Oxide transformation and break-up of liquid metal in boiling solutions

  • LiXiang Yang
  • Xi Zhao
  • Shuo Xu
  • YongYu Lu
  • Hao Chang
  • Jing LiuEmail author


The non-toxic gallium-based liquid metals (LMs) are promising for various newly emerging areas due to having excellent fluidity, high electrical and heat conductivity. However, the oxide layers often affect their applications. In this paper, we disclosed a straightforward boiling strategy to efficiently remove the oxide of LM in deionized water. Meanwhile such method was also demonstrated to be capable of quickly breaking up LM into droplets (mean 0.51 mm, SD 0.20 mm) in NaCl solution, which has important value for manufacture purpose. According to the force analysis, surface tension of LM dominates the interaction between solution bubbles and LM under the same heating conditions. Then we characterized the surface morphology and compositions of LM droplets boiled (LMDB) using scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and tested the dynamic force between a rod and LMDB. It was shown that after being boiled in water, most of Ga2O3 was transformed to scattered α-GaOOH nanorods which has less restriction to the deformation of LM and large resistance force (0.8 mN) was tested; otherwise, after boiled in NaCl solution, more Ga2O3 with contact patch structure reduces the surface resistance of LM (0.2 mN) and makes it to be broken up by bubbles. The different surface products are determined by the inhibition of hydrolysis of Ga3+ by NaCl solution. This study paved a simple way for oxide removal in neutral solution and mass production of LMD. It also suggests an efficient approach for exploring mechanisms of interactions between LM and bubbles, which is difficult to study otherwise in sonication.


liquid metal boiling solutions oxide transformation break-up hydrolysis inhibition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 2.08 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 1.22 MB.

11431_2018_9444_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (48 kb)
Oxide transformation and break-up of liquid metal in boiling solutions


  1. 1.
    Daeneke T, Khoshmanesh K, Mahmood N, et al, Liquid metals: Fundamentals and applications in chemistry, Chem Soc Rev, 2018, 47: 4073–4111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ma K Q, Liu J, Heat-driven liquid metal cooling device for the thermal management of a computer chip, J Phys D-Appl Phys, 2007, 40: 4722–4729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deng Y, Liu J, Hybrid liquid metal-water cooling system for heat dissipation of high power density microdevices, Heat Mass Transfer, 2010, 46: 1327–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tan S C, Zhou Y X, Wang L, et al, Electrically driven chip cooling device using hybrid coolants of liquid metal and aqueous solution, Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeong S H, Hagman A, Hjort K, et al, Liquid alloy printing of microfluidic stretchable electronics, Lab Chip, 2012, 12: 4657–4664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tabatabai A, Fassler A, Usiak C, et al, Liquid-phase gallium-indium alloy electronics with microcontact printing, Langmuir, 2013, 29: 6194–6200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Q, Zheng Y, Liu J, Direct writing of electronics based on alloy and metal (DREAM) ink: A newly emerging area and its impact on energy, environment and health sciences, Front Energy, 2012, 6: 311–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang L, Liu J, Liquid phase 3D printing for quickly manufacturing conductive metal objects with low melting point alloy ink, Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 1721–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ladd C, So J H, Muth J, et al. 3D printing of free standing liquid metal microstructures. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 5081–5085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mei S, Gao Y, Li H, et al, Thermally induced porous structures in printed gallium coating to make transparent conductive film, Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 102: 041905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tang X, Tang S Y, Sivan V, et al, Photochemically induced motion of liquid metal marbles, Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103: 174104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang J, Sheng L, Liu J, Synthetically chemical-electrical mechanism for controlling large scale reversible deformation of liquid metal objects, Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 7116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fang W Q, He Z Z, Liu J, Electro-hydrodynamic shooting phenomenon of liquid metal stream, Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105: 134104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang S Y, Joshipura I D, Lin Y, et al, Liquid-metal microdroplets formed dynamically with electrical control of size and rate, Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 604–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim D, Lee J B. Magnetic-field-induced liquid metal droplet manipulation. J Korean Phys Soc, 2015, 66: 282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zavabeti A, Daeneke T, Chrimes A F, et al, Ionic imbalance induced self-propulsion of liquid metals, Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Downs A J. Chemistry of Aluminium, Gallium, Indium and Thallium. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu T, Sen P, Kim C J, Characterization of nontoxic liquid-metal alloy galinstan for applications in microdevices, J Microelectromech Syst, 2012, 21: 443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng S, Wu Z, Hallbjorner P, et al, Foldable and stretchable liquid metal planar inverted cone antenna, IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat, 2009, 57: 3765–3771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gao M, Gui L, A handy liquid metal based electroosmotic flow pump, Lab Chip, 2014, 14: 1866–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang S Y, Khoshmanesh K, Sivan V, et al, Liquid metal enabled pump, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 3304–3309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kramer R K, Majidi C, Sahai R, et al, Soft curvature sensors for joint angle proprioception, In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Francisco, 2011. 1919–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Majidi C, Kramer R, Wood R J, A non-differential elastomer curvature sensor for softer-than-skin electronics, Smart Mater Struct, 2011, 20: 105017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hutter T, Bauer W A C, Elliott S R, et al, Formation of spherical and non-spherical eutectic gallium-indium liquid-metal microdroplets in microfluidic channels at room temperature, Adv Funct Mater, 2012, 22: 2624–2631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu Y, Wang Q, Yi L, et al, Channelless fabrication for large-scale preparation of room temperature liquid metal droplets, Adv Eng Mater, 2014, 16: 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Friedman H, Reich S, Popovitz-Biro R, et al. Micro-and nano-spheres of low melting point metals and alloys, formed by ultrasonic cavitation. Ultrasons Sonochem, 2013, 20: 432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scharmann F, Cherkashinin G, Breternitz V, et al, Viscosity effect on GaInSn studied by XPS, Surf Interface Anal, 2004, 36: 981–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng Y, He Z Z, Yang J, et al, Personal electronics printing via tapping mode composite liquid metal ink delivery and adhesion mechanism, Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 4588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giguère P A, Lamontagne D, Polarography with a dropping gallium electrode, Science, 1954, 120: 390–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim D, Lee Y, Lee D, et al, Hydrochloric acid-impregnated paper for liquid metal microfluidics, In: 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Barcelona, 2013. 2620–2623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim D, Thissen P, Viner G, et al, Recovery of nonwetting characteristics by surface modification of gallium-based liquid metal droplets using hydrochloric acid vapor, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2012, 5: 179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang J, Yao Y, Sheng L, et al, Self-fueled biomimetic liquid metal mollusk, Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 2648–2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sheng L, Zhang J, Liu J, Diverse transformations of liquid metals between different morphologies, Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 6036–6042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shanmugan S, Mutharasu D, Structural and optical properties of ultrahigh pure hot water processed Ga2O3 thin film, Mater Sci, 2016, 22: 166–169Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zavabeti A, Ou J Z, Carey B J, et al, A liquid metal reaction environment for the room-temperature synthesis of atomically thin metal oxides, Science, 2017, 358: 332–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zeng L Z, Klausner J F, Mei R, A unified model for the prediction of bubble detachment diameters in boiling systems—I, Pool boiling. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1993, 36: 2261–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gupta M K, Sharma D S, Lakhera V J, Detachment forces on spherical bubble during formation, Mater Today-Proc, 2017, 4: 4130–4136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baes C F, Mesmer R S. The Hydrolysis of Cations. New York: Wiley, 1976Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sato T, Nakamura T, Studies of the crystallisation of gallium hydroxide precipitated from hydrochloric acid solutions by various alkalis, J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 1982, 32: 469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Diakonov I I, Pokrovski G S, Bénézeth P, et al, Gallium speciation in aqueous solution, Experimental study and modelling: Part 1. Thermodynamic properties of Ga(OH)4–to 300°C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1997, 61: 1333–1343Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Uchida M, Okuwaki A, Solubility of gallium(III) oxyhydroxide in aqueous NaCl solutions at 100°C, J Solution Chem, 1997, 26: 699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Horasawa N, Nakajima H, Takahashi S, et al, Behavior of pure gallium in water and various saline solutions, Dental Mater J, 1997, 16: 200–208, 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Surdu-Bob C C, Saied S O, Sullivan J L, An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the oxides of GaAs, Appl Surf Sci, 2001, 183: 126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ha J S, Park S-J, Kim S-B, et al, Correlation of surface morphology with chemical structures of sulfur-passivated GaAs(100) investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, J Vac Sci Tech A, 1995, 13: 646–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yu S, Qing-Qing S, Lin D, et al, Improvement of atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3/GaAs interface property by sulfuration and NH3 thermal nitridation, Chin Phys Lett, 2008, 25: 3954–3956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dar M I, Sampath S, Shivashankar S A, Exploiting oriented attachment in stabilizing La3+-doped gallium oxide nano-spindles, RSC Adv, 2014, 4: 49360–49366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hinkle C L, Milojevic M, Brennan B, et al, Detection of Ga suboxides and their impact on III-V passivation and Fermi-level pinning, Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 94: 162101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Larsen R J, Dickey M D, Whitesides G M, et al, Viscoelastic properties of oxide-coated liquid metals, J Rheol, 2009, 53: 1305–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • LiXiang Yang
    • 1
  • Xi Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuo Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • YongYu Lu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hao Chang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jing Liu
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Cryo-Biomedical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of MedicineTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations