Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moré J J, Puleston P F, Kunusch C, et al. Temperature control of a PEM fuel cell test bench for experimental MEA assessment. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 5985–5990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang Q, Cui N X, Shang Y L, et al. Relevance between fractional-order hybrid model and unified equivalent circuit model of electric vehicle power battery. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 070208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rojas J D, Kunusch C, Ocampo-Martinez C, et al. Control-oriented thermal modeling methodology for water-cooled PEM fuel-cell-based systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 5146–5154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li X, Deng Z H, Wei D, et al. Novel variable structure control for the temperature of PEM fuel cell stack based on the dynamic thermal affine model. Energy Convers Manage, 2011, 52: 3265–3274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen D M. Modeling and control of PEM fuel cell humiditication system. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2006Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pukrushpan J T, Stefanopoulou A G, Peng H. Control of fuel cell breathing. IEEE Control Syst Mag, 2004, 24: 30–46MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rakhtala S M, Noei A R, Ghaderi R, et al. Design of finite-time high-order sliding mode state observer: a practical insight to PEM fuel cell system. J Process Control, 2014, 24: 203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kim E S, Kim C J. Nonlinear state feedback control of PEM fuel cell systems. J Energy Power Eng, 2010, 4: 8–14Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baroud Z, Gazzam N, Benalia A, et al. Algebraic observer design for PEM fuel cell system. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, 2016. 966–970Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu J M, Lin W Y, Alsaadi F, et al. Nonlinear observer design for PEM fuel cell power systems via second order sliding mode technique. Neurocomputing, 2015, 168: 145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu J X. Contributions to adaptative higher order sliding mode observers: application to fuel cell an power converters. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Belfort: University of Technology of Belfort-Montbeliard, 2014Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Laghrouche S, Liu J, Ahmed F S, et al. Adaptive second-order sliding mode observer-based fault reconstruction for PEM fuel cell air-feed system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2015, 23: 1098–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Luna J, Ocampo-Martinez C, Serra M. Nonlinear predictive control for the concentrations profile regulation under unknown reaction disturbances in a fuel cell anode gas channel. J Power Source, 2015, 282: 129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thomya A, Khunatorn Y. Design of control system of Hydrogen and oxygen flow rate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell using fuzzy logic controller. Energy Procedia, 2011, 9: 186–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pukrushpan J T, Stefanopoulou A G, Peng H. Modeling and control for fuel cell stack system. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), 2002. 3117–3122Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Talj R J, Ortega R, Hilairet M. A controller tuning methodology for the air supply system of a PEM fuel-cell system with guaranteed stability properties. Int J Control, 2009, 82: 1706–1719MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Grujicic M, Chittajallu K M, Law E H, et al. Model-based control strategies in the dynamic interaction of air supply and fuel cell. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A-J Power Energy, 2004, 218: 487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Torres D H, Sename O, Riu D. An LPV control approach for a fuel cell power generator air supply system. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), 2012. 4299–4304Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hernández-Torres D, Riu D, Sename O. Reduced-order robust control of a fuel cell air supply system. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2017, 50: 96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Methekar R N, Prasad V, Gudi R D. Dynamic analysis and linear control strategies for proton exchange membrane fuel cell using a distributed parameter model. J Power Source, 2007, 165: 152–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Matraji I, Laghrouche S, Jemei S, et al. Robust control of the PEM fuel cell air-feed system via sub-optimal second order sliding mode. Appl Energy, 2013, 104: 945–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Garcia-Gabin W, Dorado F, Bordons C. Real-time implementation of a sliding mode controller for air supply on a PEM fuel cell. J Process Control, 2010, 20: 325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Williams J G, Liu G, Chai S, et al. Intelligent control for improvements in PEM fuel cell flow performance. Int J Autom Comput, 2008, 5: 145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Baroud Z, Benmiloud M, Benalia A, et al. Novel hybrid fuzzy-PID control scheme for air supply in PEM fuel-cell-based systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 10435–10447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rgab O, Yu D L, Gomm J B. Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell control with feed-forward and feedback strategy. Int J Eng Sci Technol, 2010, 2: 56–66Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Danzer M A, Wittmann S J, Hofer E P. Prevention of fuel cell starvation by model predictive control of pressure, excess ratio, and current. J Power Source, 2009, 190: 86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Arce A, Ramíez D R, Real A J D, et al. Constrained explicit predictive control strategies for PEM fuel cell systems. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2007. 6088–6093Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tang L, Landers R G. Coordinated control of fuel cell air supply system using model predictive control. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, 2010. 735–741Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Guo L L, Gao B Z, Li Y, et al. A fast algorithm for nonlinear model predictive control applied to HEV energy management systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 092201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kim T H, Kim S H, Lim W, et al. Development of the novel control algorithm for the small proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack without external humidification. J Power Source, 2010, 195: 6008–6015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Suh K W, Stefanopoulou A G. Performance limitations of air flow control in power-autonomous fuel cell systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2007, 15: 465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vahidi A, Stefanopoulou A G, Peng H. Model predictive control for starvation prevention in a hybrid fuel cell system. In: Proceeding of American Control Conference (ACC), 2004. 834–839Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sun J, Kolmanovsky I V. Load governor for fuel cell oxygen starvation protection: a robust nonlinear reference governor approach. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2005, 13: 911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Headley A J, Chen D M, Li W. Non-uniform control volume sizing methodology for relative humidity control of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 23170–23179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Headley A, Yu V, Borduin R, et al. Development and experimental validation of a physics-based PEM fuel cell model for cathode humidity control design. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2016, 21: 1775–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Riascos L A M. Relative humidity control in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells without extra humidification. J Power Source, 2008, 184: 204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Song M C, Pei P C, Zha H S, et al. Water management of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on control of hydrogen pressure drop. J Power Source, 2014, 267: 655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pei P C, Li Y H, Xu H C, et al. A review on water fault diagnosis of PEMFC associated with the pressure drop. Appl Energy, 2016, 173: 366–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Liu Z Y, Chen J, Chen S R, et al. Modeling and control of cathode air humidity for PEM fuel cell systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2017, 50: 4751–4756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Haddad A, Elsoufi L, Mannah M, et al. Efficiency improvement of PEM fuel cells via humidity control. J Control Sci Eng, 2016, 4: 26–35Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Noè R B, Carlos O M, Cristian K. On the anode pressure and humidity regualtion in PEM fuel cells: a nonlinear predictive control approach. IFAC-PapersOnline, 2015, 48: 434–439Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wong K H, Loo K H, Lai Y M, et al. A theoretical study of inlet relative humidity control in PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36: 11871–11885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kim B J, Kim M S. Studies on the cathode humidification by exhaust gas recirculation for PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 4290–4299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Schumacher J O, Gemmar P, Denne M, et al. Control of miniature proton exchange membrane fuel cells based on fuzzy logic. J Power Source, 2004, 129: 143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kunde C, Hanke-Rauschenbach R, Mangold M, et al. Temperature and humidity control of a micro PEM fuel cell stack. Fuel Cell, 2010, 10: 949–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Karnik A Y, Sun J, Stefanopoulou A G, et al. Humidity and pressure regulation in a PEM fuel cell using a gain-scheduled static feedback controller. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2009, 17: 283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    McCain B A, Stefanopoulou A G, Kolmanovsky I V. On the dynamics and control of through-plane water distributions in PEM fuel cells. Chem Eng Sci, 2008, 63: 4418–4432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kolodziej J R. Thermal dynamic modeling and nonlinear control of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. J Fuel Cell Sci Technol, 2007, 4: 255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    O’Keefe D, El-Sharkh M Y, Telotte J C, et al. Temperature dynamics and control of a water-cooled fuel cell stack. J Power Source, 2014, 256: 470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Liso V, Nielsen M P, Kær S K, et al. Thermal modeling and temperature control of a PEM fuel cell system for forklift applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 8410–8420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Shao Q L, Wei D, Cao G G, et al. Dynamic thermal model and temperature control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. Chinese J Chem Eng, 2005, 13: 218–224Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Cheng S L, Fang C, Xu L F, et al. Model-based temperature regulation of a PEM fuel cell system on a city bus. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 13566–13575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Li D Z, Li C, Gao Z Q, et al. On active disturbance rejection in temperature regulation of the proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Source, 2015, 283: 452–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Saygili Y, Eroglu I, Kincal S. Model based temperature controller development for water cooled PEM fuel cell systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Han J, Park J, Yu S. Control strategy of cooling system for the optimization of parasitic power of automotive fuel cell system. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 13549–13557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Han J, Yu S, Yi S. Advanced thermal management of automotive fuel cells using a model reference adaptive control algorithm. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 4328–4341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ahn J W, Choe S Y. Coolant controls of a PEM fuel cell system. J Power Source, 2008, 179: 252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Chen F X, Yu Y, Gao Y. Temperature control for proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on current constraint with consideration of limited cooling capacity. Fuel Cell, 2017, 17: 662–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Li X, Deng Z H, Wei D, et al. Parameter optimization of thermal-model-oriented control law for PEM fuel cell stack via novel genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manage, 2011, 52: 3290–3300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Fly A, Thring R H. Temperature regulation in an evaporatively cooled proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 11976–11982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hwang J J. Thermal control and performance assessment of a proton exchanger membrane fuel cell generator. Appl Energy, 2013, 108: 184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office. Multi-year research, development, and demonstration plan. 2012. Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Mao L, Wang C Y. Analysis of cold start on ploymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc, 2007, 154: 139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Meng H. A PEM fuel cell model for cold-start simulations. J Power Source, 2008, 178: 141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Pierre J S, Roberts J, Colbow K, et al. PEMFC operational and design strategies for Sub zero environments. J New Mater Electrochem Syst, 2005, 8: 163–176Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ge S, Wang C Y. Characteristics of subzero startup and water/ice formation on the catalyst layer in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Electrochim Acta, 2007, 52: 4825–4835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Borup R, Davey H, Garzon F, et al. PEM fuel cell durability with transportation transient operation. ECS Trans, 2006, 3: 879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Pesaran A, Kim G H, Gonder J. PEM fuel cell freeze and rapid startup incestigation. 2005. Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Technical Note of Ballard. Cold weather operation of fuel cell electric buses.
  109. 109.
    Lin B. Thermal Control of Fuel Cell for Improved Cold Start. US Patent, US7534511B2, 2009Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Chacko C, Ramasamy R, Kim S, et al. Characteristic behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cell resistance during cold start. J Electrochem Soc, 2008, 155: 1145–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Gwak G, Ju H. A rapid start-up strategy for polymer electrolyte fuel cells at subzero temperatures based on control of the operating current density. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 11989–11997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Lin R, Weng Y M, Lin X W, et al. Rapid cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cells by the printed circuit board technology. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 18369–18378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jiao K. Experimental and modelling studies of cold start processes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Waterloo: University of Waterloo, 2011Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Zhou Y B, Luo Y Q, Yu S H, et al. Modeling of cold start processes and performance optimization for proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks. J Power Source, 2014, 247: 738–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Henao N, Kelouwani S, Agbossou K, et al. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells cold startup global strategy for fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. J Power Source, 2012, 220: 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Amamou A A, Kelouwani S, Boulon L, et al. A comprehensive review of solutions and strategies for cold start of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cells. IEEE Access, 2016, 4: 4989–5002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Taner T. Energy and exergy analyze of PEM fuel cell: a case study of modeling and simulations. Energy, 2018, 143: 284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Bizon N. Real-time optimization strategy for fuel cell hybrid power sources with load-following control of the fuel or air flow. Energy Convers Manage, 2018, 157: 13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Bizon N. Energy optimization of fuel cell system by using global extremum seeking algorithm. Appl Energy, 2017, 206: 458–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Han I S, Park S K, Chung C B. Modeling and operation optimization of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system for maximum efficiency. Energy Convers Manage, 2016, 113: 52–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Zhao H B, Burke A F. Optimization of fuel cell system operating conditions for fuel cell vehicles. J Power Sources, 2009, 186: 408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Salva J A, Iranzo A, Rosa F, et al. Optimization of a PEM fuel cell operating conditions: obtaining the maximum performance polarization curve. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 19713–19723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Khaligh A, Zhihao Li A. Battery, ultracapacitor, fuel cell, and hybrid energy storage systems for electric, hybrid electric, fuel cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: state of the art. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2010, 59: 2806–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Bendjedia B, Rizoug N, Boukhnifer M, et al. Influence of secondary source technologies and energy management strategies on energy storage system sizing for fuel cell electric vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 11614–11628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Marx N, Hissel D, Gustin F, et al. On the sizing and energy management of an hybrid multistack fuel cell — battery system for automotive applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 1518–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    U.S. Department of Energy. DOE Hydrogen and fuel cells program: 2017 annual progress report. 