Advertisement

Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 11, pp 1873–1884 | Cite as

Microscopic view of phytoplankton along the Yangtze River

  • YuXin Liu
  • XuMing Xu
  • Ting Wang
  • JinRen NiEmail author
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Phytoplankton play an important role in nutrient cycling and energy conversion. However, phytoplankton community is poorly understood in large river ecosystems. Based on the large-scale samplings conducted in spring and autumn of 2017, a systematic study has been made on seasonal and spatial distributions of phytoplankton community along the mainstream of the Yangtze River. As results, 6 phyla were identified and 59 phytoplankton species were detected using microscopy, including Bacillariophyta (29 species), Chlorophyta (13 species) and Cyanophyta (8 species) as the dominant group. Moreover, the density of phytoplankton was ranged 0.05 × 106−1.90 × 106 cells/L and the biomass was 0.01–1.01 mg/L, both reaching their maximum in the middle reach from Yichang to Wuhan. Significant seasonal difference of phytoplankton community was observed and spatial dissimilarity in spring was revealed. The cell abundance and biomass of phytoplankton could be fairly estimated by chlorophyll-a, and redundancy analysis indicated that water temperature, dissolved oxygen, biochemical oxygen demand, nitrite, and ammonia nitrogen were the most important explanatory environmental factors for phytoplankton compositions in the Yangtze River.

Keywords

microscopic view phytoplankton community spatiotemporal distribution Yangtze River environmental factor 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Litchman E. Resource competition and the ecological success of phytoplankton. In: Falkowski P G, Knoll A H, eds. Evolution of Primary Producers in the Sea. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2007. 351–375Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hou Z, Jiang Y, Liu Q, et al. Impacts of environmental variables on a phytoplankton community: A case study of the tributaries of a subtropical river, Southern China. Water, 2018, 10: 152Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cellamare M, Morin S, Coste M, et al. Ecological assessment of French Atlantic lakes based on phytoplankton, phytobenthos and macrophytes. Environ Monit Assess, 2012, 184: 4685–4708Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aufdenkampe A K, Mayorga E, Raymond P A, et al. Riverine coupling of biogeochemical cycles between land, oceans, and atmosphere. Front Ecol Environ, 2011, 9: 53–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barton A D, Dutkiewicz S, Flierl G, et al. Patterns of diversity in marine phytoplankton. Science, 2010, 327: 1509–1511Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tréguer P, Bowler C, Moriceau B, et al. Influence of diatom diversity on the ocean biological carbon pump. Nat Geosci, 2018, 11: 27–37Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rath A R, Mitbavkar S, Anil A C. Phytoplankton community structure in relation to environmental factors from the New Mangalore Port waters along the southwest coast of India. Environ Monit Assess, 2018, 190: 481Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang Y, Hu R, Lin Q, et al. Spatial structure and β-diversity of phytoplankton in Tibetan Plateau lakes: Nestedness or replacement? Hydrobiologia, 2018, 808: 301–314Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitner M, Poulícková A. Littoral diatoms as indicators for the eutrophication of shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 506–509: 519–524Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang M, Straile D, Chen F, et al. Dynamics and drivers of phytoplankton richness and composition along productivity gradient. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 625: 275–284Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soballe D M, Kimmel B L. A large-scale comparison of factors influencing phytoplankton abundance in rivers, lakes, and impoundments. Ecology, 1987, 68: 1943–1954Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arhonditsis G B, Stow C A, Paerl H W, et al. Delineation of the role of nutrient dynamics and hydrologic forcing on phytoplankton patterns along a freshwater-marine continuum. Ecol Model, 2007, 208: 230–246Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao W, Li Y, Jiao Y, et al. Spatial and temporal variations in environmental variables in relation to phytoplankton community structure in a eutrophic river-type reservoir. Water, 2017, 9: 754Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu M D, Li P F, Zeng Z G, et al. The characteristic of phytoplankton community structure in Anqing section of the Yangtze River (in Chinese). Freshwater Fish, 2017, 47: 29–36Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Z, Zhao J, Zhang Y, et al. Phytoplankton community structure and environmental parameters in aquaculture areas of Daya Bay, South China Sea. J Environ Sci, 2009, 21: 1268–1275Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qu Y, Wu N, Guse B, et al. Riverine phytoplankton functional groups response to multiple stressors variously depending on hydrological periods. Ecol Indic, 2019, 101: 41–49Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu B, Zhao D Y, Jia H Y, et al. Preliminary risk assessment of trace metal pollution in surface water from Yangtze River in Nanjing section, China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 2009, 82: 405–409Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Müller B, Berg M, Yao Z P, et al. How polluted is the Yangtze River? Water quality downstream from the Three Gorges Dam. Sci Total Environ, 2008, 402: 232–247Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu H, Li W. Dissolved trace elements and heavy metals from the shallow lakes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River region, China. Environ Earth Sci, 2011, 62: 1503–1511Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yi Y, Yang Z, Zhang S. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediment and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fishes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin. Environ Pollut, 2011, 159: 2575–2585Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li S, Meng W, Xie Y. Forecasting the amount of waste-sewage water discharged into the Yangtze River basin based on the optimal fractional order grey model. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15: 20Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Z S, Huang X F. Methods of Freshwater Plankton Research (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1991Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hu H J, Wei Y X. The Freshwater Algae of China: Systematics, Taxonomy and Ecology (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2006Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weng J Z, Xu H X. Atlas of Common Freshwater Algae in China (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chinese State Environmental Protection Administration. Water and Wastewater Monitoring Analysis Methods (Version 4) (in Chinese). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fan B, Jia C. Visual framework for big data in d3.js. In: 2014 IEEE Workshop on Electronics, Computer and Applications. Ottawa: IEEE, 2014Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol, 2011, 12: R60Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu G, Xu Z. Prediction of algal blooming using EFDC model: Case study in the Daoxiang Lake. Ecol Model, 2011, 222: 1245–1252Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xue X M, Xu R, Zhang B R, et al. Current pollution status of Yangtze River and controlling measures. Int J Environ Waste Manage, 2008, 2: 267Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gao L, Li D, Zhang Y. Nutrients and particulate organic matter discharged by the Changjiang (Yangtze River): Seasonal variations and temporal trends. J Geophys Res, 2012, 117: G04001Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wei Y. Study of phytoplankton community in the channel from Dongting Lake to Changjiang River, China. Chin J Ocean Limnol, 2006, 24: 178–185Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhu A, Hu J, Li S, et al. Phytoplankton diversity and water quality in the main stream and tributaries of Three Gorges Reservoir region of Yangtze River during dry seasons (in Chinese). J Lake Sci, 2013, 25: 378–385Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li S J, Fan Z H, Ren Y Q, et al. Annual characteristics of phytoplankton communities at Yichang to Chenglingji section in the middle reach of the Yangtze River (in Chinese). Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21: 62–68Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu X, Li Y L, Liu B G, et al. Cyanobacteria in the complex riverconnected Poyang Lake: Horizontal distribution and transport. Hydrobiologia, 2016, 768: 95–110Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shen H L, Xu Y Y, Wang L, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of phytoplankton in Danjiangkou Reservoir and its affecting factors (in Chinese). Plant Sci J, 2011, 29: 683–690Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salmaso N, Naselli-Flores L, Padisak J. Impairing the largest and most productive forest on our planet: How do human activities impact phytoplankton? In: Salmaso N, Naselli-Flores L, Cerasino L, et al, eds. Phytoplankton responses to human impacts at different scales. Developments in Hydrobiology, Vol 221. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. 375–384Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu X H, Yin D C, Li C, et al. Analysis of factors influencing diatom blooms in the middle and lower Hanjiang River (in Chinese). J Hydroecol, 2017, 38: 19–26Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhao Z, Mi T, Xia L, et al. Understanding the patterns and mechanisms of urban water ecosystem degradation: Phytoplankton community structure and water quality in the Qinhuai River, Nanjing city, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2013, 20: 5003–5012Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dembowska E. Phytoplankton of shallow lakes in the Iławskie Lake District. Limnological Papers, 2008, 3: 19–31Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ayalew W, Akoma O. Seasonal variation of phytoplankton biomass in Lake Tana (Ethiopia). Tropical Freshwater Biol, 2009, 17: 21–31Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kagami M, Helmsing N R, van Donk E. Parasitic chytrids could promote copepod survival by mediating material transfer from inedible diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 2011, 659: 49–54Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lürling M, Eshetu F, Faassen E J, et al. Comparison of cyanobacterial and green algal growth rates at different temperatures. Freshwater Biol, 2013, 58: 552–559Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang B, Jiang Y J, He W, et al. The tempo-spatial variations of phytoplankton diversities and their correlation with trophic state levels in a large eutrophic Chinese lake. Ecol Indic, 2016, 66: 153–162Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cole J J, Caraco N F, Peierls B L. Can phytoplankton maintaina positive carbon balance in a turbid, freshwater, tidal estuary? Limnol Oceanogr, 1992, 37: 1608–1617Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pesce S, Fajon C, Bardot C, et al. Longitudinal changes in microbial planktonic communities of a French river in relation to pesticide and nutrient inputs. Aquat Toxicol, 2008, 86: 352–360Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lange T R, Rada R G. Community dynamics of phytoplankton in a typical navigation pool in the Upper Mississippi River. Jour Iowa Acad Sci, 1993, 100: 21–27Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Huff D R. Phytoplankton communities in Navigation Pool No. 7 of the Upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia, 1986, 136: 47–56Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sabater S, Artigas J, Durán C, et al. Longitudinal development of chlorophyll and phytoplankton assemblages in a regulated large river (the Ebro River). Sci Total Environ, 2008, 404: 196–206Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    New T, Xie Z. Impacts of large dams on riparian vegetation: Applying global experience to the case of China’s Three Gorges Dam. Biodivers Conserv, 2008, 17: 3149–3163Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stirbet A, Lazár D, Papageorgiou G C, et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence in cyanobacteria: relation to photosynthesis. In: Mishra A K, Tiwari D N, Rai A N, eds. Cyanobacteria: From Basic Sciences to Applications. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2019. 79–130Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morin A, Lamoureux W, Busnarda J. Empirical models predicting primary productivity from chlorophyll a and water temperature for stream periphyton and lake and ocean phytoplankton. J North Am Benthological Soc, 1999, 18: 299–307Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    El-Serehy H A, Abdallah H S, Al-Misned F A, et al. Assessing water quality and classifying trophic status for scientifically based managing the water resources of the Lake Timsah, the lake with salinity stratification along the Suez Canal. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2018, 25: 1247–1256Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Andersson A, Haecky P, Hagström Å. Effect of temperature and light on the growth of micro- nano- and pico-plankton: Impact on algal succession. Mar Biol, 1994, 120: 511–520Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Deng J, Qin B, Paerl H W, et al. Effects of nutrients, temperature and their interactions on spring phytoplankton community succession in Lake Taihu, China. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9: e113960Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pulina S, Satta C T, Padedda B M, et al. Seasonal variations of phytoplankton size structure in relation to environmental variables in three Mediterranean shallow coastal lagoons. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 2018, 212: 95–104Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Borsuah J F, Stoodley S, Storm D, et al. Development of a three-layer steady state vertical dissolved oxygen model in Grand Lake, Oklahoma. Nat Resour, 2018, 9: 448–467Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gupta A K, Gupta S K, Patil R S. Statistical analyses of coastal water quality for a port and harbour region in India. Environ Monit Assess, 2005, 102: 179–200Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jiang Y J, He W, Liu W X, et al. The seasonal and spatial variations of phytoplankton community and their correlation with environmental factors in a large eutrophic Chinese lake (Lake Chaohu). Ecol Indicators, 2014, 40: 58–67Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lopes M R M, Bicudo C E M, Ferragut M C. Short term spatial and temporal variation of phytoplankton in a shallow tropical oligotrophic reservoir, southeast Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 2005, 542: 235–247Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Weyhenmeyer G A, Broberg N. Increasing algal biomass in Lake Vänern despite decreasing phosphorus concentrations: A lake-specific phenomenon? Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage, 2014, 17: 341–348Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Salhi N, Zmerli Triki H, Molinero J C, et al. Seasonal variability of picophytoplankton under contrasting environments in northern Tunisian coasts, southwestern Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull, 2018, 129: 866–874Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Boyer J N, Dailey S K, Gibson P J, et al. The role of dissolved organic matter bioavailability in promoting phytoplankton blooms in Florida Bay. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 569: 71–85Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Xu H, Paerl H W, Qin B, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus inputs control phytoplankton growth in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Limnol Oceanogr, 2010, 55: 420–432Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pilkaitytė R, Razinkovas A. Seasonal changes in phytoplankton composition and nutrient limitation in a shallow Baltic lagoon. Boreal Environ Res, 2007, 12: 551–559Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Anderson D M, Glibert P M, Burkholder J M. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries, 2002, 25: 704–726Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dortch Q. The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1990, 61: 183–201Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rodríguez J, Tintoré J, Allen J T, et al. Mesoscale vertical motion and the size structure of phytoplankton in the ocean. Nature, 2001, 410: 360–363Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Fraisse S, Bormans M, Lagadeuc Y. Morphofunctional traits reflect differences in phytoplankton community between rivers of contrasting flow regime. Aquat Ecol, 2013, 47: 315–327Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations