Advertisement

Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 70–79 | Cite as

Three-dimensional porous composite framework assembled with CuO microspheres as anode current collector for lithium-ion batteries

  • ShiMin Huang
  • Jian Luo
  • Wei YuanEmail author
  • BoTe Zhao
  • Yu Chen
  • Yong Tang
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The surface structure and material composition of current collectors have significant effects on the electrochemical performances of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). In this work, a three-dimensional (3D) porous composite framework is applied as the anode current collector in LIBs. This unique 3D skeleton is composed of conductive carbon fiber/Cu core/shell fibrous structure. With an oxidation treatment upon the copper shell, the porous framework is assembled with CuO microspheres. Using mesocarbon microbead (MCMB) graphite powders as the active material, the cell with this 3D porous composite current collector shows an improved reversible discharge-charge capacity of 415 mAh g–1 at a current rate of 0.1 C after 50 cycles, which is much higher than that of the cell with a flat Cu foil (127 mAh g–1). It is demonstrated that this unique fibrous network of the 3D current collector coupled with the morphological effects of the CuO microspheres greatly improve the cell performance in terms of electrical conductivity, reversible capacity and cycling stability.

Keywords

lithium-ion battery current collector porous framework CuO microspheres carbon fiber 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Armand M, Tarascon J M. Building better batteries. Nature, 2008, 451: 652–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scrosati B, Garche J. Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. J Power Sources, 2010, 195: 2419–2430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scrosati B. Power sources for portable electronics and hybrid cars: Lithium batteries and fuel cells. Chem Record, 2005, 5: 286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodenough J B, Kim Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater, 2010, 22: 587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patil A, Patil V, Wook Shin D, et al. Issue and challenges facing rechargeable thin film lithium batteries. Mater Res Bull, 2008, 43: 1913–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palacín M R. Recent advances in rechargeable battery materials: A chemist’s perspective. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38: 2565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endo M, Kim C, Nishimura K, et al. Recent development of carbon materials for Li ion batteries. Carbon, 2000, 38: 183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang R, Liu J, Guo H, et al. Synthesis of CuO nanowire arrays as high-performance electrode for lithium ion batteries. Mater Lett, 2015, 139: 55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rai A K, Anh L T, Gim J, et al. Facile approach to synthesize CuO/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as anode materials for lithiumion battery. J Power Sources, 2013, 244: 435–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang L, Gong H, Wang C, et al. Facile synthesis of novel tunable highly porous CuO nanorods for high rate lithium battery anodes with realized long cycle life and high reversible capacity. Nanoscale, 2012, 4: 6850–6855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Y Q, Li X W, Wei Z W, et al. Preparation and electrochemical performance of MWCNTs@MnO2 nanocomposite for lithium ion batteries. Sci China Technol Sci, 2014, 57: 1077–1080Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Penki T R, Shivakumara S, Minakshi M, et al. Porous Flower-like α- Fe2O3 Nanostructure: A High Performance Anode Material for Lithium- ion Batteries. Electrochim Acta, 2015, 167: 330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu Z S, Ren W, Wen L, et al. Graphene anchored with Co3O4 nanoparticles as anode of lithium ion batteries with enhanced reversible capacity and cyclic performance. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 3187–3194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang C, Higgins D, Wang F, et al. Controlled synthesis of micro/nanostructured CuO anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy, 2014, 9: 334–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiang J Y, Tu J P, Zhang L, et al. Self-assembled synthesis of hierarchical nanostructured CuO with various morphologies and their application as anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources, 2010, 195: 313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dang R, Jia X, Liu X, et al. Controlled synthesis of hierarchical Cu nanosheets@CuO nanorods as high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy, 2017, 33: 427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao J, Shan W F, Xia X B, et al. SnO2-CuO/graphene nanocomposites for high performance Li-ion battery anodes. Sci China Technol Sci, 2014, 57: 1081–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pan Q, Jin H, Wang H, et al. Flower-like CuO film-electrode for lithium ion batteries and the effect of surface morphology on electrochemical performance. Electrochim Acta, 2008, 53: 951–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang H, Liu Y, Wang J, et al. Self-assembly of mesoporous CuO nanosheets-CNT 3D-network composites for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2013, 5: 1785–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ko S, Lee J I, Yang H S, et al. Mesoporous CuO particles threaded with CNTs for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 4451–4456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang B, Wu X L, Shu C Y, et al. Synthesis of CuO/graphene nanocomposite as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem, 2010, 20: 10661–10664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y, Wang W, Gu L, et al. Flexible CuO nanosheets/reduced-graphene oxide composite paper: Binder-free anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 9850–9855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park S H, Lee W J. Hierarchically mesoporous CuO/carbon nanofiber coaxial shell-core nanowires for lithium ion batteries. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 9754–9766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang W, Wang J, Ma W, et al. Free-standing CuO nanoflake arrays coated Cu foam for advanced lithium ion battery anodes. J Power Sources, 2016, 333: 88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jing S, Jiang H, Hu Y, et al. Directly grown Si nanowire arrays on Cu foam with a coral-like surface for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 14441–14445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang J, Huang X, Zhou G, et al. Three-dimensional carbon-coated Si/rGO nanostructures anchored by nickel foam with carbon nanotubes for Li-ion battery applications. Nano Energy, 2015, 15: 679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cui L F, Hu L, Choi J W, et al. Light-weight free-standing carbon nanotube-silicon films for anodes of lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 3671–3678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xiong Q Q, Tu J P, Xia X H, et al. A three-dimensional hierarchical Fe2O3@NiO core/shell nanorod array on carbon cloth: A new class of anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2013, 5: 7906–7912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Long H, Shi T, Hu H, et al. Growth of hierarchal mesoporous NiO nanosheets on carbon cloth as binder-free anodes for high-performance flexible lithium-ion batteries. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 7413–7421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang J, Du N, Song Z, et al. Synthesis of SiGe-based three-dimensional nanoporous electrodes for high performance lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources, 2013, 229: 185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Park H, Um J H, Choi H, et al. Hierarchical micro-lamella-structured 3D porous copper current collector coated with tin for advanced lithium- ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci, 2016, 399: 132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wong K H, Pickering S J, Rudd C D. Recycled carbon fibre reinforced polymer composite for electromagnetic interference shielding. Composites Part A-Appl Sci Manufacturing, 2010, 41: 693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rams J, Ureña A, Escalera M D, et al. Electroless nickel coated short carbon fibres in aluminium matrix composites. Composites Part AAppl Sci Manufacturing, 2007, 38: 566–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang H, Pan Q, Zhao J, et al. Fabrication of CuO film with networklike architectures through solution-immersion and their application in lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources, 2007, 167: 206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Luo J, Yuan W, Huang S, et al. From checkerboard-like sand barriers to 3D Cu@CNF composite current collectors for high-performance batteries. Adv Sci, 2018, 5: 1800031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gan Z H, Yu G Q, Tay B K, et al. Preparation and characterization of copper oxide thin films deposited by filtered cathodic vacuum arc. J Phys D-Appl Phys, 2004, 37: 81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin L, Martinez H, Poinot D, et al. Direct observation of important morphology and composition changes at the surface of the CuO conversion material in lithium batteries. J Power Sources, 2014, 248: 861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    An S J, Li J, Daniel C, et al. The state of understanding of the lithiumion- battery graphite solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and its relationship to formation cycling. Carbon, 2016, 105: 52–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhuang Q C, Qiu X Y, Xu S D, et al. Diagnosis of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in lithium ion batteries. Prog Chem, 2010, 22: 1044–1057Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cheng S, Shi T, Tao X, et al. In-situ oxidized copper-based hybrid film on carbon cloth as flexible anode for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 212: 492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zheng H, Jiang K, Abe T, et al. Electrochemical intercalation of lithium into a natural graphite anode in quaternary ammonium-based ionic liquid electrolytes. Carbon, 2006, 44: 203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Song L, Yang S, Wei W, et al. Hierarchical SnO2 nanoflowers assembled by atomic thickness nanosheets as anode material for lithium ion battery. Sci Bull, 2015, 60: 892–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • ShiMin Huang
    • 1
  • Jian Luo
    • 1
  • Wei Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • BoTe Zhao
    • 2
  • Yu Chen
    • 2
  • Yong Tang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Automotive EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations