Advertisement

Further results on dynamic-algebraic Boolean control networks

  • Sen Wang
  • Jun-E. FengEmail author
  • Yongyuan Yu
  • Jianli Zhao
Research Paper
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Restricted coordinate transformation, controllability, observability and topological structures of dynamic-algebraic Boolean control networks are investigated under an assumption. Specifically, given the input-state at some point, assume that the subsequent state is certain or does not exist. First, the system can be expressed in a new form after numbering the elements in admissible set. Then, restricted coordinate transformation is raised, which allows the dimension of new coordinate frame to be different from that of the original one. The system after restricted coordinate transformation is derived in the proposed form. Afterwards, three types of incidence matrices are constructed and the results of controllability, observability and topological structures are obtained. Finally, two practical examples are shown to demonstrate the theory in this paper.

Keywords

controllability dynamic-algebraic Boolean control network fixed point and cycle observability restricted coordinate transformation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61773371).

References

  1. 1.
    Kauffman S A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J Theory Biol, 1969, 22: 437–467MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akutsu T, Miyano S, Kuhara S. Inferring qualitative relations in genetic networks and metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16: 727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albert R, Barabási A L. Dynamics of complex systems: scaling laws for the period of Boolean networks. Phys Rev Lett, 2000, 84: 5660–5663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang S Q, Ching W K, Chen X, et al. Generating probabilistic Boolean networks from a prescribed stationary distribution. Inf Sci, 2010, 180: 2560–2570MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao Q C. A remark on “scalar equations for synchronous Boolean networks with biological applications” by C. Farrow, J. Heidel, J. Maloney, and J. Rogers. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 2005, 16: 1715–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng D Z. Semi-tensor product of matrices and its application to Morgen’s problem. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2001, 44: 195–212MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng D Z, Qi H S. A linear representation of dynamics of Boolean networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2010, 55: 2251–2258MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao J T, Chen Z Q, Liu Z X. Modeling and analysis of colored petri net based on the semi-tensor product of matrices. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 010205MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu G J, Jiang C J. Observable liveness of Petri nets with controllable and observable transitions. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 118102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng D Z, Qi H S. Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks. Automatica, 2009, 45: 1659–1667MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng D Z, Li Z Q, Qi H S. Realization of Boolean control networks. Automatica, 2010, 46: 62–69MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng D Z, Zhao Y. Identification of Boolean control networks. Automatica, 2011, 47: 702–710MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng D Z, Qi H S, Li Z Q, et al. Stability and stabilization of Boolean networks. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2011, 21: 134–156MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheng D Z. Disturbance decoupling of Boolean control networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2011, 56: 2–10MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Y, Li B W, Lu J Q, et al. Pinning control for the disturbance decoupling problem of Boolean networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2017, 62: 6595–6601MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meng M, Lam J, Feng J E, et al. l1-gain analysis and model reduction problem for Boolean control networks. Inf Sci, 2016, 348: 68–83CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng D Z, Qi H S, Liu T, et al. A note on observability of Boolean control networks. Syst Control Lett, 2016, 87: 76–82MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang K Z, Zhang L J. Observability of Boolean control networks: a unified approach based on the theories of finite automata. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2014, 61: 6854–6861Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu Q X, Liu Y, Lu J Q, et al. Observability of Boolean control networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 092201MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cheng D Z. Input-state approach to Boolean networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 2009, 20: 512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao Y, Qi H S, Cheng D Z. Input-state incidence matrix of Boolean control networks and its applications. Syst Control Lett, 2010, 59: 767–774MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu G B, Xu S Y, Wei Y L, et al. New insight into reachable set estimation for uncertain singular time-delay systems. Appl Math Comput, 2018, 320: 769–780MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu L S, Li H D, Wu Y H, et al. Existence and uniqueness of positive solutions for singular fractional differential systems with coupled integral boundary conditions. J Nonlinear Sci Appl, 2017, 10: 243–262MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu L S, Sun F L, Zhang X G, et al. Bifurcation analysis for a singular differential system with two parameters via to topological degree theory. Nonlinear Anal Model Control, 2017, 22: 31–50MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zheng Z W, Kong Q K. Friedrichs extensions for singular Hamiltonian operators with intermediate deficiency indices. J Math Anal Appl, 2018, 461: 1672–1685MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheng D Z, Zhao Y, Xu X R. Mix-valued logic and its applications. J Shandong Univ (Natl Sci), 2011, 46: 32–44MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feng J E, Yao J, Cui P. Singular Boolean networks: semi-tensor product approach. Sci China Inf Sci, 2013, 56: 112203MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meng M, Feng J E. Optimal control problem of singular Boolean control networks. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2015, 13: 266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu Y, Li B W, Chen H W, et al. Function perturbations on singular Boolean networks. Automatica, 2017, 84: 36–42MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qiao Y P, Qi H S, Cheng D Z. Partition-based solutions of static logical networks with applications. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2018, 29: 1252–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guo Y X. Nontrivial periodic solutions of nonlinear functional differential systems with feedback control. Turkish J Math, 2010, 34: 35MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma C Q, Li T, Zhang J F. Consensus control for leader-following multi-agent systems with measurement noises. J Syst Sci Complex, 2010, 23: 35–49MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qin H Y, Liu J W, Zuo X, et al. Approximate controllability and optimal controls of fractional evolution systems in abstract spaces. Adv Diff Equ, 2014, 2014: 322MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sun W W, Peng L H. Observer-based robust adaptive control for uncertain stochastic Hamiltonian systems with state and input delays. Nonlinear Anal Model Control, 2014, 19: 626–645MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khatri C G, Rao C R. Solutions to some functional equations and their applications to characterization of probability distributions. Indian J Stat Ser A, 1968, 30: 167–180MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heidel J, Maloney J, Farrow C, et al. Finding cycles in synchronous Boolean networks with applications to biochemical systems. Int J Bifurcation Chaos, 2003, 13: 535–552MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ashenhurst R L. The decomposition of switching functions. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Theory of Switching, 1957. 74–116Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Curtis H A. A New Approach to the Design of Switching Circuits. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1962Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sasao T, Butler J T. On Bi-Decompositions of Logic Functions. Technical Report, DTIC Document, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sasao T. Application of multiple-valued logic to a serial decomposition of plas. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, 1989. 264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Muroga S. Logic Design and Switching Theory. New York: Wiley, 1979zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sen Wang
    • 1
  • Jun-E. Feng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yongyuan Yu
    • 1
  • Jianli Zhao
    • 2
  1. 1.School of MathematicsShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.School of Mathematical ScienceLiaocheng UniversityLiaochengChina

Personalised recommendations