2017. Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Zhou D M, Ravey A, Al-Durra A, et al. A comparative study of extremum seeking methods applied to online energy management strategy of fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Convers Manage, 2017, 151: 778–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Thounthong P, Raël S, Davat B. Energy management of fuel cell/battery/supercapacitor hybrid power source for vehicle applications. J Power Source, 2009, 193: 376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Erdinc O, Vural B, Uzunoglu M. A wavelet-fuzzy logic based energy management strategy for a fuel cell/battery/ultra-capacitor hybrid vehicular power system. J Power Source, 2009, 194: 369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Tie S F, Tan C W. A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2013, 20: 82–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Schaltz E, Khaligh A, Rasmussen P O. Influence of battery/ultracapacitor energy-storage sizing on battery lifetime in a guel cell hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2009, 58: 3882–3891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Tahri A, Fadil H E, Belhaj F Z, et al. Management of fuel cell power and supercapacitor state-of-charge for electric vehicles. Electric Power Syst Res, 2018, 160: 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Mokrani Z, Rekioua D, Mebarki N, et al. Proposed energy management strategy in electric vehicle for recovering power excess produced by fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 19556–19575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Li Q, Chen W R, Li Y K, et al. Energy management strategy for fuel cell/battery/ultracapacitor hybrid vehicle based on fuzzy logic. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst, 2012, 43: 514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Jeong K S, Lee W Y, Kim C S. Energy management strategies of a fuel cell/battery hybrid system using fuzzy logics. J Power Source, 2005, 145: 319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Zhou D M, Al-Durra A, Gao F, et al. Online energy management strategy of fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles based on data fusion approach. J Power Source, 2017, 366: 278–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Geng C, Jin X F, Zhang X. Simulation research on a novel control strategy for fuel cell extended-range vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018. Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Zandi M, Payman A, Martin J P, et al. Energy management of a fuel cell/supercapacitor/battery power source for electric vehicular applications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2011, 60: 433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Payman A, Pierfederici S, Meibody-Tabar F. Energy control of supercapacitor/fuel cell hybrid power source. Energy Convers Manage, 2008, 49: 1637–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Rodatz P, Paganelli G, Sciarretta A, et al. Optimal power management of an experimental fuel cell/supercapacitor-powered hybrid vehicle. Control Eng Pract, 2005, 13: 41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Hong Z H, Li Q, Han Y, et al. An energy management strategy based on dynamic power factor for fuel cell/battery hybrid locomotive. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 3261–3272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Tribioli L, Cozzolino R, Chiappini D, et al. Energy management of a plug-in fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicle with on-board fuel processing. Appl Energy, 2016, 184: 140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Yuan J N, Yang L, Chen Q. Intelligent energy management strategy based on hierarchical approximate global optimization for plug-in fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 8063–8078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Li T Y, Liu H Y, Ding D L. Predictive energy management of fuel cell supercapacitor hybrid construction equipment. Energy, 2018, 149: 718–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Lu X H, Li Z, Guo L L, et al. Optimization of gearshift MAP based on DP for vehicles with automated transmission. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 119202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Caux S, Gaoua Y, Lopez P. A combinatorial optimisation approach to energy management strategy for a hybrid fuel cell vehicle. Energy, 2017, 133: 219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Fletcher T, Thring R, Watkinson M. An energy management strategy to concurrently optimise fuel consumption & PEM fuel cell lifetime in a hybrid vehicle. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 21503–21515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Muñoz P M, Correa G, Gaudiano M E, et al. Energy management control design for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles using neural networks. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 28932–28944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Feroldi D, Serra M, Riera J. Energy management strategies based on efficiency map for fuel cell hybrid vehicles. J Power Source, 2009, 190: 387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Hames Y, Kaya K, Baltacioglu E, et al. Analysis of the control strategies for fuel saving in the hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 10810–10821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Ahmadi S, Bathaee S M T, Hosseinpour A H. Improving fuel economy and performance of a fuel-cell hybrid electric vehicle (fuel-cell, battery, and ultra-capacitor) using optimized energy management strategy. Energy Convers Manage, 2018, 160: 74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Fernández R A, Caraballo S C, Cilleruelo F B, et al. Fuel optimization strategy for hydrogen fuel cell range extender vehicles applying genetic algorithms. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2018, 81: 655–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and ControlJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Department of Control Science and EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations